Advertisement

Improving Quality and Performance of Facility Management Using Building Information Modelling

  • Heap-Yih Chong
  • Jun Wang
  • Wenchi Shou
  • Xiangyu Wang
  • Jun Guo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8683)

Abstract

Poor facility management has been attributed to lack of coordination and information during the maintenance process. The need for high quality applies not only to construction works and workmanship, but is also for its subsequent coordination and maintenance of a building. The paper aims to improve quality and performance of maintenance by integrating an advanced technology with a managerial approach, namely, building information modelling (BIM) and facility management. A BIM case study was investigated, which was located in Shanghai, China. Five significant areas were identified to improve the quality and performance of facility management, namely, centralized system, visualization, simplification, modifiable system, and smart emergency escape. The results highlight the benefits in applying the integrated system between BIM and facility management. It draws an insightful inference in enhancing quality services in facility management.

Keywords

BIM Facility Management Integration Quality Benefits Case Study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Christensen, L.R.: Practices of Stigmergy in the Building Process. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 23(1), 1–19 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chong, H.Y., Zin, R.M.: Transforming of Construction Contract Administra-tion: Data Warehouse Modeling. In: 2011 Eighth International Conference on IEEE Information Technology: New Generations, ITNG (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chong, H.Y., Zin, R.M., Chong, S.C.: Employing Data Warehousing for Con-tract Administration: e-Dispute Resolution Prototype. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 139(6), 611–619 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chong, H.-Y., Zin, R.M.: Selection of dispute resolution methods: factor analysis approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 19(4), 428–443 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becerik-Gerber, B., Jazizadeh, F., Li, N., Calis, G.: Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 138(3), 431–442 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arayici, Y.: Towards building information modelling for existing structures. Structural Survey 26(3), 210–222 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh, V., Gu, N., Wang, X.: A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform. Automation in Construction 20(2), 134–144 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sabol, L.: Building Information Modeling & Facility Management. IFMA World Workplace, Dallas, Tex., USA (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brinda, T.N., Prasanna, E.: Developments of Facility Management Using Building Information Modelling. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 3(4), 11379–11386 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hou, L., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Maynard, N., et al.: Combining Photogrammetry and Augmented Reality Towards an Integrated Facility Management System for the Oil Industry. Proceedings of the IEEE 102(2), 204–220 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boukamp, F., Akinci, B.: Automated processing of construction specifications to support inspection and quality control. Automation in Construction 17(1), 90–106 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Akinci, B., Boukamp, F., Gordon, C., Huber, D., et al.: A formalism for utilization of sensor systems and integrated project models for active construction quality control. Automation in Construction 15(2), 124–138 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Straub, A., van Mossel, H.J.: Contractor selection for performance‐based maintenance partnerships. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 11(2), 65–76 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zavadskas, E.K., Vilutienė, T.: A multiple criteria evaluation of multi-family apartment block’s maintenance contractors: I—Model for maintenance contractor evaluation and the determination of its selection criteria. Building and Environment 41(5), 621–632 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ventovuori, T.: Elements of sourcing strategies in fm services‐a multiple case study. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 10(4), 249–267 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, S., Xie, J.: Integrating Building Management System and facilities management on the Internet. Automation in Construction 11(6), 707–715 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, J., Jeong, Y., Oh, Y.-S., Lee, J.-C., et al.: An integrated approach to intelligent urban facilities management for real-time emergency response. Automation in Construction 30, 256–264 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Volk, R., Stengel, J., Schultmann, F.: Building Information Modeling (BIM) for existing buildings—Literature review and future needs. Automation in Construction 38, 109–127 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gross, T.: Supporting effortless coordination: 25 years of awareness research. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22(4-6), 425–474 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Atkin, B., Brooks, A.: Total facilities management. John Wiley & Sons (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kull, T.J., Wacker, J.G.: Quality management effectiveness in Asia: The influence of culture. Journal of Operations Management 28(3), 223–239 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stage, F.K., Manning, K.: Research in the college context: Approaches and methods. Psychology Press (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heap-Yih Chong
    • 1
  • Jun Wang
    • 1
  • Wenchi Shou
    • 1
  • Xiangyu Wang
    • 1
  • Jun Guo
    • 2
  1. 1.Australiasian Joint Research Centre for Building Information ModellingCurtin UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.CCDI GroupChina

Personalised recommendations