Advertisement

Energy-Efficient Roaming for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks

  • Dionysis XenakisEmail author
  • Nikos Passas
  • Lazaros Merakos
  • Christos Verikoukis
Chapter
  • 1.4k Downloads
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)

Abstract

Heterogeneous networks enable multi-standard terminals to provide increased Quality of Experience with the ability to always stay connected. Nevertheless, the price paid for multiplicity of active radio interfaces and increased data rates is the rise in energy consumption of multi-standard terminals. This factor coupled with the slow progress in battery technology creates the so called energy trap, which at times can limit the mobile user to the nearest electricity socket creating a real paradox to the headlines of 4G and future generations in terms of unrestricted mobility. Therefore real solutions need to be in place that can support unrestricted roaming, but in an energy efficient manner whilst maintaining Quality of Service (QoS). Today’s mobile networking environment is already considering a HetNet (Heterogeneous networking) environment, with LTE release 12 considering the ABS (almost blank space) approach for coordinated interference management between macro and femto cells (3GPP, Technical report on UMTS heterogeneous networks, 2013, [1]). Therefore, specific user case that can handle mobility management between femto and macro cells, and in a more broader sense vertical handovers will be aligned with current technology trends in 3GPP, and ease the stringent requirements on interference management as well promote the coexistence and dense deployment of heterogeneous small cells, that can include WLAN hotspots among others. In this chapter, we discuss the key aspects of vertical handover (VHO); focusing on the IEEE 802.11 and 3GPP LTE-Advanced network and propose a novel VHO decision algorithm. Following a similar approach, we discuss the key challenges for (horizontal) handover in macrocell–femtocell network, and propose a novel interference-aware decision algorithm as well. The key features of both algorithms is that they are fully compatible with the IEEE and the 3GPP systems, while they focus on minimizing the energy consumption of mobile terminals; a critical requirement for 4G heterogeneous systems and the foreseen 5G system.

Keywords

Vertical Handover SINR Target Reference Signal Receive Power Close Subscriber Group Handover Decision Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    3GPP: Technical report on UMTS heterogeneous networks, TR 25.800 V12.1.0, Dec 2013Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    IEEEStd 802.11-2012 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.11-2007): IEEE standard for information technology-telecommunications and information exchange between systems-local and metropolitan area networks-specific requirements—part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications, Mar 2012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yan, X., Şekercioğlu, Y.A., Narayanan, S.: A survey of vertical handover decision algorithms in fourth generation heterogeneous wireless networks. Comput. Netw. 54(11), 1848–1863 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    3GPP: E-UTRA and E-UTRAN overall description, TS 36.300 V10.7.0, Mar 2012Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    3GPP: Access to the 3GPP evolved packet core (EPC) via non-3GPP access networks, TS 24.302 V10.4.0, Jun 2011Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    3GPP: Architecture enhancements for non-3GPP accesses, TS 24.402 V10.4.0, Jun 2011Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andrews, J.G., Claussen, H., Dohler, M., Rangan, S., Reed, M.C.: Femtocells: past, present, and future. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 30(3), 497–508 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Telecoms & Media: Small cell market status, Small Cell Forum, Feb 2012Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xenakis, D., Passas, N., Merakos, L., Verikoukis, C.: Mobility management for femtocells in LTE-advanced: key aspects and survey of handover decision algorithms. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 16(1), 64–91 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    3GPP: Physical layer; measurements, TS 36.214 V10.1.0, Mar 2011Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xenakis, D., Passas, N., Radwan, A., Rodriguez, J., Verikoukis, C.: Energy efficient mobility management for the macrocell–femtocell LTE network. In: Eissa, M. (ed.) Energy Efficiency—The Innovative Ways for Smart Energy, the Future Towards Modern Utilities. InTech Publishers, Winchester (2012). ISBN:978-953-51-0800-9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xenakis, D., Passas, N., Verikoukis, C.: An energy-centric handover decision algorithm for the integrated LTE macrocell–femtocell network computer communications. Comput. Commun. 35(14), 1684–1694 (2012). ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xenakis, D., Passas, N., Verikoukis, C.: A novel handover decision policy for reducing power transmissions in the two-tier LTE network. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Communications Conference (IEEE ICC) 2012, Jun 2012Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang, J., de la Roche, G.: Femtocells: Technologies and Deployment. Wiley, New York, ISBN: 978-0-470-74298-3, 2010Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xenakis, D., Passas, N., Di Gregorio, L., Verikoukis, C.: A context-aware vertical handover framework towards energy-efficiency. In: Proceedings of 73rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), pp. 1–5, May 2011Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feeney LM., Nilsson, M.: Investigating the energy consumption of a wireless network interface in an ad hoc networking environment. In: Proceedings of 12th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2001), vol. 3, pp. 1548–1557 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, J.-S., Lin, C.-H.R.: ECTP: an energy-efficiency label-switching MAC protocol for infrastructure wireless networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 56(3), 1399–1417 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xenakis, D., Passas, N., Merakos, L.: Multi-parameter performance analysis for decentralized cognitive radio networks. Wirel. Netw. 20(4), 787–803 (2013). doi: 10.1007/s11276-013-0635-4
  19. 19.
    Small Cell Forum: Interference management in OFDMA femtocells. Small Cell Forum, Mar 2010Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xenakis, D., Passas, N., Merakos, L., Verikoukis, C.: Energy-efficient and interference-aware handover decision for the LTE-advanced femtocell network. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Communications Conference (IEEE ICC), pp. 2464–2468, Jun 2013Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang, H., Ma, W., Li, W., Zheng, W., Wen, X., Jiang, C.: Signalling cost evaluation of handover management schemes in LTE-advanced femtocell. In: Proceedings of 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (Spring), pp. 1–5, May 2011Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dionysis Xenakis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nikos Passas
    • 1
  • Lazaros Merakos
    • 1
  • Christos Verikoukis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Informatics and TelecommunicationsUniversity of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Telecommunications Technological Centre of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations