Skip to main content

Does Duration Matter? A Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Global Innovation of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education

Part of the book series: Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education ((PROD,volume 11))

  • 1950 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews a pilot study undertaken at Sheffield Hallam University in the computing department in which the teaching period was shortened from a semester-long delivery to a slightly extended week of intensive study. The case study investigates the delivery of a module on a Computing MSc course. The module concerned is one of ten in the course. Each module is usually taught in the standard, institutionally defined semester period. In this case, we are talking of 12 weeks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blundell R. Human capital investment: the returns from education and training to the individual, the firm and the economy. Fisc Stud. 1999;20(1):1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Roy S, Hinings CR. Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad Manage J. 2002;45(1):58–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford DM. Managing creative people: strategies and tactics for innovation. Hum Res Manage Rev. 2000;10(3):313–51. ISSN 1053-4822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00043-1.(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053482299000431).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden P. Learning to teach in higher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer; 2003. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 5 July 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM. The leader’s new work: Building learning organizations. Sloan Manage Rev. 1990; 32(1):7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DD, South JB, Yanchar SC, Brent GW, Stephanie A. How do instructional designers evaluate? A qualitative study of evaluation in practice. Educ Technol Res Dev. Dec 2011;59(6):885–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Lake .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lake, P. (2015). Does Duration Matter? A Case Study. In: Layne, P., Lake, P. (eds) Global Innovation of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10482-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics