Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nonlinear Deformation Analyses of Liquefaction Effects on Embankment Dams

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspectives on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 37))

Abstract

Nonlinear deformation analyses (NDAs) are used for evaluating the potential effects of liquefaction on the seismic performance of embankment dams. NDAs provide insights on potential failure modes and serve as a basis for generating fragility curves for risk analyses. Confidence in these applications of NDAs may be significantly improved by establishing calibration and analysis protocols that reduce undesirable sources of variability between analysis results obtained by different analysts or different models. A key protocol for improving the quality of NDAs is the calibration and validation of a constitutive model using single-element simulations with the types of loading paths potentially important to the structure's response. These simulations provide a basis for evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the constitutive models and for identifying likely causes of differences between different modeling approaches. Examples of single-element simulations are presented for several constitutive models and loading paths to illustrate some of the important features for NDAs of embankment dams affected by liquefaction. The benefits of NDA studies also depend on the numerical procedures and results being sufficiently documented so that knowledgeable users can critique and interpret the results. Insights from parametric analyses should be adequately demonstrated so that members of the project team can exercise judgments regarding their practical implications. Recommendations on NDA documentation requirements are presented, along with an example of how such documentation can be important for the interpretation of NDA results. Critical examinations of NDA models and modeling procedures are necessary for identifying weaknesses, fostering improvements, and increasing confidence in their use for evaluating the seismic performance of embankment dams affected by liquefaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson L, Ruthford M, Perlea V, Serafini D, Montgomery J, Bowles D (2011) Risk assessment of success dam, California: flood related potential failure modes. GeoRisk 2011, ASCE, pp 902–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrianopoulos KI, Papadimitriou AG, Bouckovalas GD (2010) Bounding surface plasticity model for the seismic liquefaction analysis of geostructures. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 30:895–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaty MH, Byrne PM (2011) UBCSAND constitutive model: version 904aR. Documentation report: UBCSAND constitutive model on Itasca UDM Web Site, February 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW (2003) Relating Kα to relative state parameter index. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 129(8):770–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2004) State normalization of penetration resistances and the effect of overburden stress on liquefaction resistance. In: D Doolin et al (ed) Proceeding 11th international conference on soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, and 3rd international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering. Stallion Press, Vol 2, pp 484–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2011) Cyclic failure and liquefaction: current issues. 5th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Santiago, Jan 10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Ziotopoulou K (2012) PM4Sand (Version 2): a sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications. Report No. UCD/CGM-12/01, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of California, Davis, p 100

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Ziotopoulou K (2013) Formulation of a sand plasticity plane-strain model for earthquake engineering applications. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng Elsevier 53:254–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Seed RB, Chan CK, Seed HB, Sousa JB (1991) Liquefaction behavior of saturated sands under uni-directional and bi-directional monotonic and cyclic simple shear loading. Geotechnical engineering report No. UCB/GT/91-08, University of California, Berkeley, p 521, August

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Wilson DW, Idriss IM (2012) Examination and re-evaluation of SPT-based liquefaction triggering case histories. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 138(8):898–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles D, Ruthford M, Anderson L (2011) Risk assessment of success dam, California: evaluation of operating restrictions as an interim measure to mitigate earthquake risk. Geo-Risk 2011 ASCE, pp 586–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne P, Park S, Beaty M, Sharp M, Gonzalez L, Abdoun T (2004) Numerical modeling of liquefaction and comparison with centrifuge tests. Can Geotech J 41(2):193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubrinovski M (2011) Seismic effective stress analysis: modelling and application. 5th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Santiago, Jan 10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubrinovski M, Ishihara K (1998) State concept and modified elastoplasticity for sand modelling. Soils Found 38(4):213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafalias YF, Manzari M (2004) Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects. J Eng Mech ASCE 130(6):622–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson EM, Roth WH, Nesarajah S, Bureau G, Davis CA (2001) A practice oriented pore pressure generation model. 2nd FLAC symposium on numerical modeling in geomechanics, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn WDL, Wu G (2013) Dynamic analyses of an earthfill dam on over-consolidated silt with cyclic strain softening. Seventh international conference on case histories in geotechnical earthquake engineering, Chicago, April 29-May 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin E, Harkness A (2008) USACE dam safety program-transition to risk management. The sustainability of experience-investing in the human factor. 28th Annual USSD Conference, Portland, April 28-May 2, pp 251–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder LF, Boulanger RW (1997) Application of Kα and Kα correction factors. In: Youd TL, Idriss IM (eds) Proceedings of the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Technical Report NCEER-97-0022, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, SUNY, pp 167–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2004) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. In: Doolin D (ed) Proceeding 11th international conference on soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, and 3rd international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering. Stallion, Vol 1, pp 32–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2007) SPT-and CPT-based relationships for the residual shear strength of liquefied soils. In: Pitilakis KD (ed) Earthquake geotechnical engineering, 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering-invited lectures. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph MNO-12. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, pp 261

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (1996) Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics. Oxford University Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamai R, Boulanger RW (2012). Single-element simulations of partial-drainage effects under monotonic and cyclic loading. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 35:29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravifar A, Boulanger RW, Kunnath SK (2013) Effects of liquefaction on inelastic demands on extended pile shafts. Earthq Spectra EERI, on-line ahead of print

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T (1999) Water film in liquefied sand and its effect on lateral spread. J Geotech Eng ASCE 125(10):817–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T (2003) Current state of research on flow failure considering void redistribution in liquefied deposits. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23(7):585–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulasingam R, Malvick EJ, Boulanger RW, Kutter BL (2004) Strength loss and localization at silt interlayers in slopes of liquefied sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 130(11):1192–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malvick EJ, Kutter BL, Boulanger RW (2008) Postshaking shear strain localization in a centrifuge model of a saturated sand slope. J Geotech Geoenviron Engi ASCE 134(2):164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery J, Boulanger RW, Harder LF Jr (2012) Examination of the Kα overburden correction factor on liquefaction resistance. Report No. UCD/CGM-12-02, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, p 44

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger DF, Bowles DS, Boyer DD, Davis DW, Margo DA, Moser DA, Regan PJ, Snorteland N (2009) Interim tolerable risk guidelines for US Army corps of engineers dams. Managing our water retention systems. 29th Annual USSD conference, Nashville, April 20–24, pp 1125–1141

    Google Scholar 

  • Naesgaard E, Byrne PM (2007) Flow liquefaction simulation using a combined effective stress-total stress model. Proceedings Ottawa 2007, Canadian Geotechnical Society, paper 577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naesgaard E, Byrne PM, Seid-Karbasi M, Park SS (2005) Modeling flow liquefaction, its mitigation, and comparison with centrifuge tests. Proceedings, performance based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering: concepts and research, geotechnical earthquake engineering satellite conference, Osaka, September 10, pp 95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson SM, Stark TD (2002) Liquefied strength ratio from liquefaction flow case histories. Can Geotech J 39:629–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlea VG, Beaty MH (2010) Corps of Engineers practice in the evaluation of seismic deformation of embankment dams. Fifth international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, San Diego, paper SPL–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthford M, Perlea V, Serafini D, Beaty M, Anderson L, Bowles D. (2011) Risk assessment of Success Dam, California: earthquake induced potential failure modes. Geo-Risk 2011 ASCE, pp 923–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB (1983) Earthquake resistant design of earth dams. Proceeding symposium on seismic design of embankments and caverns, ASCE, pp 41–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB (1987) Design problems in soil liquefaction. J Geotech Eng ASCE 113(8):827–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Lee KL, Idriss IM, Makdisi F (1975) The slides in the San Fernando dams during the earthquake of February 9, 1971. J Geotech Eng ASCE 101(7):651–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF Jr, Chung R (1984) The influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. Earthquake Eng. Research Center Rep. No. UCB/EERC-84/15. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Seid-Karbasi M, Byrne PM (2007) Seismic liquefaction, lateral spreading, and flow slides: a numerical investigation into void redistribution. Can Geotech J 44(7):873–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serafini DC, Rose RS (2010) Overview of the Isabella dam potential failure modes workshop. Collaborative management of integrated watersheds. 30th Annual USSD conference, Sacramento. April 12–16, pp 1341–1353

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver ML, Chan CK, Ladd RS, Lee KL, Tiedemann DA, Townsend FC, Valera JE, Wilson JH (1976) Cyclic triaxial strength of standard test sand. J ASCE 102 GT 5:511–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Snorteland N, Dinneen E (2008) Using risk to make decisions, prioritize resources, and measure performance for water resources facilities at the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. The sustainability of experience-investing in the human factor. 28th Annual USSD Conference, Portland, April 28-May 2, pp 229–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Toki S, Tatsuoka F, Miura S, Yoshimi Y, Yasuda S, Makihara Y (1986) Cyclic undrained triaxial strength of sand by a cooperative test program. Soils Found 26:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USCOLD (1992) Observed performance of dams during earthquakes. US Committee on Large Dams, Denver, July, p 129

    Google Scholar 

  • USCOLD (2000) Observed performance of dams during earthquakes. US Committee on Large Dams, Vol II. Denver, October, p 162

    Google Scholar 

  • USACE (2011) Safety of dams-policy and procedures. ER 110-2-1156, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, October 28, p 430

    Google Scholar 

  • USBR (2011) Dam safety risk analysis best practices training manual, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, in cooperation with the US Army Corps of Engineers, Denver, Version 2.2, April

    Google Scholar 

  • USSD (2013) Observed performance of dams during earthquakes, Volume III. US Society on Dams, Denver, p 130 (in-press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaid YP, Finn WDL (1979) Static shear and liquefaction potential. J Geotech Div ASCE 105(GT10):1233–1246

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaid YP, Chern JC (1985) Cyclic and monotonic undrained response of saturated sands. Advances in the art of testing soils under cyclic conditions, ASCE, pp 120–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo R, Sitar N, Frost DJ, Bray JD, Candia G, Eldridge T, Hashash Y, Olson SM, Urzua A (2012) Seismic performance of earth structures during the February 2010 Maule, Chile, earthquake: dams, levees, tailings dams, and retaining walls. Earthq Spectra EERI 28(S1):S75–S96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZL, Makdisi FI (1999) Implementing a bounding surface hypoplasticity model for sand into the FLAC program. FLAC and numerical modeling in geomechanics. A.A. Balkema, Netherlands, pp 483–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZL, Dafalias YF, Shen CK (1990) Bounding surface hypoplasticity model for sand. J Eng Mech ASCE 116(5):983–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z-L, Makdisi FI, Ma F (2012) Effective stress soil model calibration based on in situ measured soil properties. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 138(7):869–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Elgamal AW (2002) Influence of permeability on liquefaction-induced shear deformation. J Eng Mech 128(7):720–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Elgamal A, Parra E (2003) Computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 129(12):1119–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimi Y, Tokimatsu K, Kaneko O, Makihara Y (1984) Undrained cyclic shear strength of dense Niigata sand. Soils Found, Jpn Soc Soil Mech Found Eng 24(4):131–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL et al (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(10):817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziotopoulou K, Boulanger RW (2012) Constitutive modeling of duration and overburden effects in liquefaction evaluations. Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, May 28–30, Taormina

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziotopoulou K, Boulanger RW (2013a) Calibration and implementation of a sand plasticity plane-strain model for earthquake engineering applications. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 53:268–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziotopoulou K, Boulanger RW (2013b) Numerical modeling issues in predicting post-liquefaction reconsolidation strains and settlements. Proceeding 10CUEE, March 1–2, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Portions of the work presented herein were prepared in cooperation with the California Department of Water Resources for research funded under contract 4600009523. The authors appreciate the comments of Drs. Richard Armstrong, Mike Beaty, and Erik Malvick. The simulations for evaluating Kα behaviors for a number of constitutive models were performed by Monika Maharjan. The authors greatly appreciate all of the above support and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Davis, California, USA

    Ross W. Boulanger, Jack Montgomery & Katerina Ziotopoulou

Authors
  1. Ross W. Boulanger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jack Montgomery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katerina Ziotopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross W. Boulanger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, Özyeǧin University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Atilla Ansal

  2. Faculty of Engineering Geotechnical Eng. Research Group, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

    Mohamed Sakr

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boulanger, R., Montgomery, J., Ziotopoulou, K. (2015). Nonlinear Deformation Analyses of Liquefaction Effects on Embankment Dams. In: Ansal, A., Sakr, M. (eds) Perspectives on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 37. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10786-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation