Advertisement

Brain Neural Data Analysis Using Machine Learning Feature Selection and Classification Methods

  • Lachezar Bozhkov
  • Petia Georgieva
  • Roumen Trifonov
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 459)

Abstract

The Electroencephalogram (EEG) is a powerful instrument to collect vast quantities of data about human brain activity. A typical EEG experiment can produce a two-dimensional data matrix related to the human neuronal activity every millisecond, projected on the head surface at a spatial resolution of a few centimeters. As in other modern empirical sciences, the EEG instrumentation has led to a flood of data and a corresponding need for new data analysis methods. This paper summarizes the results of applying supervised machine learning (ML) methods to the problem of classifying emotional states of human subjects based on EEG. In particular, we compare six ML algorithms to distinguish event-related potentials, associated with the processing of different emotional valences, collected while subjects were viewing high arousal images with positive or negative emotional content. 98% inter-subject classification accuracy based on the majority of votes between all classifiers is the main achievement of this paper, which outperforms previous published results.

Keywords

emotion valence recognition feature selection Event Related Potentials (ERPs) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Calvo, R.A., D’Mello, S.K.: Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and their Applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 1(1), 18–37 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dalgleish, T., Dunn, B., Mobbs, D.: Affective Neuroscience: Past, Present, and Future. Emotion Rev. 1, 355–368 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olofsson, J.K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., Polich, J.: Affective Picture Processing: An Integrative Review of ERP Findings. Biological Psychology 77, 247–265 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    AlZoubi, O., Calvo, R.A., Stevens, R.H.: Classification of EEG for Emotion Recognition: An Adaptive Approach. In: Proc. 22nd Australasian Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 52–61 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petrantonakis, P.C., Hadjileontiadis, L.J.: Emotion Recognition from EEC Using Higher Order Crossings. IEEE Trans. Information Technology in Biomedicine 14(2), 186–194 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jatupaiboon, N., Panngum, S., Israsena, P.: Real-Time EEG-Based Happiness Detection System. The ScientificWorld Journal, Article ID 618649, 12 pages (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Santos, I.M., Iglesias, J., Olivares, E.I., Young, A.W.: Differential effects of object-based attention on evoked potentials to fearful and disgusted faces. Neuropsychologia 46, 1468–1479 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pourtois, G., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., Vuilleumier, P.: Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces. Cerebral Cortex 14(6), 619–633 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    CS229 Machine Learning, Andrew Ng, http://cs229.stanford.edu/
  11. 11.
    Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fisher, R.A.: The Use of Multiple Measurements in Taxonomic Problems. Annals of Eugenics 7, 179–188 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Palaniappana, R., Ravi, K.V.R.: Improving visual evoked potential feature classification for person recognition using PCA and normalization (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lachezar Bozhkov
    • 1
  • Petia Georgieva
    • 2
  • Roumen Trifonov
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Systems DepartmentTechnical University of SofiaSofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.DETI/IEETAUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations