Skip to main content

Causal Compositional Models in Valuation-Based Systems

  • Conference paper
  • 1202 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8764))

Abstract

This paper shows that Pearl’s causal networks can be described using compositional models in the valuation-based systems (VBS) framework. There are several advantages of using the VBS framework. First, VBS is a generalization of several uncertainty theories (e.g., probability theory, a version of possibility theory where combination is the product t-norm, Spohn’s epistemic belief theory, and Dempster-Shafer belief function theory). This implies that causal compositional models, initially described in probability theory, are now described in all uncertainty calculi that fit in the VBS framework. Second, using the operators of VBS, we describe how causal inference can be made in causal compositional models in an elegant and unifying algebraic way. This includes the computation of conditioning, and the computation of the effect of interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bína, V., Jiroušek, R.: Marginalization in multidimensional compositional models. Kybernetika 42(4), 405–422 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiroušek, R.: Foundations of compositional model theory. Int. J. of General Systems. 40(6), 623–678 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiroušek, R.: On causal compositional models: Simple examples. In: Laurent, A., Strauss, O., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R., et al. (eds.) IPMU 2014, Part I. CCIS, vol. 442, pp. 517–526. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jiroušek, R., Shenoy, P.P.: Compositional models in valuation-based systems. Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning 55(1), 277–293 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge Univ. Press, NY (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Shachter, R.: Evaluating influence diagrams. Operations Research 34(6), 871–882 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Shenoy, P.P.: Conditional independence in valuation-based systems. Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning 10(3), 203–234 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Shenoy, P.P.: No double counting semantics for conditional independence. In: Cozman, F.G., Nau, R., Seidenfeld, T. (eds.) Proc. of the 4th Int. Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications (ISIPTA 2005), pp. 306–314. SIPTA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jiroušek, R., Shenoy, P.P. (2014). Causal Compositional Models in Valuation-Based Systems. In: Cuzzolin, F. (eds) Belief Functions: Theory and Applications. BELIEF 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8764. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11191-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11191-9_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11190-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11191-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics