Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 2084 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to present the results of the data analysis using the research method as explained in Chap. 4. This chapter is organized as follows. Firstly, Sect. 5.2 presents the descriptive analysis which includes the industry category of the samples and descriptive analysis of measures of constructs. Secondly, Sect. 5.3 presents the discussions of the measure of model fit. Section 5.4 discusses the discriminant validity. At this stage, the examination of single-factor congeneric model and confirmatory analysis is presented. Section 5.5 discusses the reliability of the constructs, while Sect. 5.6 provides the results of the full structural model. The last section (Sect. 5.7) summarizes the content of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aryani, Y. A. (2009). The Effect of fairness perception of performance measurement in the balanced scorecard environment. Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Victoria University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, K. A., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2012). Business strategy, audit effort, and financial reporting irregularities. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30, 780–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blunch, N. J. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modeling using SPSS and AMOS (Vol. 1). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 205–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draghici, S. (2012). Statistics and data analysis for microarrays using R and bioconductor (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. (1983). Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis: A comment. The Journal of Consumer Research, 9(4), 443–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gani, L., & Jermias, J. (2006). Investigating the effect of board Independence on performance across different strategies. The International Journal of Accounting, 41, 295–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., & Tseng, C. Y. (2009). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 28, 301–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatahm, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S., Cunningham, E., & Coote, L. (2006). Structural equation modeling: From the fundamentals to advanced topics. Melbourne: Sream and Statsline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes-Smith, P. (2012). Structural equation modeling (using AMOS): From the fundamentals to advanced topics. Melbourne: School Research Evaluation and Measurement Services (SREAMS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, G. (2003). Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(1), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larcker, D. F., Richardson, S. A., & Tuna, I. (2007). Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. The Accounting Review, 82(4), 963–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiker, V., Navissi, F., & Sridharan, V. (2009). The agency cost effects of unionization on firm value. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 20, 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazari, J. A. (2010). An investigation of the relationship between the intellectual capital components and firm’s financial performance. Doctor of Philosophy thesis, University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. Z. (1998). The role of accounting in the East Asian financial crisis: Lessons learned. Transnational Corporations, 7(3), 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S. K. (1992). Effects of ignoring correlated measurement error in structural equation models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(3), 549–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wibowo, A. (2008). The impact of organizational culture and internal corporate governance on organizational performance in Indonesian Companies. Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfle, L. M., & Ethington, C. A. (1986). Within-variable, between occasion error covariances in models of educational achievement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46(3), 571–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2010). The 2010 corporate governance ROSC for Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yatim, P. (2009). Board structures and the establishment of a risk management committee by Malaysian listed firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 14, 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., & Zhou, N. (2007). Audit committee quality, Auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26, 300–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spira, L. F., & Page, M. (2003). Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Accounting Auditing & Accountability, 16(4), 640–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ghofar, A., Islam, S.M.N. (2015). Results. In: Corporate Governance and Contingency Theory. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10996-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics