Skip to main content

Moral Conscience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Religious Morality in John Henry Newman
  • 369 Accesses

Abstract

Just as moral law is a practical foundation of religious morality in Newman’s thought, so is moral conscience. There is a tendency to interpret religious morality in his writings from the narrow perspective of conscience alone. However, his view of conscience needs to be interpreted more broadly in relation to his hermeneutics of the imagination. Conscience has two main functions: a moral sense (presenting a judgment of reason as a rule of right conduct) and a sense of duty (portraying a magisterial dictate as a sanction of right conduct). These functions can be explained by connecting the concepts of rationality and responsibility with the concepts of autonomy and theonomy. The moral sense represents the rationality of conscience, being its autonomous characteristic that engages both the abstract and concrete processes of reason – this is similar to but broader than the application of moral law. The moral sense determines when moral judgments attain certitude. This function reflects his hermeneutics of the imagination. The sense of duty represents the responsibility of conscience before God, being its theonomous characteristic that engages the magisterial dictate of a divine voice – but this does not entail an argument for the existence of God. The sense of duty introduces a theological dimension for conscience that provides a religious interpretation for the moral sense (dealing with truth) and confers religious meaning to moral character (dealing with holiness). This function reflects his theological hermeneutics. Often the sense of duty is viewed as the primary function of conscience, but the analysis explains that the moral sense has that role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rule (2004).

  2. 2.

    Boekraad (1981); Bak (1973).

  3. 3.

    Walgrave (1986).

  4. 4.

    Biemer and Goeppert (1980); Schüller (1986), 62.

  5. 5.

    Sillem (1969–1970), II, 31, note 2.

  6. 6.

    Merrigan (2008), 17–18.

  7. 7.

    Crehan (1978).

  8. 8.

    Coulson (1980).

  9. 9.

    Artz (1980).

  10. 10.

    Short (2006); Ford (2005).

  11. 11.

    Hughes (2009), 191; Yearley (1978), 94.

  12. 12.

    McCarthy (1981); McCarthy (1977), 148.

  13. 13.

    Lindley (2010), 23; Hughes (2009), 197–200; Hughes (2004), 55–62; Hochschild (2003).

  14. 14.

    Holmes (1979), 290.

  15. 15.

    Nabe (1988), 35; Keane (1984), 26, 108–109.

  16. 16.

    Magill (1993).

  17. 17.

    Aquinas (1948), 1ae, 11ae, Q. 19, art.5.

  18. 18.

    Walgrave (1960), 353.

  19. 19.

    Tillman (2008).

  20. 20.

    Keane (1984), 26, 34, 109.

  21. 21.

    Grave (1989), 34–37, 57.

  22. 22.

    Hughes (2009), 192.

  23. 23.

    Pojman (1986), 86; Fey (1976) 105; Pailin (1969), 177.

  24. 24.

    Ker (1985), lxvi, note 2; Ferreira (1980), 23; Lash (1979), 17–18.

  25. 25.

    Jonsen and Toulmin (1988), 174.

  26. 26.

    Ferreira (1987), 189–197.

  27. 27.

    Jago (1981), 61.

  28. 28.

    Kent (1980).

  29. 29.

    Newman (1986), 78.

  30. 30.

    Ledek (1996), 28–42; Weidner (1990), lxxi–lxxii; Mackie (1982), 103–106.

  31. 31.

    Conn (2010), 113–121; Conn (1981, 2009).

  32. 32.

    Beaumont et al. (2012).

  33. 33.

    Dupré (2002).

  34. 34.

    Crosby (2004), 64–92; Crosby (1986).

  35. 35.

    Merrigan (2009), 49–51.

  36. 36.

    Merrigan (2008), 24–26; Crosby (2004), 93–112; Ledek (1996), 57–83; Kenny (1990) 119–120.

  37. 37.

    Rupert (2010), chapter 3.

  38. 38.

    Bischofberger (1974), 101–104, 117.

  39. 39.

    Norris (1977), 93.

  40. 40.

    Schüller (1986), 64.

  41. 41.

    Hughes (2009), 214–216; Kant (1964), 104–105.

  42. 42.

    Crowley (1991), 137–138, 150.

  43. 43.

    Crowe (1977).

  44. 44.

    Walgrave (1960), 152–153.

  45. 45.

    Barmann (1964), 217.

  46. 46.

    Lonergan (1974), 148; Surlis (1971); Rahner (1963), 235–263.

  47. 47.

    Böckle (1980), 63.

  48. 48.

    Fuchs (1983), 101.

  49. 49.

    Morgan (1996); Fuchs (1980).

  50. 50.

    Morgan (1996), 369–527; Walgrave (1971, 1976, 1982b, c).

  51. 51.

    Crosby (1989); Tollefsen (1987); Fuchs (1983), 45; Fuchs (1971).

  52. 52.

    Fuchs (1984), 40; Fuchs (1983), 45–46, 101, 220–221.

  53. 53.

    Schüller (1986), 15–42; Fuchs (1983), 54–57.

  54. 54.

    Fuchs (1983), 45–46, 101.

  55. 55.

    Gustafson (1981), 3, 92, 134–135; Gustafson (1975), 174.

  56. 56.

    de Achaval and Holmes (1976), I, 139.

  57. 57.

    Walgrave (1960), 361.

  58. 58.

    Brechtken (1973), 64.

  59. 59.

    Casey (1984), 63.

  60. 60.

    Miller (1987), 33; Collins (1961), 19.

  61. 61.

    Mongrain (2009); Roberts (2007); Rule (2004), 5, 9–10, 160; Armour (1986), 89–90; Boekraad (1979), 238–242, 247; Boekraad (1974) 139–142; O’Donoghue (1975), 256–268; O’Donoghue (1970), 21–22; Sillem (1964); Boekraad and Tristram (1961), 53–87; Nedoncelle (1945), 52, 64–65.

  62. 62.

    Gaffney (1992); Gaffney (1988), 156–157.

  63. 63.

    Crosby (2004), 110–111.

  64. 64.

    Ledek (1996); Sillem (1969–1970), II, 59, note 2.

  65. 65.

    Hughes (2009), 210–213.

  66. 66.

    Merrigan (2008), 26–27; Walgrave (1981), 63–73, 148; Walgrave (1960), 221–223, 228.

  67. 67.

    Miller (2008), 142.

  68. 68.

    Boekraad and Tristram (1961), 119.

  69. 69.

    Boekraad and Tristram (1961), 121; Sillem (1969–1970), II, 67.

  70. 70.

    Boekraad and Tristram (1961), 71, 74.

  71. 71.

    Rosenberg (2007).

  72. 72.

    Merrigan (2003).

  73. 73.

    DeLaura (1969), 33.

  74. 74.

    Coulson (1970), 89.

  75. 75.

    Ferreira (1980), 136–137.

  76. 76.

    Miller (2010).

  77. 77.

    Connolly (2008); Dessain (1962).

  78. 78.

    Magill (1991).

References

  • Aquinas, T. 1948. The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: Benzinger Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour, L. 1986. Anselm and proof of the existence of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19: 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artz, J. 1980. Illative Sense und Gewissen. Newman Studien XI: 123–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, F. 1973. Bernard Haring’s interpretation of Cardinal Newman’s treatise on conscience. Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 49: 124–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmann, L.F. 1964. The notion of personal Sin in Newman’s thought. Downside Review 82: 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastable, J.D. (ed.). 1978. Newman and Gladstone. Centennial essays. Dublin: Veritas Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, K., et al. 2012. Newman et Blondel: Conscience et Intelligence. Saint-Maur: Parole et silence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemer, G., and S. Goeppert. 1980. Die humanwissenschaftlichen Grundlagen des Gewissens und seine Rolle in der Vermittlung religioser Erfahrung. Newman Studien XI: 85–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischofberger, E. 1974. Die Sittlichen Voraussetzungen des Glaubens. Zur Fundamentalethik John Henry Newmans mit einem vorwort von Heinrich Fries. Mainz: Mattias- Grunewald-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böckle, F. 1980. Fundamental moral theology. Dublin: Gill and MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekraad, A.J. 1974. The personal conquest of truth. Louvain Studies V: 136–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekraad, A.J. 1979. Conscience in the vision of Cardinal John Henry Newman. Divus Thomas 82: 233–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekraad, A.J. 1981. Dialogue and conscience according to J. H. Newman. Downside Review 84: 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekraad, A.J., and H. Tristram. 1961. The argument from conscience to the existence of God according to J. H. Newman. Louvain: Nauwelaerts Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechkten, J. 1973. Real-Erfahrung bei Newman. Die personalistische Alternative zu Kants transzendentalem Subjektivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Gerhard Kaffke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. (ed.). 1990. Newman: A man for our time. Harrisburg: Morehouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, G. 1984. Natural reason. A study of the notions of inference, assent, intuition, and first principles in the philosophy of John Henry Cardinal Newman. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. 1961. Philosophical readings in Cardinal Newman. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conn, W.E. 1981. Conscience. Development and self-transcendence. Alabama: Religious Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conn, W.E. 2009. Newman and conscience. Newman Studies Journal 6(2): 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conn, W.E. 2010. Conscience and conversion in Newman. A developmental study of self in John Henry Newman. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J.R. 2008. Newman’s notion of the indwelling of the holy spirit in the Parochial and Plain Sermons. Newman Studies Journal 5(1): 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, J. 1970. Newman and the common tradition. A study in the language of church and society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, J. 1980. The meaning and function of imagination according to J. H. Newman, and its relation to his conception of conscience and the church. Newman Studien XI: 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crehan, J. 1978. The theology of conscience. In Newman and Gladstone. Centennial essays, ed. J.D. Bastable, 211–220. Dublin: Veritas Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, J.F. 1986. The encounter of God and man in moral obligation. The New Scholasticism 60(2): 317–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, J.F. 1989. Autonomy and theonomy in moral obligation: Reply to Tollefsen. The New Scholasticism 63(3): 358–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, J.F. 2004. Personalist papers. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, L. (ed.). 1981. Shadows and images. Melbourne: The Polding Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, M.B. 1977. The changing profile of the natural law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, A.J. 1991. The performance of the grammar: Reading and writing Newman’s narrative of assent. Renascence 43(1–2): 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, C., and R.A. McCormick (eds.). 1980. Readings in moral theology. The distinctiveness of Christian ethics. New York: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Achaval, H.M., and J.D. Holmes. 1976. The theological papers of John Henry Newman on faith and certainty (1846–86). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLaura, D.J. 1969. Hebrew and Hellene in Victorian England. Newman Arnold and Pater. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessain, C.S. 1962. Cardinal Newman and the doctrine of uncreated grace. Clergy Review 47: 207–225, 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, L. 2002. Newman and the neoplatonic tradition in England. In Newman and the word, ed. T. Merrigan and I. Ker, 137–154. Louvain: Eerdmans Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M.J. 1980. Doubt and religious commitment. The role of the will in Newman’s thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M.J. 1987. Scepticism and reasonable doubt. The British naturalist tradition in Wilkins, Hume, Reid, and Newman. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fey, W.R. 1976. Faith and doubt. The unfolding of Newman’s thought on certainty. Shepherdstown: Patmos Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J.T. 2005. Country, church, and conscience: John Henry Newman versus Ewart Gladstone. In Religion in public life, ed. J.T. Ford et al., 85–100. Washington, DC: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J.T., et al. (eds.). 2005. Religion in public life. Washington, DC: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, J. 1971. The absoluteness of moral terms. Gregorianum 52: 415–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, J. 1980. Is there a specifically Christian morality? In Readings in moral theology. The distinctiveness of Christian ethics, ed. C. Curran and R. McCormick, 3–19. New York: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, J. 1983. Personal responsibility and Christian morality. Dublin: Gill and MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, J. 1984. Christian ethics in a secular arena. Dublin: Gill and MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, J. 1988. Newman on the common roots of morality and religion. The Journal of Religious Ethics 16: 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, J. 1992. Conscience, consensus, and the development of doctrine. New York: Image Books, Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grave, S.A. 1989. Conscience in Newman’s thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, J. 1975. Can ethics be Christian? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, J. 1981. Theology and ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, J.P. 2003. The re-imagined Aristotelianism of John Henry Newman. Modern Age 45: 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J.D. 1979. Newman’s reaction to the development of scientific and historical criticism in England. Clergy Review LXIV: 280–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G.J. 2004. Newman and the particularity of conscience. In Newman and faith, ed. I. Ker and T. Merrigan, 53–74. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G.J. 2009. Conscience. In The Cambridge companion to John Henry Newman, ed. I. Ker and T. Merrigan, 189–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jago, J. 1981. J. H. Newman and freedom of conscience. In Shadows and images, ed. L. Cross, 61–74. Melbourne: The Polding Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A.R., and S. Toulmin. 1988. The abuse of casuistry. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1964. The Doctrine of Virtue: Part II of the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. M.J. Gregor. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, P.S. 1984. Christian ethics and imagination. A theological inquiry. New York: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A. 1990. Newman as a philosopher of religion. In Newman: A man for our time, ed. D. Brown, 98–122. Harrisburg: Morehouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, J. 1980. The secularization of conscience and Newman’s grammar of assent. Newman Studien XI: 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ker, I. 1985. An essay in aid of a grammar of assent. Edited, introduction, and notes by I. Ker. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ker, I., and T. Merrigan (eds.). 2004. Newman and faith. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ker, I., and T. Merrigan (eds.). 2009. The Cambridge companion to John Henry Newman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, N. 1979. An essay in aid of a grammar of assent, by John Henry Newman. With an introduction by N. Lash. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledek, R. 1996. The nature of conscience and its religious significance with special reference to John Henry Newman. San Francisco: International Scholars Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D.A. 2010. Probability and economy in Newman’s theory of knowledge. Newman Studies Journal 7(1): 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonergan, B. 1974. A second collection, ed. W.F.J. Ryan and B.J. Tyrrell. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.L. 1982. The miracle of theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magill, G. 1991. Newman’s view of catechesis: Safeguarding faith and morals. The Living Light 27(2): 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magill, G. 1993. Interpreting moral doctrine: Newman on conscience and law. Horizons 20(1): 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, G. 1977. Religion and certainty. John Henry Newman’s theory of first principles. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, G. 1981. Newman, foundationalism, and the ethics of belief. Horizons 8: 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrigan, T. 2003. Christianity and the non-Christian religions in the light of the theology of John Henry Newman. Irish Theological Quarterly 68: 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrigan, T. 2008. ‘Myself and my creator’: Newman and the (post-)modern subject. In Newman and truth, ed. T. Merrigan and I. Ker, 1–33. Louvain: Peeters Press/William B. Eerdmans Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrigan, T. 2009. Revelation. In The Cambridge companion to John Henry Newman, ed. I. Ker and T. Merrigan, 47–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrigan, T., and I. Ker (eds.). 2002. Newman and the word, Louvain theological and pastoral monographs. Louvain: Peeters Press/William B. Eerdmans Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrigan, T., and I. Ker (eds.). 2008. Newman and truth, Louvain theological and pastoral monographs. Louvain: Peeters Press/William B. Eerdmans Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E.J. 1987. John Henry Newman on the idea of church. Shepherdstown: The Patmos Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.H. 2008. The burdens of perfection. On ethics and reading in nineteenth-century British literature. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.B. 2010. The reasonableness of faith and assent in Newman’s Parochial and Plain Sermons and the Grammar of Assent. Newman Studies Journal 7(2): 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongrain, K. 2009. The eyes of faith: Newman’s critique of arguments from design. Newman Studies Journal 6(1): 68–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. 1996. Conscience in the writings of John Henry Newman: A test case for the possibility of a distinctively Christian ethic. A doctoral dissertation at Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabe, C. 1988. Mystery and religion. Newman’s epistemology of religion. New York: Lanham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedoncelle, M. 1945. Oeuvres Philosophique de Newman. Traduction de S. Jankelvitch, Preface et notes de M. Nedoncelle. Paris: Aubier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. 1986. The mental philosophy of John Henry Newman. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, T.J. 1977. Newman and his theological method. A guide for the theologian today. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, N.D. 1970. Is there a Christian school? Irish Theological Quarterly 37: 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, N.D. 1975. Newman and the problem of privileged access to truth. Irish Theological Quarterly 42: 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pailin, D.A. 1969. The way to faith. An examination of Newman’s grammar of assent as a response to the search for certainty in faith. London: Epworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinckaers, S., and C.J. Pinto de Oliveira. 1986. Universalité et permanence des Lois Morales. Fribourg: Editions du Cerf Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pojman, L.P. 1986. Religious belief and the will. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahner, K. 1963. The dignity and freedom of man. In Theological investigations, vol. II, 235–263. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N.K. 2007. Newman on the argument from design. New Blackfriars 88: 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, R.S. 2007. Newman on the relationship between natural and revealed religion: His university sermons and the grammar of assent. Newman Studies Journal 4(1): 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, P.C. 2004. Coleridge and Newman: The centrality of conscience. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupert, J. 2010. John Henry Newman on the nature of the mind: Reason in religion, science, and the humanities. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüller, B. 1986. Wholly human. Essays on the theory and language of morality. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, E. 2006. Gladstone and Newman. Newman Studies Journal 3(1): 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillem, E.J. 1964. Cardinal Newman’s ‘grammar of assent’ on conscience as a way to God. The Heythrop Journal V: 377–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillem, E.J. 1969–1970. The philosophical notebook, ed. E.J. Sillem, vol. 1: General introduction to the study of Newman’s philosophy, vol. 11: The text. Louvain: Nauwelaerts Publ. House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surlis, P. 1971. Rahner and Lonergan on method in theology. Irish Theological Quarterly 38: 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, M.K. 2008. ‘A rhetoric in conduct’: The gentleman of the university and the gentleman of the oratory. Newman Studies Journal 5(2): 6–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefsen, O. 1987. Crosby on the origin of the prescriptive force of moral obligation. New Scholasticism 61(autumn): 462–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, J.H. 1960. Newman. The theologian. The nature of belief and doctrine as exemplified in his life and works. London/New York: Chapman/Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, J.H. 1971. Conscience du soi et conscience de Dieu. Notes sur le ‘Cahier philosophique’ de Newman. Revue Thomiste 71: 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, J.H. 1976. La Conscience Morale et la Spécificité de la Morale Chrétienne selon J. H. Newman. Studia Moralia 14: 105–119. Also in Walgrave (1982b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, J.H. 1981. J. H. Newman: His personality, his principles, his fundamental doctrines: Course delivered by Professor J. H. Walgrave. Louvain: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, J.H. 1982a. Selected writings. Thomas Aquinas, J. H. Newman, Theologia Fundamentalis, ed. G. De Schrijver and J. Kelly. Louvain: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, J.H. 1982b. La Conscience Morale et la Spécificité de la Morale Chrétienne selon J. H. Newman. In J.H. Walgrave, Selected writings. Thomas Aquinas, J.H. Newman, Theologia Fundamentalis, ed. G. De Schrijver and J. Kelly, 203–217. Louvain: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, J.H. 1982c. Conscience du soi et conscience de Dieu. Notes sur le ‘Cahier philosophique’ de Newman. In J.H. Walgrave, Selected writings. Thomas Aquinas, J. H. Newman, Theologia Fundamentalis, 218–231. Edited by G. De Schrijver and J. Kelly. Louvain: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, J.H. 1986. La loi morale et la conscience selon le Cardinal Newman. In Universalité et permanence des Lois morales, ed. S. Pinckaers and C.J. Pinto de Oliveira, 163–171. Fribourg: Editions du Cerf Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidner, H.D. 1990. The VIA MEDIA of the Anglican church. Edited with introduction and notes by H.D. Weidner. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yearley, L.H. 1978. The ideas of Newman. Christianity and human religiosity. University Park/London: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Magill, G. (2015). Moral Conscience. In: Religious Morality in John Henry Newman. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10271-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics