Abstract
Social networks (SN) provide a great opportunity to help people interact with each other in different ways depending on the kind of relationship that links them. One of the aims of SN is to be flexible in the way one shares information, being as permissive as possible in how people communicate and disseminate information. While preserving the spirit of SN, users would like to be sure that their privacy is not compromised. One way to do so is by providing users with means to define their own privacy policies and give guarantees that they will be respected. In this paper we present a privacy policy framework for SN, consisting of a formal model of SN, a knowledge-based logic, and a formal privacy policy language. The framework may be tailored by providing suitable instantiations of the different relationships, the events, the propositions representing what is to be known, and the additional facts or rules a particular social network should satisfy. Besides, models of Facebook and Twitter are instantiated in our formalism, and we provide instantiations of a number of richer privacy policies.
Supported by the Swedish funding agency SSF under the grant Data Driven Secure Business Intelligence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aucher, G., Boella, G., Torre, L.: A dynamic logic for privacy compliance. Artificial Intelligence and Law 19(2-3), 187–231 (2011)
Bruns, G., Fong, P.W., Siahaan, I., Huth, M.: Relationship-based access control: its expression and enforcement through hybrid logic. In: CODASPY 2012, pp. 117–124. ACM (2012)
Datta, A., Blocki, J., Christin, N., DeYoung, H., Garg, D., Jia, L., Kaynar, D.K., Sinha, A.: Understanding and protecting privacy: Formal semantics and principled audit mechanisms. In: Jajodia, S., Mazumdar, C. (eds.) ICISS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7093, pp. 1–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning about knowledge, vol. 4. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
Fong, P.W.: Relationship-based access control: Protection model and policy language. In: CODASPY 2011, pp. 191–202. ACM (2011)
Greschbach, B., Kreitz, G., Buchegger, S.: The devil is in the metadata - new privacy challenges in decentralised online social networks. In: PerCom Workshops, pp. 333–339. IEEE (2012)
Le Métayer, D.: Privacy by design: A formal framework for the analysis of architectural choices. In: CODASPY 2013, pp. 95–104. ACM (2013)
Lomuscio, A., Ryan, M.: On the relation between interpreted systems and kripke models. In: Wobcke, W., Pagnucco, M., Zhang, C. (eds.) Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Formalisms, Methodologies, and Applications. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1441, pp. 46–59. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Ruan, J., Thielscher, M.: A logic for knowledge flow in social networks. In: Wang, D., Reynolds, M. (eds.) AI 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7106, pp. 511–520. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Seligman, J., Liu, F., Girard, P.: Facebook and the epistemic logic of friendship. In: TARK 2013 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pardo, R., Schneider, G. (2014). A Formal Privacy Policy Framework for Social Networks. In: Giannakopoulou, D., Salaün, G. (eds) Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8702. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10431-7_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10431-7_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10430-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10431-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)