Abstract
The term ‘corporate social responsibility’ (CSR) is considered by the new Marxist left to be a self-defeating oxymoron. In this chapter, the new Marxist challenge to CSR as a meaningful, coherent concept and practice is discussed. In the wake of the financial crisis the critique from the Marxist-inspired left tends to replace the scepticism of the libertarian right (Friedman 1970). The legitimacy of business in society is at stake, and the critical left is well placed to debunk the integrity of business’s claim to social responsibility.
To provide an overview of current Marxist inspired CSR thinking, this chapter introduces the Hegelian inspired critique of a New Spirit of Capitalism (Chiapello 2013) as well as the critique of ideology targeted at the neo-liberal project of corporate responsibility (Žižek 2008; Fleming and Jones 2013).
Subsequently, two possible liberal ‘revisions’ to the Marxist inspired scepticism of CSR are presented and discussed: first, the theory of a social connection model (Young 2006), and then the theory of deliberative democracy and political CSR (Scherer and Palazzo 2011).
Finally, the chapter concludes with a plea to reconsider the classical Marxist concept of exploitation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34, 51–79.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism (trans: Elliott, G.). London: Verso.
Cederström, C., & Marinetto, M. (2013). Corporate social responsibility á la the Liberal Communist’. Organization, 20(3), 416–432.
Chiapello, E. (2013). Capitalism and its new criticisms. In P. Du Gay & G. Morgan (Eds.), New spirits of capitalism?: Crises, justifications and dynamics (pp. 60–81). Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
Cohen, G. A. (1995). Self-ownership, freedom and equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fleming, P., & Jones, M. (2013). The end of corporate social responsibility: Capitalism, crisis and critique. London: Sage.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. The New York Times Magazine.
Hanlon, G. (2008). Rethinking corporate social responsibility and the role of the firm — On the denial of politics. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 156–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, C., Parker, M., & Ten Bos, R. (2005). For business ethics. London: Routledge.
Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Marazzi, C. (2011). The violence of financial capitalism, new edition. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Pogge, T. (2002). World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society – The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 12, 78–92.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples: With the ‘idea of public reason’ revisited. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Richter, U. H. (2010). Liberal thought in reasoning on CSR’. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 625–649.
Ruggie, J. (2008). Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. The Human Rights Council. A/HRC/8/5. 7 Apr 2008.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–930.
Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality’. Economy & Society, 37, 1–19.
Solomon, R. C. (1992). Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelean approach to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(3), 317–339.
Taylor, C. (1995). Hegel and modern society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Young, I. M. (2006). Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23, 102–130.
Žižek, S. (2008). On violence. London: Profile Books.
Acknowledgements
Versions of this paper has been presented at several places. I am therefore grateful to the audiences at ‘The Buck Stops Where – Responsibility in the Global Economy’ conference at University College London, on the 21th May 2014, the Eben Conference on the 14th June in Berlin, and the ‘Global Corporate Governance Institute’, First Annual Conference, 14th August at the University of Surrey. In particular I would like to thank Guido Palazzo, Steven Sampson and Kristin Saghaug for good comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toft, K.H. (2015). Liberal CSR and New Marxist Criticism. In: Idowu, S., Frederiksen, C., Mermod, A., Nielsen, M. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility and Governance. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10909-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10909-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10908-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10909-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)