Skip to main content

Determinants of Product Value-Expressiveness: Another Look at Conspicuousness, Differentiation, and Common Usage

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 1986 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference

Abstract

This paper reports a study that examined the effects of product conspicuousness, product differentiation, and product common usage on product value-expressiveness.As expected, the results showed that product conspicuousness and product differentiation are positively related to product value-expressiveness, and that product common usage is negatively related to product value–expressiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bearden, William O. and Etzel, Michael J. (1982), "Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 184–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, Russell W. (1978), "Assessing the Effects of Visable Consumption Cues on Impression Formation," in H. K. Hunt (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 5), Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, Russell W. (1981), "Determinants of Consumption Cue Utilization in Impression Formation:An Associational Derivation and Experimental Verification," in K. B. Monroe (Ed.) Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 8), Ann Arbor, MI:Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, Russell W., Bahn, Kenneth D. and Mayer, R. N. (1982), "Developmental Recognition of Consumption Symbolism," Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, Russell W., Mayer, R. N., and Bahn, Kenneth D. (1981), "The Eye of the Beholder:Individual Differences in Perceptions of Consumption Symbolism," in Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research Annual Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, Francis S. (1957), "Group Influence in Marketing and Public Relations," in Rensis Likert and Samuel Hayes Jr. (Eds.), Some Applications of Behavioral Research, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 208–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, Timothy C. (1968), "Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change," in A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, and T. M. Ostram (Eds.), Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, New York:Academic Press, pp. 243–275.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihali, Mihaly and Rochberg-Halton (1981), The Meaning of Things:Domestic Symbols and the Self.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, Howard L., Olson, Jerry C, Dipboye, Robert L., and Barnaby, David L. (1971), "A Commodity Theory Analysis of Consumer Preference for Scarce Products," Proceedings, 79th Annual Convention, American Psychological Association, pp. 653–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid, P. N. (1972), "Some Effects of Dress Cues on Observational Accuracy:A Perceptual Estimate and Impression Formulation," Journal of Social Psychology, 86, 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Sidney J. (1959), "Symbols for Sale," Harvard Business Review, 37, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, J. M. and Spivey, W. A. (1981), "Product and Brand-User Stereotypes Among Social Classes," Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. Joseph (1982), "Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review," Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (December), 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. Joseph (1983), Social Cognition and Consumer Behavior.New York:Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. Joseph (1985), "Using Self-Congruity and Ideal Congruity to Predict Purchase Motivation," Journal of Business Research, 13 (June), 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soloman, Michael R. (1983), "The Role of Products as Social Stimuli:A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (December), 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szybillo, George (1975), "A Situational Influence on the Relationship of a Consumer Attribute to New Product Attractiveness," Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 652–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worchel, Stephen, Lee, Jerry, and Adweole, Akanbi (1975), "Effects of Supply and Demand on Ratings on Object Value," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 906–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varvoglis, Theofanis and Sirgy, M, Joseph (1984), "Interrelationship Between Utilitarian and Value-Expressive Attributes of Store Image," in Jay Lindquist (Ed.), Developments in Marketing Science (Vol. 7), Kalamazoo, MI:Academy of Marketing Science, pp. 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sirgy, M.J., Johar, J.S., Wood, M. (2015). Determinants of Product Value-Expressiveness: Another Look at Conspicuousness, Differentiation, and Common Usage. In: Malhotra, N. (eds) Proceedings of the 1986 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11101-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics