Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to contribute to the ongoing discussion on academics’ community engagement by focusing on the nature, extent and the evaluation of academics’ community engagement in three European countries – Croatia, Germany and Ireland – and their different social, cultural, political and economic contexts. Differences in contexts can be reflected in differences in the involvement of the university with wider community. A qualitative inquiry was deemed appropriate for the research which was designed to examine the (I) the nature and extent of academics’/participants’ public engagement in the community/society with non-economic stakeholders (other than business and industry) and (II) the status of their community engagement in the frame of institutional commitment to value that kind of activities and academics’ public engagement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Lisbon strategy (2000), EU Communication A new partnership for the modernisation of universities: the EU Forum for University Business Dialogue (2009), EU Communication Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: education, research and innovation (2006), EU Communication Mobilizing the brainpower of Europe: enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy (2005), EU Communication The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge (2003) OECD reports like Higher Education and Regions: Globally competitive, locally engaged (2007) and Public-private partnerships for research and innovation: an evaluation of the Dutch experience (2004) are only some of the examples.
- 2.
Authors find this notion of community engagement only as one aspect of the entire complex relationship of the university with the community.
- 3.
The order of operations/categories is not random, but it should be noted that it is not related to the quantification of the respondents’ answers or their perception of the importance of certain activities, given that the research questions were not directed towards such analysis. This section first highlights the activities that are associated with the integration of engagement activities into regular academic activities (teaching and research), and then those activities that take place outside the traditional academic framework. This way we tried to further underline the importance of interconnection of academics’ community engagement activities with teaching and research, the very perspective that we support. In fact, a growing body of research systematically suggests the benefits which the integration of academic service-learning model brings to the academic growth and development of students, the development of their social skills, as well as their personal and moral development. The results of the research emphasize the positive changes in students’ critical thinking, their analytical skills, comprehension, and greater commitment to academic work, the perception of greater usefulness of the contents they learn, greater satisfaction with their course and study, and a greater likelihood of staying in the formal education system (Astin et al. 2000; Eyler 2000; Root et al. 2003). Students who participate in such designed community activities, show a positive change in their field of communication skills, are more willing to work with diverse groups of people, show greater confidence in their ability to promptly detect problems in the community, to organize and take the necessary steps for the development of problem solving approaches and stronger civil engagement and dedication to the community (Myers-Lipton 1996; Osborne et al. 1998; Eyler and Giles 1999; Kezar and Rhoads 2001). Engagement in such activities allows students to develop leadership skills, a better understanding of racial and cultural issues, and it strengthens their sense of social responsibility (Howard-Hamilton 2000).
- 4.
Of all the listed activities and events, only few respondents from Croatia pointed out their personal participation at the Science Festival. In other events of this type and featured here, academics, i.e. respondents from Germany engage dominantly.
References
Abes, E. S., Jackson, G., & Jones, S. R. (2002). Factors that motivate and deter faculty use of service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9, 5–17.
Arbo, P., & Benneworth, P. S. (2006). Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: A literature review. IMHE ‘The Regional Contribution of Higher Education’ project report. Paris: OECD.
Association of Commonwealth Universities (ACU). (2001). Engagement as a core value for the university: A consultation document (online version). London: Association of Commonwealth Universities. http://www.acu.ac.uk/. Accessed 11 May 2010.
Astin, H. S., Antonio, A. L., & Cress, C. M. (2000). Community service in higher education: A look at the nation’s faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 373–397.
Benneworth, P. S., & Hospers, G. (2007). Urban competitiveness in the knowledge economy: Universities as new planning animateurs. Progress in Planning, 67, 105–197.
Benson, L., Harkavy, I., & Puckett, J. (2000). An implementation revolution as a strategy for fulfilling the democratic promise of university-community partnerships: Penn-west Philadelphia as an experiment in progress. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 24–45.
Bloomgarden, A. H., & O’Meara, K. A. (2007). Faculty role integration and community engagement: Harmony or cacophony? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 13(2), 5–18.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsider: Priorities of the professoriate. Stanford: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1(1), 11–20.
Brennan, J. (2006). The changing academic profession: The driving forces. In RIHE (Ed.), Reports of changing academic profession project workshop on quality, relevance and governance in the changing academia: International perspectives (COE publication series, Vol. 20, pp. 37–44). Hiroshima: Hiroshima University.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–240.
Butcher, J., Howard, P., Labone, E., & Bailey, M. (2003). Teacher education, community service learning, and student efficacy for CE. Asia Pacific Journal for Teacher Education, 31(2), 110–124.
Cooper, C. (2005). Accounting for the public interest: Public ineffectuals or public intellectuals. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(5), 592–607.
Correa Bernardo, M. A., Butcher, J., & Howard, P. (2012). An international comparison of community engagement in higher education. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(2012), 187–192.
Ćulum, B., & Ledić, J. (2010). Civilna misija sveučilišta – element u tragovima? Rijeka: Filozofski fakultet u Rijeci.
Ćulum, B., & Ledić, J. (2012). Sveučilišni nastavnici i civilna misija sveučilišta. Rijeka: Filozofski fakultet u Rijeci.
Ćulum, B., Rončević, N., & Ledić, J. (2013). The academic profession and the role of the service function. In U. Teichler & E. A. Höhle (Eds.), The work situation of the academic professions: Findings of a survey in twelve European countries (pp. 137–158). Dordrecht: Springer.
European Commission (EC). (2003). The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge. Communication from the Commission. Brussels, 5 Feb 2003. COM (2003), 58 final.
European Commission (EC). (2005). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Mobilizing the brainpower of Europe: Enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy. [COM (2005), 152 of 20 April 2005 and Council Resolution of 15 November 2005].
European Commission (EC). (2006). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation. [COM (2006), 208 final].
European Commission (EC). (2009). Communication form the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A new partnership for the modernisation of universities: The EU Forum for University Business Dialogue. [COM (2009), 158 final].
Eyler, J. S. (2000). What do we most need to know about the impact of service learning on student learning? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7, 11–17.
Eyler, J. S., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service learning? San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publisher.
Goddard, J. B., & Chatterton, P. (2003). The response of universities to regional needs’. In F. Boekema, E. Kuypers, & R. Rutten (Eds.), Economic geography of higher education: Knowledge, infrastructure and learning regions. London: Routledge.
Göransson, B., Maharajh, R., & Schmoch, U. (2009). New activities of universities in transfer and extension: Multiple requirements and manifold solutions. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 157–164.
Hall, P. (2010). Community engagement in South African higher education. Kogisano, 6, 3–53.
Harwood, A. M., Ochs, L., Currier, D., Duke, S., Hammond, J., Moulds, L., Stout, K., & Werder, C. (2005). Communities for growth: Cultivating and sustaining service-learning teaching and scholarship in a faculty fellows program. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 12(1), 41–51.
Howard-Hamilton, M. F. (2000). Creating a culturally responsive learning environment for African American students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 82, 45–53.
Hudson, P. B., Craig, R. F., & Hudson, S. M. (2007). Benchmarking leadership in university-community engagement: First steps and future directions for a new regional university campus. In Proceedings Australian Universities Community Engagement Alliance (AUCEA), Alice Springs, Northern Territory.
Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.
Kezar, A., & Rhoads, R. A. (2001). The dynamic tension of service learning in higher education – A philosophical perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 148–171.
Krücken, G., Meier, F., & Müller, A. (2009). Linkages to the society as “leisure time activities”? Experiences at German universities. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 139–144.
Ledić, J. (2007). U potrazi za civilnom misijom hrvatskih sveučilišta. In V. Previšić, N. N. Šoljan, & N. Hrvatić (Eds.), Pedagogija – prema cjeloživotnom obrazovanju i društvu znanja (Vol. 1, pp. 123–134). Zagreb: Hrvatsko pedagogijsko društvo.
Linton, C. J. (1995). An indirect model of service-learning: Integrating research, teaching and community service. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2, 105–111.
Macfarlane, B. (2007). The academic citizen: The virtue of service in university life. London/New York: Routledge.
McKay, V. C., & Rozee, P. D. (2004). Characteristics of faculty who adopt community service-learning pedagogy. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 10(2), 21–33.
Myers-Lipton, S. (1996). Effect of service – Learning on college students’ attitudes toward international understanding. Journal of College Student Development, 37(6), 659–668.
O’Meara, K. A. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 57–80.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD. (2007). Higher education and regions: Globally competitive, locally engaged. Paris: OECD – Institutional Management in Higher Education Programme.
Osborne, R. E., Hammerich, S., & Hensley, C. (1998). Student effects of service-learning: Tracking change across a semester. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5, 5–13.
Persell, C., & Wenglinsky, H. (2004). For – Profit post-secondary education and civic engagement. Higher Education 47(3), 337–359. Springer stable. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4151548. Accessed 9 Oct 2012.
Peters, S. J. (2000). The formative politics of outreach scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 6(1), 23–30.
Reardon, K. M. (1998). Participatory action research as service learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 73, 57–64.
Root, S., Eyler, J., & Giles, D. (2003). The Bonner scholars program: A study of the impact of stipends on indicators of a community service ethic. Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum, 14(3), 97–110.
Russell Group of Universities. (2004). Higher education community engagement model: Final report and analysis. London: The Corporate Citizenship Company.
Schleicher, A. (2006). Europe’s University challenge, OECD Observer, 2006(1), No. 254, 7–8
Shin, J. C. (2010). Scholarship of service: Faculty perceptions, workloads and reward systems. RIHE International Seminar Reports, 15, 173–188.
Singh, M., & Little, B. (2011). Learning and engagement dimensions of higher education in knowledge society discourses. In J. Brennan & T. Shah (Eds.), Higher education and society in changing times: Looking back and looking forward (pp. 36–44). London: The Center for Higher Education Research and Information (CHERI).
Stanton, T. K. (1994). The experience of faculty participants in an instructional development seminar on service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1(1), 7–20.
Stoecker, R. (2003). Community-based research: From practice to theory and back again. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(Spring), 35–46.
Strand, J. K. (2000). Community-based research as pedagogy. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7(Fall), 85–96.
Strand, J. K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, N., & Donohue, P. (2003). Principles of best practice for community-based research. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(Fall), 5–15.
Vickers, M., Harris, C., & Mc Carthy, F. (2004). University community engagement exploring service learning options within practicum. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 129–139.
Ward, K. (1996). Service-learning and student volunteerism: Reflections on institutional commitment. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 3, 55–65.
Winter, A., Wiseman, J., & Muirhead, B. (2008). University-community engagement in Australia: Practice, policy and public good. Education Citizenship and Social Justice, 1, 211–230.
Wynsberghe, R. V., & Andruske, C. L. (2007). Research in the service of co-learning: Sustainability and community engagement. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(1), 349–376.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ćulum, B., Turk, M., Ledić, J. (2015). Academics and Community Engagement: Comparative Perspective from Three European Countries. In: Fumasoli, T., Goastellec, G., Kehm, B. (eds) Academic Work and Careers in Europe: Trends, Challenges, Perspectives. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10720-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10720-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10719-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10720-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)