Abstract
This work explores school funding reform in response to court orders in both Kentucky and Tennessee. The research examines the environment that precipitated funding reform. A central focus of the research involves exploring the impact of funding reforms focused on equity among districts. The results suggest that equity-based reforms in Kentucky and Tennessee have not resulted in significant improvements in student achievement in either state. Further, the findings indicate an exacerbation of the funding gap among districts in both states. The researcher concludes by offering initial comparisons of the systems in Kentucky and Tennessee to the more successful systems in Wisconsin and Iowa. A preliminary discussion of education funding approaches in other southern states is also included.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Addonizio MF, Phelps JL (1983) Michigan public school finance: the last ten years. J Educ Finance 8:5–16
Alexander K, Shiver L (1983) Equalization among Florida school districts. J Educ Finance 9:55–62
Archer J (2005) Weighty decisions. Educ Week 24:20–22
Augenblick J, Myers J, Anderson A (1997) Equity and adequacy in school funding. Future Child 7:63–78
Berne R, Stiefel L (1984) The measurement of equity in school finance: conceptual, methodological and empirical dimensions. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Biddle BJ (1997) Foolishness, dangerous nonsense, and real correlates of state differences in achievement. Phi Delta Kappan 78:8–14
Bracey GW (1995) Debunking the myths about money for schools. Educ Leader 53(3):65–70
Card D, Payne A (2000) School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores. J Publ Econ 83:49–82
Chaudhari RB, Hickrod GAK, Hubbard BC (1983) The decline and fall of school finance reform in Illinois. J Educ Finance 9:17–28
Cohen DK, Barnes CA (1993) Conclusion: a new pedagogy for policy. In: Cohen DK, McLaughlin MW, Talbert EJ (eds) Teaching for understanding: challenges for policy and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 237–263
Conley DT, Goldman P (2000) Half full, half empty? Educator responses over time to state-level systemic reforms. Int J Educ Reform 9:249–260
Cronk CA, Johnson G (1983) An equity analysis of Pennsylvania’s basic instruction subsidy program. J Educ Finance 8:502–510
Dayton J (1998) An examination of judicial treatment of rural schools in public funding equity litigation. J Educ Finance 24:179–205
Dove R (1991) Acorns in a mountain pool: the role of litigation, law and lawyers in Kentucky Education reform. J Educ Finance 17:83–119
Duncombe W, Yinger J (1997) Why is it so hard to help central city schools? J Pol Anal Manag 16:85–113
Duncombe W, Ruggerio J, Yinger J (1996) Alternative approaches to measuring the cost of education. In: Ladd HF (ed) Holding schools accountable: performance-based reform in education. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
Ehrenhalt A (2005) School finance forever. Governing 18:20
Ellinger K, Wright DE, Hirlinger MW (1995) Brains for the bucks? School revenue and student achievement in Oklahoma. Soc Sci J 32(3):299–309
Enrich P (1995) Leaving equality behind: new directions in school finance reform. Vanderbilt Law Review 48:101–194
Erekson H, Mitroff RC (1988) Equity trends in Ohio school finance, 1976-1984. Econ Educ Rev 7(2):245–250
Farrow F, Joe T (1992) Financing school-linked, integrated services. Future Child 2:56–67
Feldstein M (1975) Wealth neutrality and local choice in public education. Am Econ Rev 65:75–89
Finn C (1988) The biggest reform of all. Phi Delta Kappan 71:584–592
Finn CE Jr (1992) Introduction. In: Finn CE Jr, Rebarber T (eds) Educational reform in the 90s. Macmillan, New York, pp 3–20
Fisher R (1996) State and local public finance, 2nd edn. Irwin, Chicago and Boston
Fisher R, Wassmer R (1995) Centralizing educational responsibility in Michigan and other states: new constraints on states and localities. Natl Tax J 48:417–428
Fuhrman S, Clune WH, Elmore RF (1988) Research on education reform: lessons on the implementation of policy. Teachers Coll Rec 90:237–257
Geske TG, LaCost BY (1990) The student equity effects of the public school finance system in Louisiana. Econ Educ Rev 9(1):55–65
Goe L (2006) Evaluating a state-sponsored school improvement program through an improved school finance lens. J Educ Finance 31:395–419
Goertz ME (1994) The finances of poor school districts. Clearing House 68(2):74–78
Greenwald R, Hedges L, Laine R (1996) The effect of school resources on student achievement. Rev Educ Res 66:361–396
Guthrie J (1980) Should financial support of schools be assumed completely by states? Educ Eval Pol Anal 2:86–87
Guthrie J, Garms W, Pierce L (1988) School finance and education policy: enhancing Educational efficiency, equality, and choice, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Hallinger P (1992) The evolving role of American principals: from managerial to instruction to transformational leaders. J Educ Admin 30:35–48
Hanushek E (1995) Moving beyond spending fetishes. Educ Leader 53(3):60–65
Hanushek E (1997) Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: an update. Educ Eval Pol Anal 19:141–164
Hertert L (1996) Systemic school reform in the 1990s: a local perspective. Educ Pol 10:379–398
Hess F (2005) Inside the gift horse’s mouth: philanthropy and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan 87:131–138
Howell P, Miller B (1997) Sources of funding for schools. Future Child 7:39–50
Husted T, Kenny L (2000) Evidence on the impact of state government on primary and secondary education and the equity-efficiency trade-off. J Law Econ 43:285–308
Jennings FJ (1995) School reform based on what is taught and what is not. Phi Delta Kappan 76:765–769
Jones HB, Salmon RG (1985) A seven year fiscal equalization analysis of the Virginia public school finance system. J Educ Finance 10:524–534
Kentucky Department of Education (1995) Kentucky Education Reform: the first five years. Kentucky Department of Education, Frankfort
Kirp DL, Driver CE (1995) The aspirations of systemic reform meet the realities of localism. Educ Adm Q 31:589–612
Ko J (2006) The impact of new funding formula on school finance equity in Missouri. Education 126:559–569
Manafo M (2006) Enhancing the value of public education: lessons from the private sector. Phi Delta Kappan 87:648–653
Martin KV (1994) Opening the door for education reform. Memphis State University Law Review 24:393–410
McCarthy M (1994) The courts and school finance reform. Theory Pract 33:89–97
Miller PM (1994) Kentucky politics and government. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln
Mintrom M (1993) Why efforts to equalize school funding have failed: towards a positive theory. Pol Res Q 46:847–862
Monk D (1990) Education finance: an economic approach. McGraw Hill, New York
Morgan E (1985) Obstacles to educational equity: state reform and local response in Massachusetts, 1978-1983. J Educ Finance 10:441–459
Moser M, Rubenstein R (2002) The equality of public school district funding in the United States: a national status report. Publ Admin Rev 62(1):63–73
Murphy J (1991) Restructuring schools: capturing and assessing the phenomena. Teachers College Press, New York
NCES (2003) National Public Education Financial Survey. Reported to the U.S. Department of Education for academic year 2002–2003
Odden A, Clune W (1998) School finance systems: aging structures in need of renovation. Educ Eval Pol Anal 20:157–177
Odden A, Picus L (1992) School finance: a policy perspective. McGraw-Hill, New York
Payne K, Biddle B (1999) Poor school funding, child poverty, and mathematics achievement. Educ Res 28:4–13
Petrosko JM (1990) The role of evaluation in statewide education reform: Kentucky as a case study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Washington, DC
Petrosko JM (1991) Evaluation and system-wide educational change: Kentucky school reform in its second year. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Chicago, IL
Pipho C (1998) The value-added side of standards. Phi Delta Kappan 79(5):341–343
Reed DS (1998) Twenty-five years after Rodriguez: school finance litigation and the impact of new judicial federalism. Law Soc Rev 32:175–220
Rose V. Council for Better Education, 790S.W.2d 186 (1989)
Serban A, Burke J (1998) Meeting the performance funding challenge: a nine-state comparative analysis. Publ Prod Manag Rev 22:157–176
Slavin R (1994) After the victory: making funding equity make a difference. Theory Pract 33:98–103
Supreme Court of Tennessee. Tennessee Small School Systems, et al. v. Ned Ray McWherter, et al. [851S.W.2d139, 151] Nashville: March 22, 1993
Trimble SC, Forsaith AC (1995) Achieving equity and excellence in Kentucky education. Univ Michigan J Law Reform 28:599–653
Vergari S (1995) School finance reform in the state of Michigan. J Educ Finance 21:254–270
Walter F, Sweetland S (2003) School finance reform: an unresolved issue across the nation. Education 124:143–151
Weber BA (1995) Financing K-12 education in Oregon, National Public Policy Education Conference, 163–170
Wenglinsky H (1998) Finance equalization and within-school equity: the relationship between education spending and the social distributions of achievement. Educ Eval Pol Anal 20:269–283
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spears, A. (2015). Review of Literature. In: School Funding and Student Achievement. SpringerBriefs in Political Science, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10317-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10317-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10316-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10317-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)