Advertisement

Presence: Form, Content and Consciousness

  • John A. WaterworthEmail author
  • Eva Lindh Waterworth
  • Giuseppe Riva
  • Fabrizia Mantovani

Abstract

In this chapter we present a rather wide-ranging perspective on presence as a central, characterizing feature of conscious mental life. After clarifying what we mean by presence in the first section, Sect. 3.2 discusses the implications of this for measurement. In Sect. 3.3, we consider the importance of media form for the sense of presence, before moving on in Sect. 3.4 to the relationship between presence and the sense of self considered in evolutionary terms. Section 3.5 deals specifically with attention, viewing presence as a reflection of attentional focus. Our aim is to convey the big picture about presence: what it is, what it’s for, how it evolved, what it is determined by and the effects it can have.

Keywords

Evolution Consciousness Embodiment Self Psychology Psychotherapy Synesthesia Measurement Action Brain Imagination Imagery Form Content Attention 

References

  1. Allport, D. A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioural and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Guerrero, B., Liaño, V., Alcañiz, M., & Rey, B. (2005). The third pole of the sense of presence: Comparing virtual and imagery spaces. PsychNology, 3(1), 90–100.Google Scholar
  4. Bartolomeo, P. (2002). The relationship between visual perception and visual mental imagery: A reappraisal of the neuropsychological evidence. Cortex, 38, 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biocca, F. (1992). Communication within virtual reality: Creating a space for research. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biocca, F. (2003, May 7). Can we resolve the book, the physical reality, and the dream state problems? A three pole model of presence. Presentation at EU presence research conference, Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
  7. Biocca, F., Kim, J., & Choi, Y. (2001). Visual touch in virtual environments: An exploratory study of presence, multimodal interfaces, and cross-modal sensory illusions. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual environments, 10(3), 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brett, J. F., & eWalle, D. V. (1999). Goal orientation and goal content as predictors of performance in a training program. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(6), 863–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  10. Cropanzano, R., James, K., & Citera, M. (1994). A goal hierarchy model of personality, motivation and leadership. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 267–322.Google Scholar
  11. Cytowic, R. (1989). Synaesthesia. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Damasio, A. (1994). Decartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Penguin Putnam.Google Scholar
  13. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. San Diego: Harcourt Brace and Co, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Dolan, R. J. (1999). Feeling the neurobiological self. Nature, 401, 847–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  16. Flaherty, M. G. (1999). A watched pot: How we experience time. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Floridi, L. (2004, October 13–15). Exploring the informational nature of presence. Opening invited keynote address at 7th annual international workshop on presence 2004. Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., Pearson, D. E., Meddis, R., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2000). Using behavioural realism to estimate presence: A study of the utility of postural responses to motion-stimuli. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(2), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman, J., Lessiter, J., Keogh, E., Bond, F. W., & Chapman, K. (2004). Relaxation island: Virtual, and really relaxing. In Proceedings of presence 2004, Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, J., Lessiter, J., Pugh, K. & Keogh, E. (2005). When presence and emotion are related, and when they are not. In Proceedings of presence 2005, London, UK.Google Scholar
  21. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gregory, R. L. (1998). Eye and brain: The psychology of seeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Heeter, C. (2003). Reflections on real presence by a virtual person. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(4), 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Humphrey, N. (1992). A history of the mind. New York: Simon and Shuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Janoff-Bulman, R., & Frantz, C. M. (1997). The impact of trauma on meaning: From meaningless world to meaningful life. In M. Power & C. R. Brewin (Eds.), The transformation of meaning in psychological therapies (pp. 91–106). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, M. T. (2007, October 25–27). Presence as external versus internal experience: How form, user, style, and content factors produce presence from the Inside. In Proceedings of presence 2007, 10th annual international workshop on presence, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  27. Kåver, A., & Nilsonne, Å. (2002). Dialektisk beteendeterapi vid emotionellt instabil personlighetsstörining – Teori, strategi och teknik. Sweden: Natur och Kultur (in Swedish only).Google Scholar
  28. Laarni, J., Ravaja, N., Saari, T. & Hartmann, T. (2004, October). Personality-related differences in subjective presence. In Proceedings of presence 2004. Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
  29. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Lee S., Gerard G. J., Rizzo, A., & Park, H.(2004, October). Formation of spatial presence: By form or content? In Proceedings of Presence 2004. Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
  31. Lombard, M. & Ditton, T. (1997). Presence: At the heart of it all. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2).Google Scholar
  32. Loomis, J. M. (1992). Distal attribution and presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 113–119.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. Metzinger, T. (1999). The hint half guessed. Scientific American, 11, 184–189.Google Scholar
  34. Mikropoulos, T. A., Tzimas, E. & Dimou, G. L. (2004, October). Objective presence measures through electric brain activity. In Proceedings of Presence 2004. Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
  35. Ohayon, M. M., Zulley, J., Guilleminault, C., & Smirne, S. (1999). Prevalence and pathologic associations of sleep paralysis in the general population. Neurology, 52, 1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  37. Ramachandran, V. S., & Blakeslee, S. (1998). Phantoms in the brain. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  38. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia – A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
  39. Regenbrecht, H., Schubert, T., & Friedmann, F. (1998). Measuring the sense of presence and its relations to fear of heights in virtual environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10(3), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Riva, G. & Waterworth, J. A. (2003). Presence and the self: A cognitive neuroscience approach. Presence-Connect, 3(3), posted 7 April 2003.Google Scholar
  41. Riva, G., Wiederhold, B., & Molinari, E. (Eds.). (1999). Virtual environments in clinical psychology and neuroscience. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  42. Riva, G., Waterworth, J. A., & Waterworth, E. L. (2004). The layers of presence: A bio-cultural approach to understanding presence in natural and mediated environments. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(4), 402–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Waterworth, E. L., & Waterworth, J. A. (2015). Intention, action, self and other: An evolutionary model of presence. In M. Lombard, F. Biocca, J. Freeman, W. IJsselsteijn, & R. J. Schaevitz (Eds.), Immersed in media: Telepresence theory, measurement & technology (pp. 73–99). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Roche, M. S., & McConkey, K. M. (1990). Absorption: Nature, assessment and correlates. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 59(1), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sas, C., & O’Hare, G. M. P. (2003). Presence equation: An investigation into cognitive factors underlying presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 523–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schier, M. A. (2000). Changes in EEG alpha power during simulated driving: a demonstration. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 37, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Slater, M. (2002). Presence and the sixth sense. Presence: Teleoperators, and Virtual Environments, 11(4), 435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Slater, M. (2003). A note on presence terminology. Presence-Connect, 3(3).Google Scholar
  49. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  51. Usoh M., Arthur K., Whitton M., Bastos R., Steed A., Brooks F., & Slater M. (1999). The visual cliff revisited: A virtual presence study on locomotion. In 2nd international workshop on presence, April 6–7, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.Google Scholar
  52. Velmans, M. (2000). Understanding consciousness. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waterworth, J. A. (1984). The influence of variations in cognitive processing on the perception of time. PhD thesis, University of Hertfordshire, UK. Available through the British Lending Library (Accession no. D50267/84).Google Scholar
  54. Waterworth, J. A. (1996, November). VR for animals. In Proceedings of ciber@RT’96, Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
  55. Waterworth, J. A. (1997). Creativity and sensation: The case for synaesthetic media. Leonardo, 30(4), 327–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Waterworth, J. A. & Fällman, D. (2003, September). The reality helmet: Transforming the experience of being-in-the-world. In Part 2 of Proceedings of HCI 2003, Bath, UK.Google Scholar
  57. Waterworth, E. L. & Waterworth J. A. (2000a, March). Using a telescope in a cave: Presence and absence in educational VR. Presented at Presence 2000: Third international workshop on presence, Delft, Holland.Google Scholar
  58. Waterworth, E. L., & Waterworth, J. A. (2000b). Presence and absence in educational VR: The role of perceptual seduction in conceptual learning. Themes in Education, 1(1), 7–38.Google Scholar
  59. Waterworth, E. L., & Waterworth, J. A. (2001). Focus, locus and sensus: The 3 dimensions of virtual experience. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 4(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Waterworth, J. A., & Waterworth, E. L. (2003a). Being and time: Judged presence and duration as a function of media form. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Waterworth, J. A. & Waterworth, E. L. (2003b). The meaning of presence. Presence-Connect, 3(3), posted 13 February 2003.Google Scholar
  62. Waterworth, J. A., & Waterworth, E. L. (2006). Presence as a dimension of communication: Context of use and the person. In G. Riva, M. T. Anguera, B. K. Wiederhold, & F. Mantovani (Eds.), From communication to presence: Cognition, emotions and culture towards the ultimate communicative experience (Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  63. Waterworth, J. A., Waterworth, E. L. & Westling, J. (2002, October 9–11). Presence as performance: The mystique of digital participation. In Proceedings of presence 2002. Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  64. Waterworth, J. A., Lund, A., & Modjeska, D. (2003a). Experiential design of shared information spaces. In K. Höök, D. Benyon, & A. Munro (Eds.), Designing information spaces: The social navigation approach. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  65. Waterworth, E. L., Häggkvist, M., Jalkanen, K., Olsson, S., Waterworth, J. A., & Wimelius, H. (2003b). The exploratorium: An environment to explore your feelings. Psychnology, 1(3), 189–201.Google Scholar
  66. Waterworth, J. A., Waterworth, E. L., Mantovani, F., & Riva, G. (2010). On feeling (the) present: An evolutionary account of the sense of presence in physical and electronically-mediated environments. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(1–2), 167–189.Google Scholar
  67. White, B. W. (1970). Perceptual findings with the vision-substitution system. IEEE Transactions on Man-machine Systems, MMS, 11, 54–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Waterworth
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eva Lindh Waterworth
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Riva
    • 2
    • 3
  • Fabrizia Mantovani
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab. – ATN-P Lab.Istituto Auxologico ItalianoMilanItaly
  3. 3.Communication and Ergonomics of NEw Technologies Lab. – ICE NET Lab.Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly
  4. 4.Centre for Studies in Communication SciencesUniversity of Milan-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations