Skip to main content

On Universality and Formality in 19th Century Symbolic Logic: The Case of Schröder’s “Absolute Algebra”

  • Chapter
The Road to Universal Logic

Part of the book series: Studies in Universal Logic ((SUL))

  • 1009 Accesses

Abstract

This paper deals with conceptions of formality underlying 19th century symbolic logic, where notations and manipulation of signs played an important role. It is devoted specifically to the case of Ernst Schröder’s “formal algebra”, which extended with the algebra of relatives (as developed by C.S. Peirce) constituted the basis for a Pasigraphy as a universal notation system. The discussion will begin with the well-known distinction devised by Gottlob Frege between two sorts of formal theories. In the paper, both conceptions of formality will be connected with the corresponding attempts of constructing universal scientific notations (Schröder’s Pasigraphy and Frege’s Begriffsschrift). It will be shown that the Pasigraphy was an interpretation of that formal algebra. As a further conclusion, it will be suggested that each of the two conceptions of formality places logic in different levels and determines different conceptions of universality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thommae, together with Heinrich Eduard Heine and Hermann Hankel among others, would represent the school of “old formalism”, different from the later formalism of Hilbert’s school.

  2. 2.

    Ignacio Angelelli called this view “philosophical logicism”: Arithmetic would deal with the more general features of reality, that is, these features that are in every domain. In this sense it could be compared with ontology or logic (see [1, p. 244]).

  3. 3.

    In fact, Frege mainly refers to Alwin R. Korselt and his paper “Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie” (see [7, p. 281]). Korselt had worked on Schröder’s algebra of logic.

  4. 4.

    This is essentially what Detlefsen called “Frege’s Problem” (see [3, pp. 9 ff]).

  5. 5.

    In the Pasigraphy-paper, the algebra of relatives has a privileged interpretation in set theory and Schröder proposed a set-theoretic reconstruction of arithmetic. Therefore, it can be suggested that the formal algebra has an intended interpretation, being then a language in a strict sense. However, the distinction between formal system and possible interpretations remains. For a further discussion of this problem, see [13, pp. 597 ff].

  6. 6.

    Thommae also referred to “schemes” in his aforementioned book: real numbers should be understood as “pure schemes without content”.

  7. 7.

    Frege made use of the notion of schema in his criticism on Korselt’s idea of formal system (see [7, p. 304]).

References

  1. Angelelli, I.: Studies on Gottlob Frege and Traditional Philosophy. Dordrecht, Reidel (1967)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Corcoran, J.: Schemata: the concept of schema in the history of logic. Bull. Symb. Log. 12, 219–240 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Detlefsen, M.: Hilbert’s Program. An Essay on Mathematical Instrumentalism. Dordrecht, Reidel (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dutilh Novaes, C.: The different ways in which logic is (said to be) formal. Hist. Philos. Logic 32, 303–332 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Frege, G.: Über formale Theorien der Arithmetik. Sitz.ber. Jeaneischen Ges. Med. Nat.wiss. 12, 94–104 (1885/1886). Reprinted in Frege G.: Kleine Schriften, 2nd edn. (1990) Edited by Ignacio Angelelli. Olms, Hildesheim–Zürich–New York, Olms, pp. 103–111

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frege, G.: Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, vol II. Jena (1903). Reprinted Hildesheim, Olms, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frege, G.: Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie. Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.-Ver. 15, 293–309 (1906). Reprinted in Frege 1990, pp. 281–323

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hodges, W.: A formality. CD Festschrift for the 50th birthday of Johan van Benthem, Vossiuspers AUP (1999). www.aup.nl

  9. Kant, I.: KrV. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 1st edn. 1781, 2nd edn. 1787. In: Weischedel, W. (ed.) Werke in zwölf Bänden, vol. III. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Legris, J.: Deux approches des relations logique-mathématiques Frege et Schröder. In: En Justifier en Mathématiques, comp. por Dominique Flament y Philippe Nabonnand, pp. 215–254. Editions de la Maison des sciences de l´homme, Paris (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Legris, J.: Universale Sprache und Grundlagen der Mathematik bei Ernst Schröder. In: Mathematik—Logik—Philosophie. Ideen und ihre historischen Wechselwirkungen, comp. por Günther Löffladt. pp. 255–269. Harri Deutsch, Frankfurt am Main (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. MacFarlane, J.: What does it mean to say that logic is formal? PhD Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peckhaus, V.: Schröder’s logic. In: Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 3. The Rise of Modern Logic: From Leibniz to Frege, pp. 557–609. Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schröder, E.: Lehrbuch der Arithmetik und Algebra. Teubner, Lepizig (1873)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Schröder, E.: Review of Begriffsschrift by Gottlob Frege. Z. Math. Phys. 25, 81–94 (1880)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schröder, E.: Über Pasigraphie, ihren gegenwärtige Stand und die pasigraphische Bewegung in Italien. In: Rudio, F. (ed.) Verhandlungen der Ersten Internationales Mathematiker-Kongresses in Zürich vom 9. bis 11. August 1897. The Monist, vol. 9, pp. 147–162. Teubner, Leipzig (1898). Reprint Nendeln, Kraus, 1967, English translation: on Pasigraphy. Its Present State and The Pasigraphic Movement in Italy en The monist 9, 1898, pp. 44–62 (corrigenda, p. 320)

    Google Scholar 

  17. van Heijenoort: Logic as calculus and logic as language. Synthese 24, 324–330 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

It is a truism that the idea of universality is essential to Jean-Yves Beziau’s work. In some respect, Jean-Yves devotes his life to this idea. The following historical comments can be interesting in connection with it. This paper is a result of a research project supported by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas from Argentina (PIP 11220080101334, CONICET). It also benefited from the additional financial support of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. I wish to thank Volker Peckhaus for helpful and valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Legris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Legris, J. (2015). On Universality and Formality in 19th Century Symbolic Logic: The Case of Schröder’s “Absolute Algebra”. In: Koslow, A., Buchsbaum, A. (eds) The Road to Universal Logic. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10193-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics