Skip to main content

The Development and Assessment of a Team-Based Management Game

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gamification in Education and Business

Abstract

Educational games and simulations are increasingly becoming a feature of business and management training. These are often team-based, conducted in a seminar room and simulate a business project or operation. However a number of questions need to be answered. Are these games effective in achieving the goals for which they are intended, that is to enhance participants’ knowledge and soft skills? Can games of this genre be developed in a cost-effective way? Are they being designed in accordance with research-driven recommendations and best educational practices to achieve maximum effect? The particular genre of game examined in this study is referred to as Team Based Mixed Reality (TBMR) games, as these games involve a blend of live interactions and social discussion but are also computer-assisted, i.e. with digital game elements. Mixed reality blends physical and digital interactions. Team Based refers to the focus upon social interactions in the game play activities. This chapter describes the process of designing and constructing a game of that genre and measuring its effectiveness through a series of game trials using a sample (n = 101) of participants. Initial investigations are conducted into similar games currently used in Higher Education (HE) and a review of recent literature on game design and assessment leads to the hypothesis that there are ways of constructing a more effective business game, drawing on learning theory and good practice in game design, which leading to improved knowledge and decision-taking skills. The concepts and design features incorporated in the new game are then described, along with the procedures used in its development and the subsequent pre-and post testing for measured improvement in knowledge and soft skills. A number of factors are considered which can determine success in game design, notably alignment to the learning objectives, motivation, challenge, goal-setting, collaboration, competition and feedback. With due attention to these elements a game was developed to simulate a complete business operation, during which competing teams make a series of strategic and tactical decisions. The strategic issues are product pricing, expansion and funding of new facilities, whilst tactical opportunities relate to the hiring of key staff, product promotion, choice of suppliers, quality and outsourcing of parts and labour. Following a pilot with postgraduate students in an HE institution, a series of trials were conducted in the same institution with undergraduate classes taking a second year business-related module. Six classes, two of which comprised Chinese students, were asked to participate in game sessions while five classes were used as a control group. Identical pre- and post-tests were given in both cases. Scores from test questions, after adjusting for control scores, relating to factual knowledge indicated no significant improvement in real knowledge (n = 101, mean improvement 4.04 % p = 0.13). Corresponding results, however, from test questions relating to decisions-taking (what would you do if …?) showed a significant improvement in mean scores (n = 101, mean improvement 11.73 %, p = 0.005). Additionally, in a five-question survey, participants themselves rated the game experience highly against these two criteria and also for motivation, entertainment and in comparison to a conventional lesson. However both test and perception ratings for the two classes of Chinese students were significantly lower than those for Non-Chinese classes, which may be explained by language or cultural background.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, P. H., & Lawton, L. (2009). Business simulations and cognitive learning: Developments, desires, and future directions. Simulation and Gaming, 40(2), 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnab, S., Brown, K., Clarke, S., Dunwell, I., Lim, T., Suttie, N., et al. (2013). The development approach of a pedagogically-driven serious game to support relationship and sex education (RSE) within a classroom setting. Computer and Education, 69, 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belbin, R. M. (1981). Managing teams: Why they succeed or fail. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin, R. M. (1993). Team roles at work. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boocock, S. S. (1994). Johns Hopkins games program. Simulation & Gaming, 25(2), 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brian, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. J., Markulis, P. M., & Strang, D. R. (1988). Where are we? An analysis of the methods and focus of the research on simulation gaming. Simulation and Gaming, 19, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Dun, H. B. L., Phuah, P. S. K., & Lam, D. Z. Y. (2006). Enjoyment or engagement? Role of social interaction in playing massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGS). In R. Harper, M. Rauterberg, & M. Combetto (Eds.), Entertainment computing—ICEC 2006: 5th international conference (pp. 262–267). Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, S., Hainey, T., & Connolly, T. (2006). Evaluating games-based learning. Hershey PA: IGI-Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers and Education, 46, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Magoulas, G., & Poulovassilis, A. (2009). Developing an evaluation model for immersive learning experiences in a virtual world. 2009 Conference in games and virtual worlds for serious applications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, J. V., Haynes, L. L., Lucassen, B. A., & Casey, M. S. (2002). Forty simple computer games and what they could mean to educators. Simulation and Gaming, 33(2), 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denholm, J. A. (2007). Investment by simulation. Journal of Management Studies, 6(2), 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denholm, J. A., Protopsaltis, A., & de Freitas, S. (2013). Team-based mixed-reality (TMBR) games in higher education. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 3(1), 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eseryel, D., Guo, Y., & Law, V. (2012). Assessment in game based learning, foundations, innovations, and perspectives (p. 257). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson, M., Close, P., Hillson, D., & Ward, S. (2008). Prioritising project risks: A short guide to useful techniques. Princes Risborough, England: Association of Project Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (1984). Use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In K. E. Shaw (Ed.), Aspect of educational technology XVII: Staff development and career updating. New York: Nichols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiili, R. (2007). Foundation for problem-based gaming. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 394–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Fennessey, G., Colman, J., Edwards, K., & Kidder, S. (1973). The Hopkins game program: Final report on seven years of research (Report No 155). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University, Centre for Social Organization of Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, I., & de Jong, M. (2004). Combining GDSS and gaming for decision support. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 3. ABI/INFORM Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard, N., & Britton, R. (2007). Calling time: An effective and affective evaluation of two versions of the MIT beer game. BCS, Vol 2 Proceedings of the 21st BCS Group Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Wildman, J. L., & Piccolo, R. (2009). Using simulation-based training to enhance management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(4), 559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. (1992). Test-taking dispositions: A missing link? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 629–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, P. G., & McCreery, M. (2012). Are all games the same? Assessment in game-based learning, ifenthaler et al. In Dirk Ifenthaler, Deniz Eseryel & Xun Ge (Ed.), Springer, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwan, S. (2006). Game based learning. Retrieved from www.e-teaching.org

  • Smith, P., & Ragan, T. (1999). Instructional design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundre, D. L., & Wise, S. L. (2003). ‘Motivation filtering’: An exploration of the impact of low examinee motivation on the psychometric quality of tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, P., & Weth, P. (2005). Gameflow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 3(3), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, M. (2005). Assessment—Summative and formative—Some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (2008). Concept and principles of experiential learning activities. MTA International, 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Denholm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Denholm, J., Dunwell, I., de Freitas, S. (2015). The Development and Assessment of a Team-Based Management Game. In: Reiners, T., Wood, L. (eds) Gamification in Education and Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics