Skip to main content

Student Evaluations in a Business Administration Curriculum - A Marketing Viewpoint

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1411 Accesses

Abstract

There are two opposing viewpoints, both well supported in the literature, concerning student evaluations of teaching performance. The first view holds that students can and should evaluate teaching performance and that the evaluation will correlate well with learning outcomes. The second viewpoint is that, while the students may be measuring something, probably satisfaction, their evaluations may differ markedly from the level of true learning taking place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Center for Research on Learning and Teaching. "Student Evaluation of Teaching. Criteria for the Evaluation, Support and Recognition of College Teachers. Number 2" National Project III, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, Terence J., and Michael T. Kane. "The Generalizibility of Student Ratings of Instructors: Item Specificity and Section Effects." Research in Higher Education 15B (1981) p. 305–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Kenneth O., Jr. and Leslie I. Crichton. "Student, Peer, and Self Evaluations of College Instructors." Journal of Educational Psychology. (70) (October 1978) pp. 815–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Otis D. "Path Analysis: Sociological Examples" The American Journal of Sociology Vol. 72, No. 1 (July 1966) pp. 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillmore, Gerald M. "How Large is the Course Effect? A Note on Romeny’s Course Effect vs. Teacher Effect on Students Rating of Teacher Competence." Research in Higher Education. (7) 1977. pp. 187–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, John E. and Liya Kremer. "Course Evaluation and Attitude Toward College Teaching." Higher Education Vol. 12, No. 6, (Dec. 1983) p. 681–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marg, Elwin. "How to Sacrifice Academic Quality." Improving College and University Teaching. 27 (Spring 1979) p. 54–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, et. al. Research on the Characteristics of Effective College Teaching. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1964 (ED002948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, Miriam, and Burton Rodin. "Student Evaluation of Teachers." Science; 177 (September 1972) pp. 1164–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Owen. "The Effect of Item Content on Students’ Global Appraisals of College Instructions." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA (March 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Geer, John P. Introduction to Multivariate Analysis for the Social Science. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lundsten, L.L. (2015). Student Evaluations in a Business Administration Curriculum - A Marketing Viewpoint. In: Malhotra, N. (eds) Proceedings of the 1986 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11101-8_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics