Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Blind Image Deconvolution

Abstract

With the proliferation of digital cameras, amateur photography is in the rise and among the vast amount of digital images generated, many are blurred due to camera shake. This is an expected phenomenon since lightweight cameras are more prone to movement and unless a tripod is used the chances for blurring is high. Object motion and camera defocus can also lead to a blurred image. Similar scenarios arise in medical, biological and astronomical imaging. Hence the image of a point source appears as a disc, and overlap of such discs from neighbouring pixels leads to blurring. In addition, in systems such as the wide-field microscope the light scattered from out of focus planes causes blurring and the out-of-focus light depends on the object being imaged. If the nature of the blur is known it is possible to use deconvolution to estimate the sharp image. However, in most cases it is difficult or impossible to know the blur. In such cases the only solution to obtain a sharper image is by using blind deconvolution, wherein one tries to reconstruct the original image without any knowledge of the way the camera/subject moved. This chapter explains the image formation model, how image degradation occurs, and an introduction to blind deconvolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. L. Anat, W. Yair, D. Frédo, and T. F. William. Understanding and evaluating blind deconvolution algorithms. In CVPR. IEEE, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. C. Andrews and B. R. Hunt. Digital Image Restoration. Prentice Hall, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Bertero and P. Boccacci. Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging. IOP Publishing Ltd., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. F. Chan and C. K. Wong. Convergence of the alternating minimization algorithm for blind deconvolution. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 316:259–285, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. L. B. Charles. Alternating minimization and alternating projection algorithms: A tutorial. Technical report, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 2011. http://faculty.uml.edu/cbyrne/misc.htm.

  6. I. Csiszar and G. Tusnady. Information geometry and alternating minimization procedures. Statistics and Decisions Supp. 1, pages 205–237, 1984.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. H. W. Engl, M. Hanke, and A. Neubauer. Regularization of Inverse Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Fergus, B. Singh, A. Hertzmann, S. T. Roweis, and W.T. Freeman. Removing camera shake from a single photograph. ACM Transactions on Graphics, SIGGRAPH 2006 Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA, 25:787–794, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. A. T. Figueiredo, J. B. Dias, J. P. Oliveira, and R.D. Nowak. On total variation denoising: A new majorization-minimization algorithm and an experimental comparison with wavelet denoising. In ICIP, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. W. Goodman. Some fundamental properties of speckle. Journal of Optical Society of America, 66(11):1145–1150, Nov 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. K. Jain. Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Krishnan, T. Tay, and R. Fergus. Blind deconvolution using a normalized sparsity measure. In CVPR, pages 233–240. IEEE, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Kullback. Information theory and statistics. Dover, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. A. Morozov. Linear and nonlinear ill-posed problems. Matematicheskii Analiz, 11:129–178, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pentland A. P. A new sense for depth of field. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 9(4):532–531, July 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K.E. Patrizio Campisi and K. Egiazarian. Blind Image Deconvolution: Theory and Applications. CRC Press INC, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hunt B. R. Digital image processing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(4):693–710, April 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Smith. Modern Optical Engineering. McGraw-Hill Professional, 4 edition, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaudhuri, S., Velmurugan, R., Rameshan, R. (2014). Introduction. In: Blind Image Deconvolution. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10485-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10485-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10484-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10485-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics