Abstract
This book is a critical analysis of the major controversy that has gripped marine governance during the last 20 years—the vexed issue of marine reserves (MRs). Much of the book has concentrated on assessing the credentials of one side of this controversy—the nature protectionist (NP) argument in favour of MRs—because it was responsible for the most extraordinary speed with which marine protected areas (MPAs) rose up the academic agenda to become the most discussed policy measure in the scientific fisheries literature across the globe in recent years. The book also analysed the growing opposition to the NP perspective in the shape of the social conservationist (SC) argument, which is not opposed to selective siting of MRs, but rejects indiscriminate or blanket designations of networks of MRs based on flimsy data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Though, the inclusion of wider society in the production of scientific knowledge may have implications for quality control (Funtowicz and Ravetz 1991).
- 2.
However, a Royal Society survey concluded that ‘there was concern that many scientists still see the main reason for engaging with the public as the need to “educate” them rather than to debate, listen and learn as part of a genuine dialogue’ (Royal Society 2006, p. 14).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Caveen, A., Polunin, N., Gray, T., Stead, S. (2015). Conclusion. In: The Controversy over Marine Protected Areas. SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10957-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10957-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10956-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10957-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)