Abstract
In this chapter, I focus on the English language learning context in China and use data collected during the period when Beijing was preparing for and hosting the 2008 Olympic Games (2006–2008) to examine how English and the study of English are perceived and accessed by learners engaged in teaching and learning English outside formal educational institutions, namely, Olympic community English classes and English corners. In particular, I will explore, via interviews and group discussions, the reasons underlying learners’ voluntary choice of English learning, their perceptions of the status of English relative to Chinese in a globalising context, the potential influence English imposes on Chinese language and culture and the significance of English to Chinese society. My research findings show that my informants associate English (learning) with multiple benefits to life and career; they express a strong confidence that English will not be a threat to the Chinese language and culture, and they claim that English is useful to the development of China now and in the long run. Besides presenting and interpreting the prevailing English language ideologies as captured in the discourse of my research respondents, in the last section of the chapter, I will explore the possible social, cultural and political factors which caused the ideologies of language to emerge and the implications borne by these ideologies in the context of China’s ongoing globalisation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Olympic English classes were gradually set up in various residential communities in Beijing after China’s successful bid for the Olympic Games in 2001. They were usually advocated and organised by enthusiastic retired residents, sponsored by local resident committees as free venues where English was taught by volunteer English teachers. The goal of Olympic English classes was to prepare the local citizens to become Olympic language volunteers and to otherwise improve the quality of residents’ language ability. There were no compulsory textbooks.
- 2.
English corners were locations where people from various walks of life gathered together, usually once a week, to practice English. They were usually loosely organised in that no local authority was involved and people were free to join and leave. The only principle unanimously observed was that English, not Chinese, should be used in conversations. Please refer to Gao (2009) for more information on English corner in China.
References
Adamson, B. (2002). Barbarian as a foreign language: English in China’s schools. World Englishes, 21(2), 231–243.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blommaert, J. (2008b). Notes on power. Working paper in language diversity. University of Jyväskylä.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. California: Sage Publications.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and Polity.
Brutt-Griffler, J. (2002). World English: A study of its development. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Cai, X. L. (2006). Critical thoughts on the whole nation studies English [Dui quan min ying yu re de leng si kao]. Journal of Higher Correspondence Education, 1, 30–31.
Calvet, L.-J. (2006). Towards an ecology of world languages (trans: Brown, A.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cooke, D. (1988). Ties that constrict: English as a trojan horse. In A. Cumming, A. Gagné, & J. Dawson (Eds.), Awareness: Proceedings of the 1987 TESL Ontario Conference (pp. 56–62). Ontario: TESL Ontario.
Crystal, D. (1997a). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Day, R. R. (1985). The ultimate inequality: Linguistic genocide. In N. Wolfson & J. Manes (Eds.), The language of inequality (pp. 163–181). Amsterdam: Mouton.
De Swaan, A. (2001). Words of the world: The global language system. Cambridge: Polity.
Flaitz, J. (1988). The ideology of English: French perception of English as a world language. Berlin: Mouton de gruyter.
Gal, S., & Irvine, J. (1995). The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research, 62, 967–1001.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Guangzhou Daily. (2008, July 31). Available at http://news.xinhuanet.com/olympics/2008-07/31/content_8869032_1.htm. Last accessed on 08 Jan 2009.
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Irvine, J. T. (1989). When talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist, 16, 248–267.
Kachru, B. B. (1990). The alchemy of English: The spread, function, and models of non-native Englishes. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Mayr, A. (2008). Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. London: Continuum.
McCrum, R., MacNeil, R., & Cran, W. (2002). The story of English, new and revised edn. London: Faber and Faber and BBC Books.
McKay, S. L., & Bokhorst-Heng, W. D. (2008). International English in its sociolinguistic contexts: Towards a socially sensitive EIL pedagogy. London: Routledge.
Mühlhäusler, P. (1996). Linguistic ecology: Language change and linguistic imperialism in the pacific region. London: Routledge.
Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. London: Longman.
Phillipson, R., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1996). English only worldwide or language ecology? TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 429–452.
Seargeant, P. (2008). Language, ideology and ‘English within a globalized context’. World Englishes, 27(2), 217–232.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education or worldwide diversity and human rights? London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Phillipson, R. (1995). Linguicide and linguicism. In R. Phillipson & T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds.), Papers in European language policy (pp. 83–91). Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetscenter, Lingvistgruppen.
Wallerstein, I. (1997). The time of space and the space of time: The future of social science. New York: Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economies.
Wallerstein, I. M. (2000b). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press.
Wallerstein, I. M. (2004b). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.
Woolard, K. A. (2004). Is the past a foreign country? Time, language origins, and the nation in early modern Spain. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(1), 57–80.
Zhou, C. (2007). Global Englishes: A challenge for English pedagogy in China. Journal of English as an International Language, 2, 82–102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pan, L. (2015). English Language Ideologies in Olympic Beijing. In: English as a Global Language in China. English Language Education, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10392-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10392-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10391-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10392-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)