Skip to main content

Acquisition and Reuse of Reasoning Knowledge from Textual Cases for Automated Analysis

  • Conference paper
Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8765))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Analysis is essential for solving complex problems such as diagnosing a patient, investigating an accident or predicting the outcome of a legal case. It is a non-trivial process even for human experts. To assist experts in this process we propose a CBR-based approach for automated problem analysis. In this approach a new problem is analysed by reusing reasoning knowledge from the analysis of a similar problem. To avoid the laborious process of manual case acquisition, the reasoning knowledge is extracted automatically from text and captured in a graph-based representation, which we dubbed Text Reasoning Graph (TRG), that consists of causal, entailment and paraphrase relations. The reuse procedure involves adaptation of a similar past analysis to a new problem by finding paths in TRG that connect the evidence in the new problem to conclusions of the past analysis. The objective is to generate the best explanation of how the new evidence connects to the conclusion. For evaluation, we built a system for analysing aircraft accidents based on the collection of aviation investigation reports. The evaluation results show that our reuse method increases the precision of the retrieved conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adeyanju, I.: Case reuse in textual case-based reasoning. Ph.D. thesis, Robert Gordon University (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aha, D.W., Breslow, L.A., Muñoz-Avila, H.: Conversational case-based reasoning. Applied Intelligence 14(1), 9–32 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Altenberg, B.: Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica 38(1), 20–69 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Androutsopoulos, I., Malakasiotis, P.: A survey of paraphrasing and textual entailment methods. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 38, 135–187 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashley, K., Lynch, C., Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V.: Toward modeling and teaching legal case-based adaptation with expert examples. In: McGinty, L., Wilson, D.C. (eds.) ICCBR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5650, pp. 45–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bridge, D., Gomes, P., Seco, N.: Analysing air incident reports: workshop challenge. In: Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Textual Case-Based Reasoning (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bridge, D., Healy, P.: Ghostwriter-2.0: Product reviews with case-based support. In: Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVII, pp. 467–480. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brüninghaus, S., Ashley, K.D.: Progress in textual case-based reasoning: predicting the outcome of legal cases from text. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 21, p. 1577. AAAI Press, MIT Press, Menlo Park, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carthy, J., Wilson, D.C., Wang, R., Dunnion, J., Drummond, A.: Using T-ret system to improve incident report retrieval. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2004. LNCS, vol. 2945, pp. 468–471. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Cassidy, D., Carthy, J., Drummond, A., Dunnion, J., Sheppard, J.: The use of data mining in the design and implementation of an incident report retrieval system. In: 2003 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, pp. 13–18. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, C.: Using case-based reasoning to support the indexing and retrieval of incident reports. In: Proceeding of European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2000): Foresight and Precaution, Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. pp. 1387–1394. Citeseer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khoo, C.S.G.: Automatic identification of causal relations in text and their use for improving precision in information retrieval. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Arizona (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lamontagne, L., Lee, H.-H.: Textual reuse for email response. In: Funk, P., González Calero, P.A. (eds.) ECCBR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3155, pp. 242–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Leacock, C., Miller, G.A., Chodorow, M.: Using corpus statistics and wordnet relations for sense identification. Computational Linguistics 24(1), 147–165 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lenz, M., Burkhard, H.D.: Case retrieval nets: Basic ideas and extensions. In: Görz, G., Hölldobler, S. (eds.) KI 1996. LNCS, vol. 1137, pp. 227–239. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Orecchioni, A., Wiratunga, N., Massie, S., Chakraborti, S., Mukras, R.: Learning incident causes. In: Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Textual Case-Based Reasoning (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pearl, J.: Causality: models, reasoning and inference, vol. 29. Cambridge Univ. Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pechsiri, C., Piriyakul, R.: Explanation knowledge graph construction through causality extraction from texts. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 25(5), 1055–1070 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Recio-Garcıa, J.A., Dıaz-Agudo, B., González-Calero, P.A.: Textual cbr in jcolibri: From retrieval to reuse. In: Proceedings of the ICCBR 2007 Workshop on Textual Case-Based Reasoning: Beyond Retrieval, pp. 217–226. Citeseer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Swanson, R., Gordon, A.S.: Say anything: Using textual case-based reasoning to enable open-domain interactive storytelling. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 2(3), 16 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tsatsoulis, C., Amthauer, H.A.: Finding clusters of similar events within clinical incident reports: a novel methodology combining case based reasoning and information retrieval. Quality and Safety in Health Care 12(suppl. 2), ii24–ii32 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wilke, W., Bergmann, R.: Techniques and knowledge used for adaptation during case-based problem solving. In: Mira, J., Moonis, A., de Pobil, A.P. (eds.) IEA/AIE 1998. LNCS, vol. 1416, pp. 497–506. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson, D.C., Bradshaw, S.: Cbr textuality. In: Proceedings of the Fourth UK Case-Based Reasoning Workshop, pp. 67–80. Citeseer (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sizov, G., Öztürk, P., Štyrák, J. (2014). Acquisition and Reuse of Reasoning Knowledge from Textual Cases for Automated Analysis. In: Lamontagne, L., Plaza, E. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8765. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11209-1_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11209-1_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11208-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11209-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics