Skip to main content

Adapting Tutoring Feedback Strategies to Motivation

  • Conference paper
Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities (EC-TEL 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8719))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper investigates tutoring feedback strategies adaptive to student motivation. Several static feedback adaptation strategies have been designed based on the interactive tutoring feedback (ITF) model, implemented within the Adaptive Educational System (AES) ActiveMath and evaluated in a study with 6th and 7th graders. Student motivation profile (high vs. low perceived competence and intrinsic motivation) has been used to assign them to either conceptual or procedural feedback condition. The data analysis shows that, for low motivated students, the benefits of adapting feedback to motivational profiles are visible in both, performance during treatment and knowledge gain from pre- to post-test. For highly motivated students, no significant effects have been registered. These findings shed light on the role of motivation in tutoring feedback processing and have important methodological implications for designing feedback strategies in AESs.

This work has been partly supported by the German National Science Foundation (DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Grants ME 1136/8-1 and NA 738/10-1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hattie, J., Timperley, H.: The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77, 81–112 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hattie, J., Gan, M.: Instruction based on Feedback. In: Mayer, R., Alexander, P. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, pp. 249–271. Routledge, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Narciss, S.: Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In: Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., van Merrienboer, J.J.G., Driscoll, M.P. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 125–144. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shute, V.J.: Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78, 153–189 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramaprasad, A.: On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science (28), 4–13 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sadler, D.R.: Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18, 119–144 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Corbalan, G., Paas, F., Cuypers, H.: Computer-based feedback in linear algebra: Effects on transfer performance and motivation. Computers & Education 55, 692–703 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitrovic, A., Ohlsson, S., Barrow, D.: The effect of positive feedback in a constraint-based intelligent tutoring system. Computers & Education 60, 264–272 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dennis, M., Masthoff, J., Mellish, C.: User modeling, adaptation, and personalization. In: Masthoff, J., Mobasher, B., Desmarais, M.C., Nkambou, R. (eds.) UMAP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7379, pp. 297–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conati, C., Manske, M.: Evaluating adaptive feedback in an educational computer game. In: Ruttkay, Z., Kipp, M., Nijholt, A., Vilhjálmsson, H.H. (eds.) IVA 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5773, pp. 146–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldin, I., Koedinger, K., Aleven, V.: Learner differences in hint processing. In: Yacef, O.Z.K., Hershkovitz, H., Yudelson, M., Stamper, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 73–80. International EDM Society, Worcester (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Narciss, S.: Designing and Evaluating Tutoring Feedback Strategies for digital learning environments on the basis of the Interactive Tutoring Feedback Model. Digital Education Review 23, 7–26 (2013), http://greav.ub.edu/der

    Google Scholar 

  13. Butler, D., Winne, P.: Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research 65, 245–281 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klieme, E., Leutner, D., Kenk, M.: Kompetenzmodellierung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 56, 9–11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., Melis, E.: Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers and Education 71, 56–76 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eichelmann, A., Narciss, S., Faulhaber, A., Melis, E.: Analyzing computer-based fraction tasks on the basis of a two-dimensional view of mathematics competencies. In: Zumbach, J., et al. (eds.) Beyond Knowledge: The Legacy of Competence. Meaningful Computer-based Learning Environments, pp. 125–134. Springer, Dordrecht (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Melis, E., Goguadze, G., Homik, M., Libbrecht, P., Ullrich, C., Winterstein, S.: Semantic-aware components and services of ActiveMath. British Journal of Educational Technology 37(3), 405–423 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sosnovsky, S., Dietrich, M., Andrès, E., Goguadze, G., Winterstein, S., Libbrecht, P., Siekmann, J., Melis, E.: Math-Bridge: Closing the Gaps in European Remedial Mathematics with Technology-Enhanced Learning. In: Wassong, T., et al. (eds.) Mit Werkzeugen Mathematik und Stochastik lernen – Using Tools for Learning Mathematics and Statistics, pp. 437–451. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Goguadze, G.: Representation for interactive exercises. In: Carette, J., Dixon, L., Coen, C.S., Watt, S.M. (eds.) Calculemus/MKM 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5625, pp. 294–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goguadze, G., Melis, E.: One Exercise - Various Tutorial Strategies. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 755–757. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Schnaubert, L.: Kompetenzdiagnostik in der Mathematik: Konstruktion und empirische Evaluation von Bruchadditionsaufgaben auf Grundlage eines zwei-dimensionalen Kompetenzmodells, Fachrichtung Psychologie. Technische Universität Dresden (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eichelmann, A., Narciss, S., Schnaubert, L., Melis, E.: Typische Fehler bei der Addition und Subtraktion von Brüchen – Ein Review zu empirischen Fehleranalysen. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 33(1), 29–57 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Narciss, S., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., Melis, E.: Student Behavior in Error-Correction-Tasks and Its Relation to Perception of Competence. In: Kloos, C.D., Gillet, D., Crespo García, R.M., Wild, F., Wolpers, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2011. LNCS, vol. 6964, pp. 370–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Andres, E. (2014). Adapting Tutoring Feedback Strategies to Motivation. In: Rensing, C., de Freitas, S., Ley, T., Muñoz-Merino, P.J. (eds) Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities. EC-TEL 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8719. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11200-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11200-8_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11199-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11200-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics