Weak Singular Hybrid Automata

  • Shankara Narayanan Krishna
  • Umang Mathur
  • Ashutosh Trivedi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8711)


The framework of Hybrid automata—introduced by Alur, Courcourbetis, Henzinger, and Ho—provides a formal modeling and analysis environment to analyze the interaction between the discrete and the continuous parts of hybrid systems. Hybrid automata can be considered as generalizations of finite state automata augmented with a finite set of real-valued variables whose dynamics in each state is governed by a system of ordinary differential equations. Moreover, the discrete transitions of hybrid automata are guarded by constraints over the values of these real-valued variables, and enable discontinuous jumps in the evolution of these variables. Singular hybrid automata are a subclass of hybrid automata where dynamics is specified by state-dependent constant vectors. Henzinger, Kopke, Puri, and Varaiya showed that for even very restricted subclasses of singular hybrid automata, the fundamental verification questions, like reachability and schedulability, are undecidable. Recently, Alur, Wojtczak, and Trivedi studied an interesting class of hybrid systems, called constant-rate multi-mode systems, where schedulability and reachability analysis can be performed in polynomial time. Inspired by the definition of constant-rate multi-mode systems, in this paper we introduce weak singular hybrid automata (WSHA), a previously unexplored subclass of singular hybrid automata, and show the decidability (and the exact complexity) of various verification questions for this class including reachability (NP-Complete) and LTL model-checking (Pspace-Complete). We further show that extending WSHA with a single unrestricted clock or with unrestricted variable updates lead to undecidability of reachability problem.


Model Check Hybrid Automaton Reachability Problem Counter Machine Initial Valuation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alur, R., Courcoubetis, C., Henzinger, T.A., Ho, P.-S.: Hybrid automata: An algorithmic approach to the specification and verification of hybrid systems. In: Hybrid Systems, pp. 209–229 (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alur, R., Dill, D.: A theory of timed automata. TCS 126(2), 183–235 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alur, R., Forejt, V., Moarref, S., Trivedi, A.: Safe schedulability of bounded-rate multi-mode systems. In: HSCC, pp. 243–252 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A.: A really temporal logic. J. ACM 41(1), 181–203 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alur, R., Trivedi, A., Wojtczak, D.: Optimal scheduling for constant-rate multi-mode systems. In: HSCC, pp. 75–84 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Asarin, E., Maler, O.: Achilles and the tortoise climbing up the arithmetical hierarchy. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 57(3), 389–398 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Asarin, E., Maler, O., Pnueli, A.: Reachability analysis of dynamical systems having piecewise-constant derivatives. TCS 138, 35–66 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baier, C., Katoen, J.P.: Principles of model checking. MIT Press (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Čerāns, K.: Algorithmic problems in analysis of real time system specifications. PhD thesis (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fearnley, J., Jurdziński, M.: Reachability in two-clock timed automata is PSPACE-complete. In: Fomin, F.V., Freivalds, R., Kwiatkowska, M., Peleg, D. (eds.) ICALP 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7966, pp. 212–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henzinger, T.A., Kopke, P.W.: Discrete-time control for rectangular hybrid automata. TCS 221(1-2), 369–392 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henzinger, T.A., Kopke, P.W., Puri, A., Varaiya, P.: What’s decidable about hybrid automata? Journal of Comp. and Sys. Sciences 57, 94–124 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones, N.D., Lien, Y.E., Laaser, W.T.: New problems complete for nondeterministic log space. Mathematical Systems Theory 10(1), 1–17 (1976)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krishna, S.N., Mathur, U., Trivedi, A.: Weak singular hybrid automata (2014),
  15. 15.
    Laroussinie, F., Markey, N., Schnoebelen, P.: Model checking timed automata with one or two clocks. In: Gardner, P., Yoshida, N. (eds.) CONCUR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3170, pp. 387–401. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Markey, N.: Verification of Embedded Systems – Algorithms and Complexity. Mémoire d’habilitation, ENS Cachan, France (April 2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Minsky, M.L.: Computation: finite and infinite machines. Prentice-Hall (1967)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perrin, D., Pin, J.E.: Infinite Words—Automata, Semigroups, Logic and Games. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 141. Elsevier (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sistla, A.P., Clarke, E.M.: The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics. J. ACM 32(3), 733–749 (1985)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shankara Narayanan Krishna
    • 1
  • Umang Mathur
    • 1
  • Ashutosh Trivedi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology - BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations