Reduced-Dose Patient to Baseline CT Rigid Registration in 3D Radon Space

  • Guy Medan
  • Achia Kronman
  • Leo Joskowicz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8673)


We present a new method for rigid registration of CT scans in Radon space. The inputs are the two 3D Radon transforms of the CT scans, one densely sampled and the other sparsely sampled. The output is the rigid transformation that best matches them. The algorithm starts by finding the best matching between each direction vector in the sparse transform and the corresponding direction vector in the dense transform. It then solves the system of linear equations derived from the direction vector pairs. Our method can be used to register two CT scans and to register a baseline scan to the patient with reduced-dose scanning without compromising registration accuracy. Our preliminary simulation results on the Shepp-Logan head phantom dataset and a pair of clinical head CT scans indicates that our 3D Radon space rigid registration method performs significantly better than image-based registration for very few scan angles and comparably for densely-sampled scans.


Direction Vector Rigid Transformation Normalize Cross Correlation Rigid Registration Normal Direction Vector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Chodick, G., Ronckers, C.M., Shalev, V., Ron, E., et al.: Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to radiation exposure from computed tomography examinations in children. IMAJ-RAMAT GAN 9(8), 584 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mettler Jr., F.A., Wiest, P.W., Locken, J.A., Kelsey, C.A.: CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. Journal of Radiological Protection 20(4), 353 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Freiman, M., Pele, O., Hurvitz, A., Werman, M., Joskowicz, L.: Spectral-based 2d/3d X-ray to CT image rigid registration. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 79641B–79641B (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mao, W., Li, T., Wink, N., Xing, L.: CT image registration in sinogram space. Medical Physics 34(9), 3596–3602 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mooser, R., Forsberg, F., Hack, E., Székely, G., Sennhauser, U.: Estimation of affine transformations directly from tomographic projections in two and three dimensions. Machine Vision and Applications 24(2), 419–434 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    You, J., Lu, W., Li, J., Gindi, G., Liang, Z.: Image matching for translation, rotation and uniform scaling by the radon transform. In: Proceedings of the 1998 International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 1998, vol. 1, pp. 847–851. IEEE (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu, W., Fitchard, E.E., Olivera, G.H., You, J., Ruchala, K.J., Aldridge, J.S., Mackie, T.R.: Image/patient registration from (partial) projection data by the fourier phase matching method. Physics in Medicine and Biology 44(8), 2029 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guy Medan
    • 1
  • Achia Kronman
    • 1
  • Leo Joskowicz
    • 1
  1. 1.The Rachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and EngineeringThe Hebrew University of JerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations