Advertisement

Effects of Evolutionary Rules on Cooperative Tendencies in Franchising Networks

  • Thomas Ehrmann
  • Brinja Meiseberg
  • Michael Kopel
Chapter

Abstract

We develop a conceptual framework that integrates concepts from evolutionary (game) theory and from cultural anthropology to study how cooperation emerges and persists within organizational contexts. In particular, we argue the case for three rules that govern the evolution of cooperation—kinship selection, direct reciprocity, and indirect reciprocity. We apply these rules to a cooperative arrangement that displays particularly interesting features as regards its entrepreneurial members’ tendencies towards choosing cooperative vs. defective, or “free-riding”, behavior: to the franchise form of organization. We further argue that social learning and cultural transmission mechanisms support these three rules of cooperation, so that cooperation can evolve and remain stable even in noisy and large group environments. The model helps organizations understand factors that affect cooperative tendencies among its network members, and provides direction on how to foster, promote, and fine-tune a cooperative climate in the network—initially, as well as in the long run. Accordingly, we develop specific propositions concerning the evolution of inter-firm cooperation within the franchised type of business.

Keywords

Social Learning Payoff Matrix Replicator Dynamic Evolutionary Stable Strategy Cultural Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aarstad J, Haugland SA, Greve A (2010) Performance spillover effects in entrepreneurial networks: assessing a dyadic theory of social capital. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 34(5):1003–1019Google Scholar
  2. Abreu D, Milgrom P, Pearce D (1991) Information and timing in repeated partnerships. Econometrica 59:1713–1733Google Scholar
  3. Afuah A (2000) How much do your co-opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Manage J 21:387–404Google Scholar
  4. Arce DG (2006) Taking corporate culture seriously: group effects in the trust game. Southern Econ J 73(1):27–36Google Scholar
  5. Arend RJ, Seale DA (2005) Modeling alliance activity: an iterated prisoners’ dilemma with exit option. Strategic Manage J 26:1057–1074Google Scholar
  6. Argote L, Darr E (2001) Repositories of knowledge in franchise organizations. In: Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG (eds) The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 51–59Google Scholar
  7. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  8. Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396Google Scholar
  9. Bischi GI, Dawid H, Kopel M (2003a) Spillover effects and the evolution of firm clusters. J Econ Behav Organ 50:47–75Google Scholar
  10. Bischi GI, Dawid H, Kopel M (2003b) Gaining the competitive edge using internal and external spillovers: a dynamic analysis. J Econ Dyn Control 27:2171–2193Google Scholar
  11. Borgatti ST, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Manage Sci 49:432–445Google Scholar
  12. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1989) The evolution of indirect reciprocity. Soc Networks 11:213–236Google Scholar
  13. Bradach J (1998) Franchise organizations. Harvard Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Burt RS (2000) Decay functions. Soc Networks 22:1–28Google Scholar
  15. Byrne D (1969) Attitudes and attraction. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 35–89Google Scholar
  16. Cable DM, Shane S (1997) A prisoner’s dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Acad Manage Rev 22:142–176Google Scholar
  17. Chen W, Tan J (2009) Understanding transnational entrepreneurship through a network lens: theoretical and methodological considerations. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 33(5):1079–1091Google Scholar
  18. Chung SA, Singh H, Lee K (2000) Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Manage J 21:1–22Google Scholar
  19. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152Google Scholar
  20. Cohen MD, Riolo RL, Axelrod R (2001) The role of social structure in the maintenance of cooperative regimes. Ration Soc 13(1):5–32Google Scholar
  21. Contractor NS, Wasserman S, Faust K (2006) Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks. Acad Manage Rev 31:681–703Google Scholar
  22. Cordes C, Richerson PJ, McElreath R, Strimling P (2008) A naturalistic approach to the theory of the firm: the role of cooperation and cultural evolution. J Econ Behav Organ 68(1):125–139Google Scholar
  23. Cowan R, Jonard N, Zimmermann JB (2007) Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks. Manage Sci 53:1051–1067Google Scholar
  24. Dant RP (2008) A futuristic research agenda for the field of franchising. J Small Bus Manage 46:91–98Google Scholar
  25. Dant RP, Nasr N (1998) Control techniques and upward flow of information in franchising in distant markets: conceptualization and preliminary evidence. J Bus Venturing 13:3–28Google Scholar
  26. Dant RP, Perrigot R, Cliquet G (2008) A cross-cultural comparison of the plural form in franchise networks: United States, France, and Brazil. J Small Bus Manage 46:286–311Google Scholar
  27. Darr ED, Kurtzberg TR (2000) An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82:28–44Google Scholar
  28. Das T, Teng BS (2000) A ressource-based theory of strategic alliances. J Manage 26:31–61Google Scholar
  29. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Durett R, Levin SL (2005) Can stable social groups be maintained by homophilous imitation alone? J Econ Behav Organ 57:267–286Google Scholar
  31. Dyer J, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manage Rev 23:660–679Google Scholar
  32. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manage Rev 14:57–74Google Scholar
  33. Fehr E, Fischbacher U, Gächter S (2002) Strong reciprocity, human cooperation and the enforcement of social norms. Hum Nat 13:1–25Google Scholar
  34. Fletcher JA, Zwick M (2007) The evolution of altruism: game theory in multilevel selection and inclusive fitness. J Theor Biol 245:26–36Google Scholar
  35. Friedman D (1991) Evolutionary games in economics. Econometrica 59:637–666Google Scholar
  36. Friedman D (1998) On economic applications of evolutionary game theory. J Evol Econ 8:15–43Google Scholar
  37. Gintis H (2000) Strong reciprocity and human sociality. J Theor Biol 206:169–179Google Scholar
  38. Gintis H (2004) The genetic side of gene-culture evolution: internalization of norms and prosocial emotions. J Econ Behav Organ 53:57–67Google Scholar
  39. Gintis H, Smith EA, Bowles S (2001) Costly signaling and cooperation. J Theor Biol 213:103–119Google Scholar
  40. Greve A, Salaff JW (2003) Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 28(1):1–22Google Scholar
  41. Grünhagen M, Dorsch MJ (2003) Does the franchisor provide value to franchisees? Past, current, and future value assessments of two franchisee types. J Small Bus Manage 41:366–384Google Scholar
  42. Grünhagen M, Mittelstaedt RA (2005) Entrepreneurs or investors: do multi-unit franchisees have different philosophical orientations. J Small Bus Manage 43:207–225Google Scholar
  43. Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Manage J 19:293–317Google Scholar
  44. Gulati R (2000) Strategic networks. Strategic Manage J 21:203–215Google Scholar
  45. Guzmán RA, Rodríguez-Sickert C, Rowthorn R (2007) When in Rome, do as the Romans do: the coevolution of altruistic punishment, conformist learning, and cooperation. Evol Hum Behav 28:112–117Google Scholar
  46. Hanaki N, Peterhansl A, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2007) Cooperation in evolving social networks. Manage Sci 53:1036–1050Google Scholar
  47. Henrich J (2004) Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. J Econ Behav Organ 53:3–35Google Scholar
  48. Henrich J, Boyd R (1998) The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evol Hum Behav 19:215–241Google Scholar
  49. Henrich J, Boyd R (2001) Why people punish defectors – weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. J Theor Biol 208:79–89Google Scholar
  50. Henrich J, Gil-White F (2001) The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evol Hum Behav 22:165–196Google Scholar
  51. Henrich J, Henrich N (2006) Culture, evolution, and the puzzle of human cooperation. Cogn Syst Res 7:220–245Google Scholar
  52. Hite JM (2005) Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 29(1):113–144Google Scholar
  53. Hite JM, Hesterly WS (2001) The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Manage J 22(3):275–286Google Scholar
  54. Ingram PJ, Baum JAC (2001) Interorganizational learning and the dynamics of chain relationships. In: Baum JAC (ed) Multiunit organization and multimarket strategy. Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 109–139Google Scholar
  55. International Franchise Association (2007) http://www.franchise.org. Accessed 15 Aug 2007
  56. Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Vaidyanath D (2002) Managing strategic alliances to achieve a competitive advantage. J Manage 28:413–446Google Scholar
  57. Jackson SE, Brett JF, Sessa VI, Cooper DM, Julin JA, Peyronnin K (1991) Some differences make a difference: individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. J Appl Psychol 76:675–689Google Scholar
  58. Jambulingam T, Nevin JR (1999) Influence of franchisee selection criteria on outcomes desired by the franchisor. J Bus Venturing 14:363–395Google Scholar
  59. Justis RT, Judd RJ (1989) Franchising. South-Western Publishing, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  60. Kalnins A (2004) An empirical analysis of territorial encroachment in franchised and company-owned branded chains. Market Sci 23:476–489Google Scholar
  61. Kalnins A, Mayer KJ (2004) Franchising, ownership, and experience: a study of pizza restaurant survival. Manage Sci 50:1716–1728Google Scholar
  62. Karra N, Tracey P, Phillips N (2006) Altruism and agency in the family firm: exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 30(6):861–877Google Scholar
  63. Kaufmann PJ, Rangan V (1990) A model for managing system conflict during franchise expansion. J Retailing 66:155–173Google Scholar
  64. Kim T-J, Oh H, Swaminathan A (2006) Framing interorganizational network change: a network inertia perspective. Acad Manage Rev 31(3):704–720Google Scholar
  65. Knott A (2003) The organizational routines factor matrix paradox. Strategic Manage J 24:929–943Google Scholar
  66. Kogut B (1989) The stability of joint ventures: reciprocity and competitive rivalry. J Ind Econ 38:183–198Google Scholar
  67. Koka BR, Madhavan R, Prescott JE (2006) The evolution of interfirm networks: environmental effects on patterns of network change. Acad Manage Rev 31(3):721–737Google Scholar
  68. Kreps DM (1990) Corporate culture and economic theory. In: Alt JE, Shepsle KA (eds) Perspectives on positive political theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 90–143Google Scholar
  69. Lafontaine F (1992) Agency theory and franchising: some empirical results. RAND J Econ 23:263–283Google Scholar
  70. Lane PJ, Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Manage J 19:461–477Google Scholar
  71. Larsson R, Bengtsson L, Henriksson K, Sparks J (1998) The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organ Sci 9:285–305Google Scholar
  72. Lavie D (2006) The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view. Acad Manage Rev 31:638–658Google Scholar
  73. Lee C, Lee K, Pennings JM (2001) Internal capabilities, external networks and performance: a study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Manage J 22:615–640Google Scholar
  74. Love J (1986) McDonald’s: behind the arches. Bantam, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  75. Mark NP (2002) Cultural transmission, disproportionate prior exposure, and the evolution of cooperation. Am Sociol Rev 67:323–344Google Scholar
  76. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol 27:415–444Google Scholar
  77. Mengel F (2008) Matching structure and the cultural transmission of social norms. J Econ Behav Organ 67(3–4):608–623Google Scholar
  78. Michael SC (1996) To franchise or not to franchise: an analysis of decision rights and organizational form shares. J Bus Venturing 11:57–71Google Scholar
  79. Minkler AP (1992) Why firms franchise: a search cost theory. J Inst Theor Econ 148:240–259Google Scholar
  80. Nowak MA (2006a) Evolutionary dynamics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  81. Nowak MA (2006b) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 134:1560–1563Google Scholar
  82. Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998a) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393:573–577Google Scholar
  83. Nowak MA, Sigmund K (1998b) The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. J Theor Biol 194:561–574Google Scholar
  84. Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2004) Evolutionary dynamics of biological games. Science 303:793–799Google Scholar
  85. Panchanathan K, Boyd R (2003) A tale of two defectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. J Theor Biol 224:115–126Google Scholar
  86. Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of inter-firm cooperation. Acad Manage J 4:794–829Google Scholar
  87. Parkhe A, Wasserman S, Ralston D (2006) New frontiers in network theory development. Acad Manage Rev 31(3):560–568Google Scholar
  88. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Adm Sci Q 41:116–145Google Scholar
  89. Pruitt D, Kimmel M (1977) Twenty years of experimental gaming: critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annu Rev Psychol 28:363–392Google Scholar
  90. Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Manage Sci 51:869–881Google Scholar
  91. Shane S (2001) Organizational incentives and organizational mortality. Organ Sci 12:136–160Google Scholar
  92. Shane S (2005) From ice cream to the internet: using franchising to drive the growth and profits of your company. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  93. Sheridan M, Gillespie A (1995) Hotel industry slows to confront encroachment, financing issues. National Real Estate Investor 37:64–71Google Scholar
  94. Simon HA (1990) A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. Science 250:1665–1668Google Scholar
  95. Simonin BL (1997) The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization. Acad Manage J 40:1150–1174Google Scholar
  96. Slotte-Kock S, Coviello N (2010) Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract 34(1):31–57Google Scholar
  97. Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Manage J 21:791–811Google Scholar
  98. Tatham RL, Douglas R, Bush RF (1972) An analysis of decision criteria in franchisor/franchisee selection processes. J Retailing 48:16–22Google Scholar
  99. Tsai W (2004) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad Manage J 44:998–1004Google Scholar
  100. Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q 42:35–67Google Scholar
  101. Weibull JW (1995) Evolutionary game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  102. Zaheer A, Bell GG (2005) Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Manage J 26:809–825Google Scholar
  103. Zollo M, Reuer JJ, Singh H (2005) Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ Sci 13:701–713Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Ehrmann
    • 1
  • Brinja Meiseberg
    • 1
  • Michael Kopel
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Strategic Management, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.Department of Organization and Economics of InstitutionsKarl-Franzens-UniversitätGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations