Abstract
The Internet has changed the media consumption patterns during the last decade and half. Many newspaper organizations are struggling with the aim of turning their online news into profitable products. In this task it is crucial to first (1) understand consumer behavior in the Internet and then (2) assess the relationship of this behavior with consumers’ willingness to pay for the content of newspaper websites. In the present study we explore the above mentioned two issues. First, this study contributes to the theory of consumer behavior in the Internet. While advances have been made in studying consumers' Internet behavior, the main focus in the past studies was the potential risk of cannibalization, where newspaper websites and Internet news were expected to draw audience from traditional printed newspapers. As a consequence, the researchers spent their efforts on studying consumers’ choice between printed newspapers and their online versions (see e.g. Flavian & Gurrea, 2009a). Recently, however, it has been acknowledged that a large proportion of consumers are actually ‘hybrid’ or ‘multi-platform’ readers. For example, a recent study on U.S. consumers indicated that consumers of local newspapers are mainly ‘hybrid readers’, who read the news both from printed newspapers and their websites (Chyi et al., 2010). In the light of these recent findings, it seems that the assumption of pure choice between printed and online newspapers does not hold, and further understanding on the nature of this ‘multi-platform use’ is needed. The past studies have revealed that consumers have different motivations for reading a newspaper (see e.g. Flavián & Gurrea, 2007a; 2009b), but no studies to our knowledge have yet assessed the consumer motivations for the multi-platform use in this context. The websites of the newspapers offer also more interactive content than traditional printed newspapers, and therefore the motivations for the multi-platform use need to be assessed separately. Basing our work on the uses and gratifications (hereafter U&G) theory (see e.g. Katz, Blumler, & Gurevitch, 1974; Rubin, 2002), according to which consumers have varying motivations to use media, we explore consumer segments that differ in their multi-platform use patterns. Secondly, since the different consumer segments have different motivations to use newspaper websites, we assume that their value perceptions of these websites differ also. We operationalize consumers’ value perceptions as their willingness-to-pay (hereafter WTP) and we apply Homburg et al.'s (2005) proposed model of nonlinear relationship between consumers’ WTP and satisfaction to explore the differences in the levels of willingness to pay for the digital content between the identified consumer segments. Based on above, we derived two research questions:
-
Research Question 1: Can consumers be segmented by their multiplatform newspaper consumption patterns?
-
Research Question 2: How do the consumer segments differ in terms of their willingness to pay for newspaper websites?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bergkvist, L. and J.R. Rossiter. (2007). “The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item Versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs.” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (2): 175–184.
Burbidge, J.B., L. Magee and A.L. Robb. (1988). “Alternative Transformations to Handle Extreme Values of the Dependent Variable.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83 (401): 123–127.
Chyi, H.I, M.J. Yang, S.C. Lewis and N. Zheng. (2010). “Use of Satisfaction with Newspaper Sites in the Local Market: Exploring Differences between Hybrid and Online-Only Users.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87 (1): 62–83.
Flavián, C., M. Guinaliu and R. Gurrea. (2006). “The Role Played by Perceived Usability, Satisfaction and Consumer Trust on Website Loyalty.” Information & Management, 43: 1–14.
Flavián, C. and R. Gurrea. (2009a). “Digital versus traditional newspapers: Influences on perceived substitutability.” InternationalJournal of Market Research, 51 (5): 635–
Flavián, C. and R. Gurrea. (2009b). “Users’ Motivations and Attitude Towards the Online Press.” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(3): 164–174.
Flavián, C. and R. Gurrea. (2007a). “Perceived Substitutability between Digital and Physical Channels: the Case of Newspapers.” Online Information Review, 31 (6): 793–813.
Flavián, C. and R. Gurrea. (2007b). “Duality of Newspaper Distribution Channels: An Analysis of Readers’ Motivations.” International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 77 (1): 63–78.
Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham and W. Black. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Homburg, C., Nicole Koschate and W.D. Hoyer. (2005). “Do Satisfied Customers Really Pay More? A Study of the Relationship Between Customer Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay.” Journal of Marketing 69 (April): 84–96.
Katz, E., J.G. Blumner and M. Gurevitch. (1974). “Uses and Gratifications Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 37 (4): 509–523.
Layton, D.E. (2001). “Alternative Approaches for Modeling Concave Willingness To Pay Functions In Conjoint Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(5): 1314–1320.
Miller, K. M., R. Hofstetter, H. Krohmer and Z.J. Zhang. (2011). “How Should Consumers’ Willingness to Pay Be Measured? An Empirical Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches.” Journal of Marketing Research 48 (1): 172–184.
Rubin, A. (2002). “Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective.” In Media Effects: Advances in theory and research. Eds. J. Bryant and D. Zillmann. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tarkiainen, A., Arminen, H., Kuivalainen, O. (2015). Consumers’ Different Website Use Patterns and Value Perceptions in the Context of Local Newspapers. In: Robinson, L. (eds) Marketing Dynamism & Sustainability: Things Change, Things Stay the Same…. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10912-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10912-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10911-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10912-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)