Skip to main content

Gamification in the Enterprise: Differences from Consumer Market, Implications, and a Method to Manage Them

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gamification in Education and Business

Abstract

As Gamification extends its successful application in the consumer markets, enterprises have been experimenting with it to engage its employees, customers and partners. But applying the design principles suited for consumer markets for gamification in the enterprise could lead to failures as analyzed by research firm Gartner. The gamification in the enterprise is different from consumer markets on multiple aspects including purpose, impact of failures, user personalities, reasons for engagement etc. Each of these differences has various implications on the design of the gamification initiatives. In this chapter the authors present a tested framework of understanding the differences and their implications together with a step-by-step by to manage them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of Online Environments. http://mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm.

  • Behavior Model. (2012). Retrieved May 18, 2012, from http://www.behaviormodel.org/

  • Behavior Wizard. (2012). Retrieved May 18, 2012, from http://www.behaviorwizard.org/wp/

  • Charsky, D. (2010). From edutainment to serious games: A change in the use of game characteristics. Games and Culture, 5(2), 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. (2001). Influence, science and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., & Toth, J. A. (2004). Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. CHI 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. MindTrek’11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Nacke, L. E., O’Hara, K., & Sicart, M, (2011). Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts. CHI 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1994). Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 968–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frang, K., & Mellstrand, R. (2012). Enterprise gamification of the employee development process at an infocom consultancy company. Lund, Sweden: Lunds Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y. C. (2011). The game of life: Designing a gamification system to increase current volunteer participation and retention in volunteer-based nonprofit organizations. San Antonio, TX: Trinity University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Game Mechanics. (2012). Retrieved May 18, 2012, from http://gamification.org/wiki/Game_Mechanics

  • Gartner. (2013). Retrieved July 31, 2013, from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2251015

  • Gnauk, B., Dannecker L., & Hahmann M. (2012). Leveraging gamification in demand dispatch systems. EnDM 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mento, A. J., Cartledge, N. D., & Locke, E. A. (1980). Another look at the relationship of expectancy and goal difficulty to task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, l49–l440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 938–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, N. (2007). Motivations of play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 772–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basanth Kumar Neeli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neeli, B.K. (2015). Gamification in the Enterprise: Differences from Consumer Market, Implications, and a Method to Manage Them. In: Reiners, T., Wood, L. (eds) Gamification in Education and Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics