Skip to main content

The Rules on Prescription

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Perspectives on the Common European Sales Law

Part of the book series: Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation ((SEELR,volume 4))

  • 1112 Accesses

Abstract

The Common European Sales Law, although limited in its application to the sale of goods, contains a systematic and almost complete regulation of the prescription of actions that takes into account several new tendencies that have emerged from a number of national legal systems. Broadly speaking, it contains two expiry periods that vary depending on the way in which the dies a quo are fixed. The shorter of the two expiry periods employs a subjective criterion, while the longer period makes use of an objective criterion, although this period is not a preclusion period. The law allows the parties concerned a great deal of autonomy in determining the length of these periods. It further distinguishes between the interruption and the suspension of the prescription period. In terms of the effects of the limitation period, the legislator has opted for the weak effect: that is, while it paralyses the action of the claimant, it does not extinguish the claimant’s right.

Prescription is undoubtedly a necessary doctrine; not only for obligations derived from contracts but for all types of obligations, and so its regulation in the Common European Sales Law could go on to form the basis of its regulation in a future European Civil Code.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albaladejo García M (1990) La prescripción de la acción reivindicatoria, Anuario de Derecho Civil, vol. 43, núm. 1, pp. 25 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo i Amayuelas E Vaquer A (2013) Prescription in the Proposal for a Common European Sales Law, European Review of Contract Law, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp. 38 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cañizares Laso A (2003) “La prescripción en el BGB después de la reforma del derecho de obligaciones”, in Estudios Jurídicos en Homenaje al Prof. Díez-Picazo, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pablo Contreras PV (1992), Prescripción de la acción reivindicatoria, Tecnos, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díez-Picazo y Ponce De León L (1964) La prescripción en el Código civil, Bosch, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díez-Picazo y Ponce De León L (1989) Las relaciones entre usucapión y prescripción extintiva de la acción reivindicatoria, in Homenaje al profesor Juan Roca Juan, Editum. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, pp. 221 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Goyena F (1852) Concordancias, motivos y comentarios del Código civil español, IV, Imprenta de la Sociedad Tipográfico-Editorial, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JE (2012) Thieves and Squatters: Acquisitive and Extinctive Prescription in European Property Law, EPLJ, pp. 153 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourdan S (2002) Adverse Possession, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montés Penadés V (1990) Comentario al art. 348 CC, in Comentarios al Código Civil y compilaciones forales, tomo V, vol. 1, Edersa, Madrid, pp. 205 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales Moreno AM (2003) Adaptación del Código Civil al Derecho Europeo: la compraventa, in El Dret Civil Català en el context europeu, Girona, pp. 142 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters F Zimmermann R (1981) Verjährungsfristen: Der Einfluss von Fristen auf Schuldverhältnisse; Möglichkeiten der Vereinfachung von Verjährungsfristen, in Gutachten und Vorschläge zur Überarbeitung des Schuldrechts, vol. I, Verlag Bundesanzeiger, Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomons A (2011) The Purpose and Coherence of the rules on Good Faith Acquisition and Acquisitive Prescription in the European Draft Common Frame of Reference. A tale of two gatekeepers, Centre for the Study of European Contract Law. Working Paper Series, vol. 11, Available online papers.ssrn.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yzquierdo Tolsada M (1998) Las tensiones entre usucapión y prescripción extintiva, Dykinson, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann R (2002), “Das neue deutsche Verjährungsrecht—ein Vorbild für Europa?”, in Huber P, Faust F (eds), Schuldrechtsmodernisierung: Einführung in das neue Recht, C. H. Beck 2002, pp. 15 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann R (2010) Comparative foundations of a European Law of Set-off and Prescription, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luz M. Martínez Velencoso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martínez Velencoso, L., O’Flynn, A. (2015). The Rules on Prescription. In: Plaza Penadés, J., Martínez Velencoso, L. (eds) European Perspectives on the Common European Sales Law. Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10497-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics