Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation ((SEELR,volume 4))

Abstract

The right to rescind the contract and to withhold or reduce the price does not fully compensate the creditor for his loss in every case. Therefore, each system of contract law must provide for an additional level of remedy as a backup. In most cases, this additional level of remedies consists in claims for damages and interests. Damages are the general remedy available for all kinds of breaches of contract. If monetary obligations are not performed, interest may be added as an additional remedy that does not exclude the simultaneous awarding of damages.

Damages and interest is regulated in ChapterĀ 16 of the CESL. One could consider ChapterĀ 16 as a sort of distilled experience of national and international law. Nevertheless, this does not prevent its articles from occasionally deviating from them. This chapter will first focus on general aspects of Chapter 16 (II) and then turn to the provisions on damages (III) and interest (IV).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees, OJ L 171, 7.7.1999, p.Ā 12.

  2. 2.

    Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions, OJ L 48, 23.2.2011, p.Ā 1.

  3. 3.

    Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions, OJ L 48, 23.2.2011, p.Ā 1, art. 1.

  4. 4.

    See Preamble 16 Directive 2011/7/EU.

  5. 5.

    See ECJ, decision of 12 March 2002, Case C-168/00, [2002] E.C.R. I-2631, at 20ā€“24.

  6. 6.

    Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package holidays and package tours, OJ L 158, 23.6.1990, p.Ā 59.

  7. 7.

    See ECJ, decision of 12 March 2002, Case C-168/00, [2002] E.C.R. I-2631, margin no. 22.

  8. 8.

    See e.g. ECJ, Case C-118/08, [2010] E.C.R. p.Ā I-635, Transportes Urbanos y Servicios Generales SAL, margin no. 33ā€†et seq.

  9. 9.

    See ECJ, Case C-52/00, [2002] E.C.R. p.Ā I-3827, Commission v France, at 19.

  10. 10.

    ECJ, Case C-52/00, [2002] E.C.R. p.Ā I-3827, Commission v France, at 17.

References

  • Aristotle (2013) Nichomachean Ethics book V (transl. W.D. Ross eBooks Adelaide).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Baird D G (1994). The Law and Economics of Contract Damages John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper 2d. series No.Ā 30.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Beale H (ed) (2012) Chitty on Contracts 31st ed. Sweet & Maxwell London.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • European Law Institute Statement on the Proposal for a Regulation on a Common European Sales Law COM (2011) 635 final 2012 available at http://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu (last visited 3 December 2013).

  • Expert Group on European contract A European contract law for consumers and businesses 3 May 2011 (so-called Feasibility Study) available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/contract/files/feasibility_study_final.pdf (last visited 3 December 2013).

  • Hegel G W F (2001) Elements of the Philosophy of Right (translation S.W. Dyde Batoche Books Kitchener Ontario).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Herbots J (2011) Why Is It Ill-Advised to Translate Consequential Damage by Dommage Indirect ERPL p.Ā 931 et seq.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Jauernig O (ed) (2011) BĆ¼rgerliches Gesetzbuch 14th ed. CH Beck Munich.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Keirse A (2011) Why the Proposed Optional Common European Sales Law Has Not But Should Have Abandoned the Principle of All or Nothing: A Guide to How to Sanction the Duty to Mitigate the Loss ERPL p.Ā 951 et sEq.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Koch B A (2011) Schadensersatz und RĆ¼ckabwicklung in: Wendehorst Christiane and Zƶchling-Jud Brigitta (eds.) Am Vorabend eines Gemeinsamen EuropƤischen Kaufrechts Manz Vienna p.Ā 225 et seq.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Magnus U (1987) Schaden und Ersatz Mohr Siebeck TĆ¼bingen.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Posner R (2007) Economic Analysis of Law 7th ed. Aspen Austin et al.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Remien O (2012) Schadensersatz und Zinsen nach EU-Kaufrecht in: Schmidt-Kessel Martin (ed) Ein einheitliches europƤisches Kaufrecht? sellier Munich p.Ā 503 et seq.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Remien O Herrler S and Limmer P eds (2012) Gemeinsames europƤisches Kaufrecht fĆ¼r die EU? Beck Munich pp.Ā 331 et seq.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schmidt-Kessel M (2012) Strukturfragen des Schadensersatzes im Draft Common Frame of Reference fĆ¼r ein EuropƤisches Privatrecht in: Remien Oliver (ed) Schadensersatz im europƤischen Privat- und Wirtschaftsrecht Mohr Siebeck TĆ¼bingen.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schulze R (ed) (2013) Common European Sales Law Hart Nomos Baden-Baden.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schwenzer (ed) (2010) Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods 3d. edition OUP Oxford.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Shavell S (2004) Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law Belknap Press of Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Treitel G H (1976) Contracts in General in: International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law vol.Ā 7 chapter 16 Mouton The Hague and Mohr Siebeck TĆ¼bingen.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Unberath H (2007) Die Vertragsverletzung Mohr Siebeck TĆ¼bingen.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts Official Commentary Rome 2010.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Vogenauer S & Kleinheisterkamp J eds (2009) Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC).

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Lehmann LLM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lehmann, M. (2015). Damages and Interest. In: Plaza PenadƩs, J., Martƭnez Velencoso, L. (eds) European Perspectives on the Common European Sales Law. Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10497-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics