Skip to main content

Academics and Community Engagement: Comparative Perspective from Three European Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to contribute to the ongoing discussion on academics’ community engagement by focusing on the nature, extent and the evaluation of academics’ community engagement in three European countries – Croatia, Germany and Ireland – and their different social, cultural, political and economic contexts. Differences in contexts can be reflected in differences in the involvement of the university with wider community. A qualitative inquiry was deemed appropriate for the research which was designed to examine the (I) the nature and extent of academics’/participants’ public engagement in the community/society with non-economic stakeholders (other than business and industry) and (II) the status of their community engagement in the frame of institutional commitment to value that kind of activities and academics’ public engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lisbon strategy (2000), EU Communication A new partnership for the modernisation of universities: the EU Forum for University Business Dialogue (2009), EU Communication Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: education, research and innovation (2006), EU Communication Mobilizing the brainpower of Europe: enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy (2005), EU Communication The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge (2003) OECD reports like Higher Education and Regions: Globally competitive, locally engaged (2007) and Public-private partnerships for research and innovation: an evaluation of the Dutch experience (2004) are only some of the examples.

  2. 2.

    Authors find this notion of community engagement only as one aspect of the entire complex relationship of the university with the community.

  3. 3.

    The order of operations/categories is not random, but it should be noted that it is not related to the quantification of the respondents’ answers or their perception of the importance of certain activities, given that the research questions were not directed towards such analysis. This section first highlights the activities that are associated with the integration of engagement activities into regular academic activities (teaching and research), and then those activities that take place outside the traditional academic framework. This way we tried to further underline the importance of interconnection of academics’ community engagement activities with teaching and research, the very perspective that we support. In fact, a growing body of research systematically suggests the benefits which the integration of academic service-learning model brings to the academic growth and development of students, the development of their social skills, as well as their personal and moral development. The results of the research emphasize the positive changes in students’ critical thinking, their analytical skills, comprehension, and greater commitment to academic work, the perception of greater usefulness of the contents they learn, greater satisfaction with their course and study, and a greater likelihood of staying in the formal education system (Astin et al. 2000; Eyler 2000; Root et al. 2003). Students who participate in such designed community activities, show a positive change in their field of communication skills, are more willing to work with diverse groups of people, show greater confidence in their ability to promptly detect problems in the community, to organize and take the necessary steps for the development of problem solving approaches and stronger civil engagement and dedication to the community (Myers-Lipton 1996; Osborne et al. 1998; Eyler and Giles 1999; Kezar and Rhoads 2001). Engagement in such activities allows students to develop leadership skills, a better understanding of racial and cultural issues, and it strengthens their sense of social responsibility (Howard-Hamilton 2000).

  4. 4.

    Of all the listed activities and events, only few respondents from Croatia pointed out their personal participation at the Science Festival. In other events of this type and featured here, academics, i.e. respondents from Germany engage dominantly.

References

  • Abes, E. S., Jackson, G., & Jones, S. R. (2002). Factors that motivate and deter faculty use of service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbo, P., & Benneworth, P. S. (2006). Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: A literature review. IMHE ‘The Regional Contribution of Higher Education’ project report. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Commonwealth Universities (ACU). (2001). Engagement as a core value for the university: A consultation document (online version). London: Association of Commonwealth Universities. http://www.acu.ac.uk/. Accessed 11 May 2010.

  • Astin, H. S., Antonio, A. L., & Cress, C. M. (2000). Community service in higher education: A look at the nation’s faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benneworth, P. S., & Hospers, G. (2007). Urban competitiveness in the knowledge economy: Universities as new planning animateurs. Progress in Planning, 67, 105–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, L., Harkavy, I., & Puckett, J. (2000). An implementation revolution as a strategy for fulfilling the democratic promise of university-community partnerships: Penn-west Philadelphia as an experiment in progress. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 24–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomgarden, A. H., & O’Meara, K. A. (2007). Faculty role integration and community engagement: Harmony or cacophony? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 13(2), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsider: Priorities of the professoriate. Stanford: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1(1), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. (2006). The changing academic profession: The driving forces. In RIHE (Ed.), Reports of changing academic profession project workshop on quality, relevance and governance in the changing academia: International perspectives (COE publication series, Vol. 20, pp. 37–44). Hiroshima: Hiroshima University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J., Howard, P., Labone, E., & Bailey, M. (2003). Teacher education, community service learning, and student efficacy for CE. Asia Pacific Journal for Teacher Education, 31(2), 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. (2005). Accounting for the public interest: Public ineffectuals or public intellectuals. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(5), 592–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correa Bernardo, M. A., Butcher, J., & Howard, P. (2012). An international comparison of community engagement in higher education. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(2012), 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ćulum, B., & Ledić, J. (2010). Civilna misija sveučilišta – element u tragovima? Rijeka: Filozofski fakultet u Rijeci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćulum, B., & Ledić, J. (2012). Sveučilišni nastavnici i civilna misija sveučilišta. Rijeka: Filozofski fakultet u Rijeci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćulum, B., Rončević, N., & Ledić, J. (2013). The academic profession and the role of the service function. In U. Teichler & E. A. Höhle (Eds.), The work situation of the academic professions: Findings of a survey in twelve European countries (pp. 137–158). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC). (2003). The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge. Communication from the Commission. Brussels, 5 Feb 2003. COM (2003), 58 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC). (2005). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Mobilizing the brainpower of Europe: Enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon Strategy. [COM (2005), 152 of 20 April 2005 and Council Resolution of 15 November 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC). (2006). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation. [COM (2006), 208 final].

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC). (2009). Communication form the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A new partnership for the modernisation of universities: The EU Forum for University Business Dialogue. [COM (2009), 158 final].

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyler, J. S. (2000). What do we most need to know about the impact of service learning on student learning? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyler, J. S., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service learning? San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J. B., & Chatterton, P. (2003). The response of universities to regional needs’. In F. Boekema, E. Kuypers, & R. Rutten (Eds.), Economic geography of higher education: Knowledge, infrastructure and learning regions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göransson, B., Maharajh, R., & Schmoch, U. (2009). New activities of universities in transfer and extension: Multiple requirements and manifold solutions. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (2010). Community engagement in South African higher education. Kogisano, 6, 3–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, A. M., Ochs, L., Currier, D., Duke, S., Hammond, J., Moulds, L., Stout, K., & Werder, C. (2005). Communities for growth: Cultivating and sustaining service-learning teaching and scholarship in a faculty fellows program. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 12(1), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Hamilton, M. F. (2000). Creating a culturally responsive learning environment for African American students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 82, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, P. B., Craig, R. F., & Hudson, S. M. (2007). Benchmarking leadership in university-community engagement: First steps and future directions for a new regional university campus. In Proceedings Australian Universities Community Engagement Alliance (AUCEA), Alice Springs, Northern Territory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., & Rhoads, R. A. (2001). The dynamic tension of service learning in higher education – A philosophical perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 148–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, G., Meier, F., & Müller, A. (2009). Linkages to the society as “leisure time activities”? Experiences at German universities. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledić, J. (2007). U potrazi za civilnom misijom hrvatskih sveučilišta. In V. Previšić, N. N. Šoljan, & N. Hrvatić (Eds.), Pedagogija – prema cjeloživotnom obrazovanju i društvu znanja (Vol. 1, pp. 123–134). Zagreb: Hrvatsko pedagogijsko društvo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, C. J. (1995). An indirect model of service-learning: Integrating research, teaching and community service. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2, 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B. (2007). The academic citizen: The virtue of service in university life. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, V. C., & Rozee, P. D. (2004). Characteristics of faculty who adopt community service-learning pedagogy. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 10(2), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers-Lipton, S. (1996). Effect of service – Learning on college students’ attitudes toward international understanding. Journal of College Student Development, 37(6), 659–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, K. A. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD. (2007). Higher education and regions: Globally competitive, locally engaged. Paris: OECD – Institutional Management in Higher Education Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. E., Hammerich, S., & Hensley, C. (1998). Student effects of service-learning: Tracking change across a semester. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persell, C., & Wenglinsky, H. (2004). For – Profit post-secondary education and civic engagement. Higher Education 47(3), 337–359. Springer stable. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4151548. Accessed 9 Oct 2012.

  • Peters, S. J. (2000). The formative politics of outreach scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 6(1), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, K. M. (1998). Participatory action research as service learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 73, 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root, S., Eyler, J., & Giles, D. (2003). The Bonner scholars program: A study of the impact of stipends on indicators of a community service ethic. Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum, 14(3), 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell Group of Universities. (2004). Higher education community engagement model: Final report and analysis. London: The Corporate Citizenship Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, A. (2006). Europe’s University challenge, OECD Observer, 2006(1), No. 254, 7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C. (2010). Scholarship of service: Faculty perceptions, workloads and reward systems. RIHE International Seminar Reports, 15, 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M., & Little, B. (2011). Learning and engagement dimensions of higher education in knowledge society discourses. In J. Brennan & T. Shah (Eds.), Higher education and society in changing times: Looking back and looking forward (pp. 3644). London: The Center for Higher Education Research and Information (CHERI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, T. K. (1994). The experience of faculty participants in an instructional development seminar on service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1(1), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, R. (2003). Community-based research: From practice to theory and back again. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(Spring), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, J. K. (2000). Community-based research as pedagogy. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7(Fall), 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, J. K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, N., & Donohue, P. (2003). Principles of best practice for community-based research. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(Fall), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, M., Harris, C., & Mc Carthy, F. (2004). University community engagement exploring service learning options within practicum. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. (1996). Service-learning and student volunteerism: Reflections on institutional commitment. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 3, 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, A., Wiseman, J., & Muirhead, B. (2008). University-community engagement in Australia: Practice, policy and public good. Education Citizenship and Social Justice, 1, 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynsberghe, R. V., & Andruske, C. L. (2007). Research in the service of co-learning: Sustainability and community engagement. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(1), 349–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bojana Ćulum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ćulum, B., Turk, M., Ledić, J. (2015). Academics and Community Engagement: Comparative Perspective from Three European Countries. In: Fumasoli, T., Goastellec, G., Kehm, B. (eds) Academic Work and Careers in Europe: Trends, Challenges, Perspectives. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10720-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics