Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lessons Learned From Dams Behavior Under Earthquakes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspectives on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 37))

Abstract

It is important to analyze embankment dam behavior from the past lessons learned. It is noticed that modern embankment dams withstand the design earthquake without significant damages. In spite of this scenario it is important to prevent the occurrence of incidents and accidents of embankment dams under earthquakes and so a deep understanding of the triggering factors is needed.

Well documented case histories from different regions of the world related with embankment dam behaviour were carefully selected and are discussed.

The design and the analysis of dam stability under seismic conditions are addressed. The new trend for performance basis design is to consider 2 levels of seismic actions and to analyse the situation when the limit of force balance is exceeded for high intensity ground motions associated with a very rare seismic event.

The reservoir triggered seismicity (RTS) is linked to dams higher than about 100 m or to large reservoirs (capacity greater than 500 × 106 m3), rate of reservoir filling and to new dams of smaller size located in tectonically sensitive areas.

Dam monitoring and inspections of dams are presented. Experience has shown that the rational and systematic control of dam safety should consist of several tasks: (i) regular instrumentation measurements; (ii) data validation; (iii) data storage; (iv) visual inspections; (v) safety evaluation; (vi) corrective actions.

The risks associated with dam projects are discussed. The potential risk associated with dams consists of structural components and socio-economic components. The structural components of potential risk depend mostly on storage capacity and on the height of the dam, as the potential downstream consequences are proportional to the mentioned values. Socio-economic risks can be expressed by a number of persons who need to be evacuated in case of danger and by potential downstream damage.

It is important to develop new ways of thinking and strategies to address the future challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambraseys NN (1960). The seismic stability of earth dams. Proceeding 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Vol II, pp 331–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Adams PD (1991) Reaapraisal of major African earthquakes using Raleigh-wave inverse and body-wave modelling

    Google Scholar 

  • Australia Geomechanics Society (2000) Landslide risk management concept and guidelines. Australia geomechanics society. Sub-Committee on Landslide Risk Management. Australia Geomechanics 35(1):49–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee NG, Seed HB, Chan CK (1979) Cyclic behavior of dense coarse-grained materials in relation to the seismic stability of dams. Report n UCB/EERC 79/13. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera S, Valenzuela L, Campana J (2011) Sand tailings dams. Design, construction and operation. Proceedings Tailings and Mine Waste 2011, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Benlala A (2003) Le barrage de Keddara face au seisme du 21 Mai 2003 et la securite du Grand Alger Suite au seisme de Boumerdes du 21 Mai 2003. Question 83-Seismic Aspects of Dams, ICOLD, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray JB (2007) Simplified seismic slope displacements procedures. In Pitilakis K (ed) Proceeding of 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering-Invited Lectures. Thessaloniki, pp 327–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Budweg FMG (1997) Incidents and failures of dams. 18th International Conference of Large Dams. Firenze, pp 751–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira L, Pimenta L, Silva Gomes A (2005) Framework of risk analysis and their application to embankment dams (in portuguese). Seminar on Dams- Technology, Safety and Interaction with the Society, Lisbon, pp 569–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter JP, Booker JR, Wroth CP (1982) A critical state soil model for cyclic loading. Soil mechanics transient and cyclic loads. Constitutive relations and numerical treatment. Wiley, pp 219–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H (2008) Considerations of dam safety after Wenchuan earthquake in China. Proceeding 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Special Session S13 Seismic Aspects of Large Embankment and Concrete Dams, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan J (2000) Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 126(4):307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Elms D (2000) Refinements to the Newmark Sliding Block Model. Paper n 2132. 12th WCEE, Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurocode 8 (1998a) Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. Part 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurocode 8 (1998b) Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures- Part 5: Foundations, Retaining Structures and Geotechnical Aspects

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli M (1994) Safety assessment and improvement of existing dams. Question 68, General Report. XVIII International Congress on Large Dams, pp 1523–1583

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn WDL (1987) Finite Element Handbook Chap. 3—Geomechanics. Mc. Graw-Hill Editors H. Hardestuncer

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas G (1987) Seismic response of earth dams: some recent developments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 6(1):2–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway JHH (1967) Installed instruments in Matahina earth dam. Proceeding 5th Aust. N.Z. Conference Soil Mech Found Eng, pp 147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilg B, Indermaur W, Matthey F, Pedro J, Azevedo M, Ferreira E (1987) Special design of steno arch dam in Greece in relation with possible faults movements. LNEC, Memória n 695

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon MD (1988) The observed Seismic behavior of the Matahina dam. Proceeding 2nd ICCHGE. Vol I, St. Louis, pp 841–848

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho K, Leroi E, Roberbs B (2000) Quantitative risk assessment: application, myths and future direction. GEO Eng, 2000, Melbourne, pp 269–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Iai S (2009) Discussion session on performance criteria for designing geotechnical. In: Kokusho T, Tsukamoto Y, Yoshimine M (ed) Proceeding of performance-based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering, Tokyo, pp 265–267

    Google Scholar 

  • ICE (Instituto Costrarricense de Electricidad) (2009) The Costa Rica earthquake of January 8, 2009. Strong Motion Recorded in Dams or Site Projects

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (1975) A review of earthquake resistant design of dams. Bulletin 27

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (1981) Automated observation for the safety control of dams. Bulletin 41

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (1983) Seismicity and dam design. Bulletin n 46

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (1988) Inspection of dams. Following earthquake—guidelines. Bulletin n 62

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (1989) Selection Seismic parameters for large dams—guidelines. Bulletin 72

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (1995) Dam failures, statistical analysis. Bulletin n 99

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (1998) Neotectonics and dams. Guidelines and case histories. Bulletin 112

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (1999) Seismic observation of dams. Guidelines and case studies. Bulletin 113

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (2001) Design features of dams to effectively resist seismic ground motions. Bulletin 120

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (2002) Earthquake design and evaluation of structures appurtenant to dams. Bulletin 123, Committee on Seismic aspects of dam design, ICOLD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (2005a) Dam foundations. Geologic considerations. Investigation methods. Treatment. Monitoring. Bulletin n 129

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (2005b) Risk assessment in dam safety management. Bulletin 130

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (2007) Historical review on ancient damss. Bulletin

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (2008b) Inspection of dams. Following earthquakeguidelines. Bulletin n 62. 2008 Revision

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (2009) Selection Seismic parameters for large dams—guidelines. Bulletin 72. 2009 Revision

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOLD (2010) Reservoirs and Seismicity. State of knowledge. Bulletin 137

    Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Lysmer J, Hwang R, e Seed HB (1973) Quad-4. A computer program for evaluating the seismic response of soil structures by variable damping finite elements. Report n UCB/EERC 73—16, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • INA (International Navigation Association) (2001) Seismic design guidelines for port structures. A.A. Balkema Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1756) Writings on the Lisbon earthquake. Portuguese edition of the three essays about earthquakes published in Konigsberg, Almendina, 135 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai SS, Seed HB (1985) Dynamic response of long Valley Dam in Mammoth Lake. Earthquake series of May 25–27 1980. Report N UCB/EERC 85/12, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempériere F (1999) Risk analysis: What sort should be applied and to which dams? The International Journal on Hydropower Dams 6:128–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee MK, Finn WLL (1978) DESRA 2, Dynamic effective stress response analysis of soil deposits with energy transmitting boundary including assessment of liquefaction potential. Soil Mechanics series n 38. Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Wang W, Yang X, Yu P, Gao F (1979) Preliminary investigation of damages in the earth dam of Douhe reservoir caused by Tangshan earthquake of 1976. the Haike River Design Institute, Beijing, P.R.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysmer J, Udaka T, Tsai C, Seed HB (1974) A computer program for approximate 3D analysis of soil-structure interaction problems. Report n UCB/EERC 74—4. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysmer J, Udaka T, Seed HB, Hwang R (1975) LUSH 2- A computer program for complex response analysis of soil-structure systems. Report n UCB/EERC 75—30. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Makdisi FI, Seed HB (1977) A simplified procedure for estimating earthquake induced deformations in dams and embankments. Report n EERC 79—19. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Masukawa S, Yasunaka M, Kohgo Y (2004) Dynamic failure and deformations of dam-models in shaking table testes. Proceeding of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto N (2011) Fujinuma dam inspection after 2011 Tohoku earthquake. 4th Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto N, Takahashi M, Sato F (1985) Repairing the concrete facing of Minase Rockfill dam. 15th ICOLD, Lausanne, Vol IV, Q.59, R.13, pp 203–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Mroz Z, Norris VA, Zienkiewicz OC (1979) Application of an anisotropic hardening model in the analysis of elasto-plastic deformation of soils. Advanced Topics and New Developments in Finite Element Analysis, Portoroz, pp 18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadim F (2002) Probabilistic methods for Geohazard problems. In: R Poettler et al (eds) State-of-the-art in probabilistics in geotechnics: technical and economical risk estimation. pub VGE Essen. Germany, pp 333–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique 15(2):139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolayevskiy VN (1982) Earth crust, dilatancy and earthquakes. Section of book on focal mechanics of earthquakes. Kir, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Nose M, Baba K (1980) Dynamic behaviour of Rockfill dams. Dams and earthquakes. Proceeding of a Conference at I.C.E., pp 69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevost JH (1993) Nonlinear dynamic response analysis of soil and soil-structures interacting systems. Proceeding of the seminar on soil dynamics and geotechnical earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Sêco e Pinto, Publisher A. Balkema

    Google Scholar 

  • Priscu R (1979) The behaviour of Romanian dams during the Vrancea earthquake of March 4, 1977. 13th ICOLD, New Delhi, Vol II Q51, pp 995–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Resendiz D, Romo PM, Moreno E (1982) El Infiernillo and La Villita dams: Seismic behavior. JGED, ASCE 108(GT1):109–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Retamal E, Musante H, Ortigosa P (1989) The behaviour of earth dams in Chile during the 1985. Proceeding 12th ICSMFE. Rio de Janeiro,Vol 3, pp 1995–2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon GM, Hartford DND (1995) Risk analysis for dam safety. International Water Power Dam Construction, March, pp 42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma SH (1975) Seismic stability of earth dams and embankments. Geotechnique 25(4):743–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma SH, Chowdhury R (1996) Simulation of Pore pressure in earth structures during earthquakes. 11th WCEE, Acapulco, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) Shake: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Report n UCB/EERC 72—12. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Sêco e Pinto PS (1993) Dynamic analysis of embankment dams. In: Sêco e Pinto (ed) Soil dynamics and geotechnical earthquake engineering seminar. Balkema Publisher. pp 159–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Sêco e Pinto PS (2001) Dam engineering- earthquake aspects. Special Lecture. Proceeding of 4th ICSDEE, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Sêco e Pinto PS (2002) Some reflections about risk analysis of geotechnical structures. Proceeding of 12th Danube- European Conference Geotechnical Engineering, Passau, pp 41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Sêco e Pinto PS (2004) Dams, embankment and slopes. General Report. Proceeding of 5th ICCHGE, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sêco e Pinto PS (2006) Dam engineering-new challenges. Schezy Lecture, Budapest, 33 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Sêco e Pinto PS (2009a) Interaction between eurocode 7-geotechnical design and eurodoe 8-design for earthquake resistance of geotechnical design concept. Special Lecture. In: Honjo Y, Susuki M, Hara T, Zhang F (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Geotechnical Safety Risk, Gifu. Gifu Conference, pp 51–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Sêco e Pinto PS (2009b) Seismic behaviour of geotechnical structures-past, present and future. In: Kokusho T, Tsukamoto Y, Yoshimine M (eds) Proceeding of performance-based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering, Tokyo, pp 341–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB (1980) Earthquake-resistant design of earth dams. Symposium and practice of dam engineering, Bangkok, pp 41–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Martin GR (1966) The Seismic coefficient in earth dam design. JSMFD, ASCE 92(SM3):59–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Lee KL, Idriss IM (1969) Analysis of sheffield dam failure. JSMFD, ASCE 95(SM6):1453–1490

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Lee KL, Idriss IM, Makdisi F (1973) Analysis of the slides in the San Fernando dams during the earthquake of Feb 9 1971. University of California. Report N.EERC 73—2

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalaby A (1995) High Aswan dam and Seismicity. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Seismic and Environmental Aspects of Dams Design Earth, Concrete and Tailing Dams, Chile, pp 507–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen ZJ (1981) Dynamically coupled percolation and deformation analysis of earth dams. Proceeding ICRAGEESD. Vol I, St. Louis, pp 389–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenouda WK (1982) Quality control and testing methods as exercised in the Aswan high dam. 14th International Conference on Large Dams, Rio de Janeiro, Q.55. R. 58, pp 1047–1065

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherard JL, Cluff LS, Allen CR (1974) Potentially active faults in dam foundations. Geotechnique 24(3):367–428

    Google Scholar 

  • SRB—Subcommission of Dam Codes (1990) Dams safety code (in portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart R (2000) Dam risk management. GEO Eng. Melbourne, pp 721–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura C (1986) Behaviors of dams in Mexico September 19, 1985. Bulletin of Earthquake Resistant Structure Research Center N 19. Inst. of Industrial Science. University of Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Taucer F (2005) Recent advances and future needs in experimental earthquake engineering. CASCADE Series Report N 7, Published by LNEC, Lisbon (ISBN 972-49-1971-4)

    Google Scholar 

  • TC4 ISSMGE (2001) Case histories of post-liquefaction remediation. Committee on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokimatsu K, Susuki H, Tabata K, Sato M (2007) Three dimensional shaking table tests on soil pile structures models using e-defense facility. 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, June 25–28, Thissaloniki, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • Towhata I (2008) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Springler

    Google Scholar 

  • Towhata I et al (2011) On Gigantic Tohoku pacific earthquake in Japan. Earthquake news. Bulletin of the international society for soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Vol 5, Issue 2. April

    Google Scholar 

  • Udias A, Arroyo AL (2005) The Lisbon earthquake of 1755 in Spanish contemporary authors. 250th Anniversary of the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake, Lisbon, pp 19–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulloa CR (1987) Effect of the September 1985 earthquakes on dams built on the Balsas River. El Caracol Dam. Comission Federal de Electricidad. Report n 64

    Google Scholar 

  • USCOLD (1997) Reservoir Triggered Seismicity

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo R, Peters G (2009) Observed Seismic behavior of three Chilean large dams. In: Kokusho T (ed) Earthquake geotechnical case histories for performance based design. pp 409–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltaire (1759) Candide. Oeuvres completes, 9 vol, edit. Moland, Paris 1877

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanagisawa E, Fukui T (1980) Performance of the Tarumizu Rockfill dam during strong earthquake. Proceeding 7th WCEE. Instanbul, Vol 8, pp 133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav SM, Mishra R, Samtani BK (2008) Rehabilitation of earthquake affected Tapar Dam, Gujarat, India. Proceeding of the 12th International Conference of IACMAG, Goa, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan L, Lun KY (2003) Liquefaction of Gravelly soils. Q 83, 21 st ICOLD, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda S et al (2010) Geotechnical damage caused by the 2010 Maule, Chile, earthquake. ISSMGE Bulletin, Vol 4, Issue 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonezawa T, Uemura Y, Okmoto I (1987) An analysis of the dynamic behavior of a Rockfill dam during an earthquake with waves of high frequency. International Symposium of Earthquakes Dams Beijing, Vol 1, pp 324–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenshao W (1987) Lessons from earthquake damages of earth dams in China. International Symposium on Earthquakes Dams Beijing China, Vol 1, pp 243–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland M (2003) Seismic aspects of dams. General Report Q 83, 21 st ICOLD, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland M (2008) Review of Seismic design criteria of large concrete and Embankment dams. 73rd Annual Meeting of ICOLD, Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Laboratory of Civil Engineering (LNEC), Geotechnical Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Prof. Pedro Simão Sêco e Pinto

Authors
  1. Prof. Pedro Simão Sêco e Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Simão Sêco e Pinto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, Özyeǧin University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Atilla Ansal

  2. Faculty of Engineering Geotechnical Eng. Research Group, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

    Mohamed Sakr

Annex 1

Annex 1

Table A1 Behavior of embankment dams during earthquakes
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sêco e Pinto, P. (2015). Lessons Learned From Dams Behavior Under Earthquakes. In: Ansal, A., Sakr, M. (eds) Perspectives on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 37. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10786-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation