Skip to main content

The Efficacy of LSA (Variant)-Based Feedback for Assessing Student Learning in an Introductory International Relations Course

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Innovation of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education

Abstract

The proliferation of social media (such as Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr), communication tools (such as WhatsApp and Skype), and data storage (such as Cloud Computing) have transformed the way educators and students collect, distribute, and interact with digital data in the classroom (Beydoun and Kulchitsky, Expert Syst Appl 32:265–276, 2007; Anderson and Whitelock, JIME 7:1–15, 2004; Trudeau 2004). This kind of technological informatization has, in turn, not only transformed the way courses are being designed and delivered (Beydoun and Kulchitsky (Expert Syst Appl 32:265–276, 2007) but has also created new opportunities for learning and its assessment. The purpose of this chapter is to study how automating and using the feedback/checking of student notes can support teaching and learning activities in an introductory level International Relations course at the American University of Kuwait. The course entitled, “Introduction to International Relations (IR101)” is taught every semester and is designed to introduce first and second year students to the most common theories, approaches, and issues in the field of International Relations. The course utilizes activities such as stand-up lectures, group projects, game simulations, and reading and writing assignments to promote critical thinking, reading and writing, communication and problem solving. A variation of the Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) is employed to extract and infer relations from the qualitative data created by students’ and the teacher during their interactions with digital information. The research is made possible by the collaboration of professors in the International Relations and Computer Science and Information Systems Departments at AUK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Shammari ET, Hamza Ahmed M. Semantic variance measures for the evaluation of automatic summarization agents. Technical Report; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T, Whitelock D. The educational semantic web: visioning and practicing the future of education. J Interact Media Educ. 2004;7:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beydoun G, Kulchitsky R, Manasseh G. Evolving semantic web with social navigation. Expert Syst Appl. 2007;32(2):265–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deerwester SC, et al. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. JASIS. 1990;41(6):391–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey EL, Burn HE, Gerdes D. Bringing the classroom to the web: effects of using new technologies to capture and deliver lectures. Res Higher Educ. 2009;5:377–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira MJM. Intelligent classrooms and smart software: teaching and learning in today’s university. Educ Inf Technol. 2012;17(1):3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulchitsky DR. Don Lavoie, Educational hypertext and the concept of hypertext learning. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. 2009;2009(1):2598–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle E, Zuercher N. The writing approaches of university students. Higher Educ. 2001;42(3):373–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makany T, Kemp J, Dror IE. Optimising the use of note-taking as an external cognitive aid for increasing learning. Brit J Educ Technol. 2009;40(4):619–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath AL, Taylor A, Pychyl TA. Writing helpful feedback: the influence of feedback type on students’ perceptions and writing performance. Can J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2011;2(2):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson S, Liu M. Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. ETR&D. 2003;51(2):57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stover WJ. Simulating the Cuban missile crisis: crossing timeand space in virtual reality. Int Stud Perspect. 2007;8(1):111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigel VB. Deep learning for a digital age. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels SAJ, Sandra AJ, Kester L, Van Merrienboer JJG. Adapting prior knowledge activation: mobilisation, perspective taking, and learners’ prior knowledge. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(1):16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RL, Eggert AC. Notetaking in college classes: student patterns and instructional strategies. J Gen Educ. 2002;51(3):173–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Roman Kulchitsky Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kulchitsky, D., Zeid, A., Hamza, A. (2015). The Efficacy of LSA (Variant)-Based Feedback for Assessing Student Learning in an Introductory International Relations Course. In: Layne, P., Lake, P. (eds) Global Innovation of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10482-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics