Advertisement

Efficient Group Discussion with Digital Affinity Diagram System (DADS)

  • William Widjaja
  • Keito Yoshii
  • Makoto Takahashi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8683)

Abstract

Collaborative discussion is an integral part of exchanging ideas and solving important problems. However, traditional approaches to group discussion have used analog tools that create problems for collaborative contributions. Many researchers have tried to use technology to overcome these limitations, but current digital collaboration systems isolate users from each other and do not promote efficient idea creation or allow users space to support ideas with evidence. The Digital Affinity Diagram System (DADS) presents a solution that encourages better group discussion by implementing three features: 1) Separation of private and common areas during initial phase to allow ideas to mature without initial critique 2) Intuitive input and navigational design to help users create, edit, view and manipulate generated ideas, and 3) Multi-platform synchronization technology to create real-time visual feedback on the discussion accessible to all users. DADS’ dual-monitor setup uses real-time network socket infrastructure so that multiple users can interact with each other under one discussion environment. We capitalize on multi-touch hardware to create a natural, deep and structured collaborative environment.

Keywords

Human Factors Design Measurement CSCW Brainstorming Affinity-Diagram Idea-generation Collaboration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Osborn, A.: Applied imagination (1953)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sutton, R., Hargadon, A.: Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 685–718 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diehl, M., Stroebe, W.: Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(3), 497 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isaksen, S.G., Gaulin, J.P.: A reexamination of brainstorming research: Implications for research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly 49(4), 315–329 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kawakita, J.: The original kj method. Kawakita Research Institute, Tokyo (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mullen, B., Johnson, C., Salas, E.: Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 12(1), 3–23 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herrmann, T., Nolte, A.: The Integration of Collaborative Process Modeling and Electronic Brainstorming in Co-located Meetings. In: Kolfschoten, G., Herrmann, T., Lukosch, S. (eds.) CRIWG 2010. LNCS, vol. 6257, pp. 145–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geyer, F., Pfeil, U., Budzinski, J., Höchtl, A., Reiterer, H.: Affinitytable-a hybrid surface for supporting affinity diagramming. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haller, M., Leitner, J., Seifried, T., Wallace, J.R., Scott, S.D., Richter, C., Brandl, P., Gokcezade, A., Hunter, S.: The nice discussion room: Integrating paper and digital media to support co-located group meetings. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 609–618. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burtner, E.R., May, R.A., Scarberry, R.E., LaMothe, R.R., Endert, A.: Affinity+: Semi-structured brainstorming on large displays. tech. rep., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA, US (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ballendat, T., Marquardt, N., Greenberg, S.: Proxemic interaction: designing for a proximity and orientation-aware environment. In: ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 121–130. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greenberg, S., Boyle, M., LaBerge, J.: Pdas and shared public displays: Making personal information public, and public information personal. Personal Technologies 3(1-2), 54–64 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paul, S.A., Morris, M.R.: Cosense: enhancing sensemaking for collaborative web search. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1771–1780. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Widjaja, W., Yoshii, K., Haga, K., Takahashi, M.: Discusys: Multiple user real-time digital sticky-note affinity-diagram brainstorming system. Procedia Computer Science 22, 113–122 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H.: A group process model for problem identification and program planning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 7(4), 466–492 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Widjaja
    • 1
  • Keito Yoshii
    • 1
  • Makoto Takahashi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management of Science and Technology, Graduate School of EngineeringTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations