Skip to main content

Linguistic Analysis of Requirements of a Space Project and Their Conformity with the Recommendations Proposed by a Controlled Natural Language

  • Conference paper
Controlled Natural Language (CNL 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8625))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The long term aim of the project carried out by the French National Space Agency (CNES) is to design a writing guide based on the real and regular writing of requirements. As a first step in the project, this paper proposes a linguistic analysis of requirements written in French by CNES engineers. The aim is to determine to what extent they conform to two rules laid down in INCOSE, a recent guide for writing requirements. Although CNES engineers are not obliged to follow any Controlled Natural Language in their writing of requirements, we believe that language regularities are likely to emerge from this task, mainly due to the writers’ experience. The issue is approached using natural language processing tools to identify sentences that do not comply with INCOSE rules. We further review these sentences to understand why the recommendations cannot (or should not) always be applied when specifying largescale projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Condamines, A.: Variations in Terminology. Application to the Management of Risks Related to Language Use in the Workplace. Terminology 16, 30–50 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nair, D.K., Somé, S.S.: A Formal Approach to Requirement Verification. In: SEDE, pp. 148–153 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barcellini, F., Albert, C., Grosse, C., Saint-Dizier, P.: Risk Analysis and Prevention: LELIE, a Tool dedicated to Procedure and Requirement Authoring. In: LREC, pp. 698–705 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sateli, B., Angius, E., Rajivelu, S.S., Witte, R.: Can Text Mining Assistants Help to Improve Requirements Specifications? In: Proceedings of the Mining Unstructured Data (MUD 2012) (2012), http://sailhome.cs.queensu.ca/mud/res/sateli-mud2012.pdf

  5. International Council on Systems Engineering: Guide for Writing Requirements (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lopez, S., Condamines, A., Josselin-Leray, A., O’Donoghue, M., Salmon, R.: Linguistic Analysis of English Phraseology and plain Language in Air-Ground Communication. Journal of Air Transport Studies 4, 44–60 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhatia, V.K.: Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Somers, H.: An Attempt to Use Weighted Cusums to Identify Sublanguages. In: Powers, D.M.W. (ed.) NeMLaP3/CoNLL 1998: New Methods in Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 131–139. ACL (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kurzon, D.: “Legal Language”: Varieties, Genres, Registers, Discourses. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7, 119–139 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Temnikova, I.: Text Complexity and Text Simplification in the Crisis Management domain, PhD thesis (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuhn, T.: A Survey and Classification of Controlled Natural Languages. Computational Linguistics 40, 121–170 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kittredge, R., Lehrberger, J.: Sublanguage: Studies of Language in Restricted Semantic Domains. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Swales, J.: Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Biber, D.: Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guespin, L.: Socioterminology Facing Problems in Standardization. In: Proceedings of TLK 1990, pp. 642–647 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pace, G.J., Rosner, M.: A Controlled Language for the Specification of Contracts. In: Fuchs, N.E. (ed.) CNL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5972, pp. 226–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Condamines, A., Rebeyrolle, J.: Searching for and Identifying Conceptual Relationships via a corpus-based approach to a Terminological Knowledge Base (CTKB): method and results. In: Bourigault, D., L’Homme, M.-C., Jacquemin, C. (eds.) Recent Advances in Computational Terminology, pp. 127–148. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Urieli, A.: Robust French syntax analysis: reconciling statistical methods and linguistic knowledge in the Talismane toolkit, PhD thesis (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paumier, S.: Unitex, http://www-igm.univ-mlv.fr/~unitex/

  20. Clark, P., Murray, W.R., Harrison, P., Thompson, J.: Naturalness vs. Predictability: A Key Debate in Controlled Languages. In: Fuchs, N.E. (ed.) CNL 2009 Workshop. LNCS, vol. 5972, pp. 65–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wyner, A., et al.: On Controlled Natural Languages: Properties and Prospects. In: Fuchs, N.E. (ed.) CNL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5972, pp. 281–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Jakobson, R.: Linguistics and Poetics. In: Sebeok, T. (ed.) Style in Language, Cambridge, pp. 350–353 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  23. ASD: Simplified Technical English. International specification for the preparation of maintenance documentation in a controlled language (Issue 4) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bünzli, A., Höfler, S.: Controlling Ambiguities in Legislative Language. In: Rosner, M., Fuchs, N.E. (eds.) CNL 2010. LNCS, vol. 7175, pp. 21–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Fuchs, N., Schwitter, R.: Controlled English for Requirements Specifications. IEEE Computer Special Issue on Interactive Natural Language Processing (1996), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.52.8814

  26. Höfler, S.: Legislative Drafting Guidelines: How Different Are They from Controlled Language Rules for Technical Writing? In: Kuhn, T., Fuchs, N.E. (eds.) CNL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7427, pp. 138–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Brien, S.: Controlling Controlled English. An Analysis of Several Controlled Language Rule Sets. In: Proceedings of EAMT-CLAW, pp. 105–114 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vogel, C.: Law matters, syntax matters and semantics matters. Formal linguistics and Law, Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs. 212, 25–54 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Condamines, A., Warnier, M. (2014). Linguistic Analysis of Requirements of a Space Project and Their Conformity with the Recommendations Proposed by a Controlled Natural Language. In: Davis, B., Kaljurand, K., Kuhn, T. (eds) Controlled Natural Language. CNL 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8625. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10223-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10223-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10222-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10223-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics