Skip to main content

An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Sales Supervisory Behavior and Salesforce Job Satisfaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Marketing Horizons: A 1980's Perspective

Abstract

Based upon the empirical and theoretical literature, a model of the relationship between sales supervision and salesforce job satisfaction is developed and empirically tested. The model hypothesizes that salesmen will experience greater job satisfaction when they receive more performance feedback and more opportunity to participate in their supervisor’s decision making processes, and when they have supervisors who are high on consideration and initiation of structure. In addition, because of recent empiriqal evidence suggesting a possible consideration/initiation of structure interaction effect on job satisfaction, a hypothesized interaction effect was examined in this study. The results suggest the provision of performance feedback is an important predictor of job satisfaction. Furthermore, the results indicate the sales supervisor’s consideration and initiation of structure are related to the salesman’s satisfaction with certain aspects of the job. Participation and consideration/initiation of structure interaction were not found to be significant predictors of salesforce job satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • J. P. Campbell, M. D. Dunnette, E. E. Lawler, and K. E. Weick, Jr., Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. A. Churchill, Jr., N. M. Ford, and O. C. Walker, Jr., "Organizational Climate and Job Satisfaction in the Salesforce," Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (November, 1976), 323–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Cohen and P, Cohen, Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. A. Fleishman and E. F. Harris, "Patterns of Leadership Behavior Related to Employee Grievances and Turnover," Personnel Psychology, 15 (Spring, 1962), 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. A. Fleishman, E. F. Harris, and H. E. Burtt, Leadership and Supervision in Industry, Ohio State University, Bureau of Educational Research, Columbus, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Hackman and G. R. Oldham, "The Job Diagnostic Survey: An Instrument for the Diagnosis of Jobs and the Evaluation of Job Design Projects," Technical Report Number 4, Department of Administrative Sciences, Yale University, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. House, "A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness, " Administrative Science Quarterly, 16 (September, 1971), 321–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. House and G. Dessler, "The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership: Some Post Hoc and A Priori Tests," in Contingency Approaches to Leadership, James G. Hunt and Lars L. Hunt, eds., Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. House, A. C. Filley, and S. Kerr, "Relation of Leader Consideration and Initiating Structure to R and D. Subordinate’s Satisfaction," Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 16 (March, 1971), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. A. O’Reilly, III and K. H. Roberts, "Supervisor Influence and Subordinate Mobility Asperation as Moderators of Consideration and Initiation of Structure,". Journal of Applied Psychology, 63 (February, 1978), 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. P. Sims, Jr. and A. D. Sziloggi, "Leader Structure and Subordinate Satisfaction for Two Hospital Administrative Levels: A Path Analysis Approach," Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (April, 1975), 194–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. C. Smith, L. M. Kendall, and C. L. Hulin, The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Stogdill, Manual for Leadership Behavior Description Questionnaire, Form XII, Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research, Columbus, Ohio, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. K. Teas, "Empirical Tests of Linkages Proposed in the Walker, Churchill, and Ford Model of Salesforce Motivation and Performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, forthcoming (Spring, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. K. Teas, J. G. Wacker, and R. E. Hughes, "A Path Analysis of Causes and Consequences of Salespeople’s Perceptions of Role Clarity," Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (August, 1979), 355–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Tosi, "Organizational Stress as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Influence and Role Response," Academy of Management Journal, 14 (March, 1971), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Teas, R.K., Horrell, J.F. (2015). An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Sales Supervisory Behavior and Salesforce Job Satisfaction. In: Bellur, V. (eds) Marketing Horizons: A 1980's Perspective. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10966-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics