Abstract
Just as moral law is a practical foundation of religious morality in Newman’s thought, so is moral conscience. There is a tendency to interpret religious morality in his writings from the narrow perspective of conscience alone. However, his view of conscience needs to be interpreted more broadly in relation to his hermeneutics of the imagination. Conscience has two main functions: a moral sense (presenting a judgment of reason as a rule of right conduct) and a sense of duty (portraying a magisterial dictate as a sanction of right conduct). These functions can be explained by connecting the concepts of rationality and responsibility with the concepts of autonomy and theonomy. The moral sense represents the rationality of conscience, being its autonomous characteristic that engages both the abstract and concrete processes of reason – this is similar to but broader than the application of moral law. The moral sense determines when moral judgments attain certitude. This function reflects his hermeneutics of the imagination. The sense of duty represents the responsibility of conscience before God, being its theonomous characteristic that engages the magisterial dictate of a divine voice – but this does not entail an argument for the existence of God. The sense of duty introduces a theological dimension for conscience that provides a religious interpretation for the moral sense (dealing with truth) and confers religious meaning to moral character (dealing with holiness). This function reflects his theological hermeneutics. Often the sense of duty is viewed as the primary function of conscience, but the analysis explains that the moral sense has that role.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Rule (2004).
- 2.
- 3.
Walgrave (1986).
- 4.
- 5.
Sillem (1969–1970), II, 31, note 2.
- 6.
Merrigan (2008), 17–18.
- 7.
Crehan (1978).
- 8.
Coulson (1980).
- 9.
Artz (1980).
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
Holmes (1979), 290.
- 15.
- 16.
Magill (1993).
- 17.
Aquinas (1948), 1ae, 11ae, Q. 19, art.5.
- 18.
Walgrave (1960), 353.
- 19.
Tillman (2008).
- 20.
Keane (1984), 26, 34, 109.
- 21.
Grave (1989), 34–37, 57.
- 22.
Hughes (2009), 192.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
Jonsen and Toulmin (1988), 174.
- 26.
Ferreira (1987), 189–197.
- 27.
Jago (1981), 61.
- 28.
Kent (1980).
- 29.
Newman (1986), 78.
- 30.
- 31.
- 32.
Beaumont et al. (2012).
- 33.
Dupré (2002).
- 34.
- 35.
Merrigan (2009), 49–51.
- 36.
- 37.
- 38.
Bischofberger (1974), 101–104, 117.
- 39.
Norris (1977), 93.
- 40.
Schüller (1986), 64.
- 41.
- 42.
Crowley (1991), 137–138, 150.
- 43.
Crowe (1977).
- 44.
Walgrave (1960), 152–153.
- 45.
Barmann (1964), 217.
- 46.
- 47.
Böckle (1980), 63.
- 48.
Fuchs (1983), 101.
- 49.
- 50.
- 51.
- 52.
- 53.
- 54.
Fuchs (1983), 45–46, 101.
- 55.
- 56.
de Achaval and Holmes (1976), I, 139.
- 57.
Walgrave (1960), 361.
- 58.
Brechtken (1973), 64.
- 59.
Casey (1984), 63.
- 60.
- 61.
- 62.
- 63.
Crosby (2004), 110–111.
- 64.
- 65.
Hughes (2009), 210–213.
- 66.
- 67.
Miller (2008), 142.
- 68.
Boekraad and Tristram (1961), 119.
- 69.
- 70.
Boekraad and Tristram (1961), 71, 74.
- 71.
Rosenberg (2007).
- 72.
Merrigan (2003).
- 73.
DeLaura (1969), 33.
- 74.
Coulson (1970), 89.
- 75.
Ferreira (1980), 136–137.
- 76.
Miller (2010).
- 77.
- 78.
Magill (1991).
References
Aquinas, T. 1948. The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: Benzinger Bros.
Armour, L. 1986. Anselm and proof of the existence of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19: 87–93.
Artz, J. 1980. Illative Sense und Gewissen. Newman Studien XI: 123–142.
Bak, F. 1973. Bernard Haring’s interpretation of Cardinal Newman’s treatise on conscience. Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 49: 124–159.
Barmann, L.F. 1964. The notion of personal Sin in Newman’s thought. Downside Review 82: 209–221.
Bastable, J.D. (ed.). 1978. Newman and Gladstone. Centennial essays. Dublin: Veritas Publications.
Beaumont, K., et al. 2012. Newman et Blondel: Conscience et Intelligence. Saint-Maur: Parole et silence.
Biemer, G., and S. Goeppert. 1980. Die humanwissenschaftlichen Grundlagen des Gewissens und seine Rolle in der Vermittlung religioser Erfahrung. Newman Studien XI: 85–122.
Bischofberger, E. 1974. Die Sittlichen Voraussetzungen des Glaubens. Zur Fundamentalethik John Henry Newmans mit einem vorwort von Heinrich Fries. Mainz: Mattias- Grunewald-Verlag.
Böckle, F. 1980. Fundamental moral theology. Dublin: Gill and MacMillan.
Boekraad, A.J. 1974. The personal conquest of truth. Louvain Studies V: 136–148.
Boekraad, A.J. 1979. Conscience in the vision of Cardinal John Henry Newman. Divus Thomas 82: 233–249.
Boekraad, A.J. 1981. Dialogue and conscience according to J. H. Newman. Downside Review 84: 63–74.
Boekraad, A.J., and H. Tristram. 1961. The argument from conscience to the existence of God according to J. H. Newman. Louvain: Nauwelaerts Publishing House.
Brechkten, J. 1973. Real-Erfahrung bei Newman. Die personalistische Alternative zu Kants transzendentalem Subjektivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Gerhard Kaffke.
Brown, D. (ed.). 1990. Newman: A man for our time. Harrisburg: Morehouse Press.
Casey, G. 1984. Natural reason. A study of the notions of inference, assent, intuition, and first principles in the philosophy of John Henry Cardinal Newman. New York: Peter Lang.
Collins, J. 1961. Philosophical readings in Cardinal Newman. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Conn, W.E. 1981. Conscience. Development and self-transcendence. Alabama: Religious Education Press.
Conn, W.E. 2009. Newman and conscience. Newman Studies Journal 6(2): 15–26.
Conn, W.E. 2010. Conscience and conversion in Newman. A developmental study of self in John Henry Newman. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Connolly, J.R. 2008. Newman’s notion of the indwelling of the holy spirit in the Parochial and Plain Sermons. Newman Studies Journal 5(1): 5–18.
Coulson, J. 1970. Newman and the common tradition. A study in the language of church and society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Coulson, J. 1980. The meaning and function of imagination according to J. H. Newman, and its relation to his conception of conscience and the church. Newman Studien XI: 53–61.
Crehan, J. 1978. The theology of conscience. In Newman and Gladstone. Centennial essays, ed. J.D. Bastable, 211–220. Dublin: Veritas Publications.
Crosby, J.F. 1986. The encounter of God and man in moral obligation. The New Scholasticism 60(2): 317–355.
Crosby, J.F. 1989. Autonomy and theonomy in moral obligation: Reply to Tollefsen. The New Scholasticism 63(3): 358–370.
Crosby, J.F. 2004. Personalist papers. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.
Cross, L. (ed.). 1981. Shadows and images. Melbourne: The Polding Press.
Crowe, M.B. 1977. The changing profile of the natural law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Crowley, A.J. 1991. The performance of the grammar: Reading and writing Newman’s narrative of assent. Renascence 43(1–2): 137–158.
Curran, C., and R.A. McCormick (eds.). 1980. Readings in moral theology. The distinctiveness of Christian ethics. New York: Paulist Press.
de Achaval, H.M., and J.D. Holmes. 1976. The theological papers of John Henry Newman on faith and certainty (1846–86). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
DeLaura, D.J. 1969. Hebrew and Hellene in Victorian England. Newman Arnold and Pater. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Dessain, C.S. 1962. Cardinal Newman and the doctrine of uncreated grace. Clergy Review 47: 207–225, 269–288.
Dupré, L. 2002. Newman and the neoplatonic tradition in England. In Newman and the word, ed. T. Merrigan and I. Ker, 137–154. Louvain: Eerdmans Publishing.
Ferreira, M.J. 1980. Doubt and religious commitment. The role of the will in Newman’s thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ferreira, M.J. 1987. Scepticism and reasonable doubt. The British naturalist tradition in Wilkins, Hume, Reid, and Newman. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fey, W.R. 1976. Faith and doubt. The unfolding of Newman’s thought on certainty. Shepherdstown: Patmos Press.
Ford, J.T. 2005. Country, church, and conscience: John Henry Newman versus Ewart Gladstone. In Religion in public life, ed. J.T. Ford et al., 85–100. Washington, DC: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Ford, J.T., et al. (eds.). 2005. Religion in public life. Washington, DC: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Fuchs, J. 1971. The absoluteness of moral terms. Gregorianum 52: 415–458.
Fuchs, J. 1980. Is there a specifically Christian morality? In Readings in moral theology. The distinctiveness of Christian ethics, ed. C. Curran and R. McCormick, 3–19. New York: Paulist Press.
Fuchs, J. 1983. Personal responsibility and Christian morality. Dublin: Gill and MacMillan.
Fuchs, J. 1984. Christian ethics in a secular arena. Dublin: Gill and MacMillan.
Gaffney, J. 1988. Newman on the common roots of morality and religion. The Journal of Religious Ethics 16: 143–159.
Gaffney, J. 1992. Conscience, consensus, and the development of doctrine. New York: Image Books, Doubleday.
Grave, S.A. 1989. Conscience in Newman’s thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gustafson, J. 1975. Can ethics be Christian? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gustafson, J. 1981. Theology and ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hochschild, J.P. 2003. The re-imagined Aristotelianism of John Henry Newman. Modern Age 45: 333–342.
Holmes, J.D. 1979. Newman’s reaction to the development of scientific and historical criticism in England. Clergy Review LXIV: 280–290.
Hughes, G.J. 2004. Newman and the particularity of conscience. In Newman and faith, ed. I. Ker and T. Merrigan, 53–74. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Hughes, G.J. 2009. Conscience. In The Cambridge companion to John Henry Newman, ed. I. Ker and T. Merrigan, 189–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jago, J. 1981. J. H. Newman and freedom of conscience. In Shadows and images, ed. L. Cross, 61–74. Melbourne: The Polding Press.
Jonsen, A.R., and S. Toulmin. 1988. The abuse of casuistry. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Kant, I. 1964. The Doctrine of Virtue: Part II of the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. M.J. Gregor. New York: Harper & Row.
Keane, P.S. 1984. Christian ethics and imagination. A theological inquiry. New York: Paulist Press.
Kenny, A. 1990. Newman as a philosopher of religion. In Newman: A man for our time, ed. D. Brown, 98–122. Harrisburg: Morehouse Press.
Kent, J. 1980. The secularization of conscience and Newman’s grammar of assent. Newman Studien XI: 62–72.
Ker, I. 1985. An essay in aid of a grammar of assent. Edited, introduction, and notes by I. Ker. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ker, I., and T. Merrigan (eds.). 2004. Newman and faith. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Ker, I., and T. Merrigan (eds.). 2009. The Cambridge companion to John Henry Newman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lash, N. 1979. An essay in aid of a grammar of assent, by John Henry Newman. With an introduction by N. Lash. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.
Ledek, R. 1996. The nature of conscience and its religious significance with special reference to John Henry Newman. San Francisco: International Scholars Publications.
Lindley, D.A. 2010. Probability and economy in Newman’s theory of knowledge. Newman Studies Journal 7(1): 20–28.
Lonergan, B. 1974. A second collection, ed. W.F.J. Ryan and B.J. Tyrrell. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.
Mackie, J.L. 1982. The miracle of theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Magill, G. 1991. Newman’s view of catechesis: Safeguarding faith and morals. The Living Light 27(2): 103–111.
Magill, G. 1993. Interpreting moral doctrine: Newman on conscience and law. Horizons 20(1): 7–22.
McCarthy, G. 1977. Religion and certainty. John Henry Newman’s theory of first principles. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
McCarthy, G. 1981. Newman, foundationalism, and the ethics of belief. Horizons 8: 68–69.
Merrigan, T. 2003. Christianity and the non-Christian religions in the light of the theology of John Henry Newman. Irish Theological Quarterly 68: 343–355.
Merrigan, T. 2008. ‘Myself and my creator’: Newman and the (post-)modern subject. In Newman and truth, ed. T. Merrigan and I. Ker, 1–33. Louvain: Peeters Press/William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Merrigan, T. 2009. Revelation. In The Cambridge companion to John Henry Newman, ed. I. Ker and T. Merrigan, 47–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merrigan, T., and I. Ker (eds.). 2002. Newman and the word, Louvain theological and pastoral monographs. Louvain: Peeters Press/William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Merrigan, T., and I. Ker (eds.). 2008. Newman and truth, Louvain theological and pastoral monographs. Louvain: Peeters Press/William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Miller, E.J. 1987. John Henry Newman on the idea of church. Shepherdstown: The Patmos Press.
Miller, A.H. 2008. The burdens of perfection. On ethics and reading in nineteenth-century British literature. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Miller, A.B. 2010. The reasonableness of faith and assent in Newman’s Parochial and Plain Sermons and the Grammar of Assent. Newman Studies Journal 7(2): 41–54.
Mongrain, K. 2009. The eyes of faith: Newman’s critique of arguments from design. Newman Studies Journal 6(1): 68–86.
Morgan, D. 1996. Conscience in the writings of John Henry Newman: A test case for the possibility of a distinctively Christian ethic. A doctoral dissertation at Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA.
Nabe, C. 1988. Mystery and religion. Newman’s epistemology of religion. New York: Lanham.
Nedoncelle, M. 1945. Oeuvres Philosophique de Newman. Traduction de S. Jankelvitch, Preface et notes de M. Nedoncelle. Paris: Aubier.
Newman, J. 1986. The mental philosophy of John Henry Newman. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
Norris, T.J. 1977. Newman and his theological method. A guide for the theologian today. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
O’Donoghue, N.D. 1970. Is there a Christian school? Irish Theological Quarterly 37: 3–23.
O’Donoghue, N.D. 1975. Newman and the problem of privileged access to truth. Irish Theological Quarterly 42: 241–258.
Pailin, D.A. 1969. The way to faith. An examination of Newman’s grammar of assent as a response to the search for certainty in faith. London: Epworth Press.
Pinckaers, S., and C.J. Pinto de Oliveira. 1986. Universalité et permanence des Lois Morales. Fribourg: Editions du Cerf Paris.
Pojman, L.P. 1986. Religious belief and the will. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Rahner, K. 1963. The dignity and freedom of man. In Theological investigations, vol. II, 235–263. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.
Roberts, N.K. 2007. Newman on the argument from design. New Blackfriars 88: 56–66.
Rosenberg, R.S. 2007. Newman on the relationship between natural and revealed religion: His university sermons and the grammar of assent. Newman Studies Journal 4(1): 55–68.
Rule, P.C. 2004. Coleridge and Newman: The centrality of conscience. New York: Fordham University Press.
Rupert, J. 2010. John Henry Newman on the nature of the mind: Reason in religion, science, and the humanities. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
Schüller, B. 1986. Wholly human. Essays on the theory and language of morality. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Short, E. 2006. Gladstone and Newman. Newman Studies Journal 3(1): 45–59.
Sillem, E.J. 1964. Cardinal Newman’s ‘grammar of assent’ on conscience as a way to God. The Heythrop Journal V: 377–401.
Sillem, E.J. 1969–1970. The philosophical notebook, ed. E.J. Sillem, vol. 1: General introduction to the study of Newman’s philosophy, vol. 11: The text. Louvain: Nauwelaerts Publ. House.
Surlis, P. 1971. Rahner and Lonergan on method in theology. Irish Theological Quarterly 38: 187–201.
Tillman, M.K. 2008. ‘A rhetoric in conduct’: The gentleman of the university and the gentleman of the oratory. Newman Studies Journal 5(2): 6–25.
Tollefsen, O. 1987. Crosby on the origin of the prescriptive force of moral obligation. New Scholasticism 61(autumn): 462–476.
Walgrave, J.H. 1960. Newman. The theologian. The nature of belief and doctrine as exemplified in his life and works. London/New York: Chapman/Sheed and Ward.
Walgrave, J.H. 1971. Conscience du soi et conscience de Dieu. Notes sur le ‘Cahier philosophique’ de Newman. Revue Thomiste 71: 367–380.
Walgrave, J.H. 1976. La Conscience Morale et la Spécificité de la Morale Chrétienne selon J. H. Newman. Studia Moralia 14: 105–119. Also in Walgrave (1982b).
Walgrave, J.H. 1981. J. H. Newman: His personality, his principles, his fundamental doctrines: Course delivered by Professor J. H. Walgrave. Louvain: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Walgrave, J.H. 1982a. Selected writings. Thomas Aquinas, J. H. Newman, Theologia Fundamentalis, ed. G. De Schrijver and J. Kelly. Louvain: Leuven University Press.
Walgrave, J.H. 1982b. La Conscience Morale et la Spécificité de la Morale Chrétienne selon J. H. Newman. In J.H. Walgrave, Selected writings. Thomas Aquinas, J.H. Newman, Theologia Fundamentalis, ed. G. De Schrijver and J. Kelly, 203–217. Louvain: Leuven University Press.
Walgrave, J.H. 1982c. Conscience du soi et conscience de Dieu. Notes sur le ‘Cahier philosophique’ de Newman. In J.H. Walgrave, Selected writings. Thomas Aquinas, J. H. Newman, Theologia Fundamentalis, 218–231. Edited by G. De Schrijver and J. Kelly. Louvain: Leuven University Press.
Walgrave, J.H. 1986. La loi morale et la conscience selon le Cardinal Newman. In Universalité et permanence des Lois morales, ed. S. Pinckaers and C.J. Pinto de Oliveira, 163–171. Fribourg: Editions du Cerf Paris.
Weidner, H.D. 1990. The VIA MEDIA of the Anglican church. Edited with introduction and notes by H.D. Weidner. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Yearley, L.H. 1978. The ideas of Newman. Christianity and human religiosity. University Park/London: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Magill, G. (2015). Moral Conscience. In: Religious Morality in John Henry Newman. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10271-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10271-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10270-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10271-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)