Skip to main content

Integral Theory: An Expanded and Holistic Framework for Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrative Approaches to Sustainable Development at University Level

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

The meme of sustainability continues to gain traction in almost every corner of the planet, and yet, there is still wide spread resistance against the basic premise. While the Triple Bottom Line has proved useful and has aided in the movement forward, deeper and more holistic frameworks are required to engage wider and more diverse audiences. For those working in fields dominated by subjective thinking and qualitative analysis, such as design, sustainability presents a cold, neutral and unbending proposition. This paper will examine the promise of Integral Theory as a framework for sustainability that unites the subjective and objective aspects of human existence. Furthermore, Mark DeKay’s Integral Sustainable Design and Barrett’s Whole System Change Methodologies, which both use Integral Theory as their foundation, will also be discussed. Finally, the proposed Quadruple Bottom Line will be introduced as a new and superior framework to what is used in practice today. In this way, the likelihood of the adoption of sustainability as THE core meta-value for humanity will be increased, thus spurring deeper levels of environmental regeneration, social equity, economic viability, and cultural significance. Examples of how this leap forward has transformed curriculum development and campus operations will be shared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anthony K (1991) Design Juries on trial: the renaissance of the design studio. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York p 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown B (2005) Theory and practice of integral sustainable development: Part 2–Values, developmental levels, and natural design. AQAL 1(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown L (2009) Plan B 4.0, Mobilizing to save civilization, 1st edn. W.W

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Poulter J (2006) Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology, and its use practitioners, teachers and students. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKay M (2011) Integral sustainable design: transformative perspectives. Earthscan, London p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Esbjörn-Hargens S (2009) An overview of integral theory: an all-inclusive framework for the 21st Century. Integral Research Centre. http://www.integralresearchcenter.org/sites/default/files/integraltheory_3-2-2009.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2012

  • Fleming R (2013) Design education for a sustainable future. Routledge/Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosey L (2012) The shape of green: aesthetics, ecology and design. Island Press, Washington p7

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin J (2009) The empathic civilization: the race to global consciousness in a world in crisis. Penguin, New York, pp 34

    Google Scholar 

  • Salama A, El-Attar ME (2010) Student perceptions of the architectural design jury. Special volume: Design education: explorations and prospects for a better built environment. Archnet-Int J Architect Res 4(2–3):175

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer R (ed) (2008) The encyclopedia of race, ethnicity, and society. SAGE publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl B (2007) Ethics, Morality and Critique: An Essay on Enid Mumford’s Socio-Technical Approach. J Assoc Inf Syst 8 (9) Article 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser F (2003) Ken Wilber: thought as passion. State University of New York, Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker S (2006) Sustainable by design: explorations in theory and practice. Earthscan, London p 27

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber K (2000) A theory of everything: an integral vision for business, politics, science and spirituality. Shambhala, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. World commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York 400 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz J (2010) The new world of the anthropocene. Environ Sci Technol 44(7):2228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. Fleming .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fleming, R.M. (2015). Integral Theory: An Expanded and Holistic Framework for Sustainability. In: Leal Filho, W., Brandli, L., Kuznetsova, O., Paço, A. (eds) Integrative Approaches to Sustainable Development at University Level. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10690-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics