Skip to main content

A Note on the Use of Margins to Compare Distinguishers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Constructive Side-Channel Analysis and Secure Design (COSADE 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 8622))

Abstract

Relative distinguishing margins are becoming a popular measure for comparing distinguishers. This paper presents some examples that show that this measure, although informative and intuitively sound, should not be taken alone as benchmark of distinguishers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We note that the distinction between theoretical distinguishing margins and distinguishing margins is orthogonal to the observations in this paper, and the consequences affect both.

  2. 2.

    Up to a typo in the caption of Fig. 2 in [12].

References

  1. Brier, E., Clavier, C., Olivier, F.: Correlation power analysis with a leakage model. In: Joye, M., Quisquater, J.-J. (eds.) CHES 2004. LNCS, vol. 3156, pp. 16–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Gierlichs, B., Batina, L., Tuyls, P., Preneel, B.: Mutual information analysis. In: Oswald, E., Rohatgi, P. (eds.) CHES 2008. LNCS, vol. 5154, pp. 426–442. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Kocher, P.C., Jaffe, J., Jun, B.: Differential power analysis. In: Wiener, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1999. LNCS, vol. 1666, pp. 388–397. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Le, T.-H., Clédière, J., Canovas, C., Robisson, B., Servière, C., Lacoume, J.-L.: A proposition for correlation power analysis enhancement. In: Goubin, L., Matsui, M. (eds.) CHES 2006. LNCS, vol. 4249, pp. 174–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Le, T.-H., Clédière, J., Servière, C., Lacoume, J.-L.: Noise reduction in side channel attack using fourth-order cumulant. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2(4), 710–720 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maghrebi, H., Guilley, S., Rioul, O., Danger, J.-L.: Some results about the distinction of side-channel distinguishers based on distributions. In: 10th International Workshop on Cryptographic Architectures Embedded in Reconfigurable Devices (CryptArchi 2012), Saint-Etienne, France, 19–22 June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mangard, S., Oswald, E., Standaert, F.-X.: One for all - all for one: unifying standard differential power analysis attacks. IET Inf. Secur. 5(2), 100–110 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oswald, E., Mather, L., Whitnall, C.: Choosing distinguishers for differential power analysis attacks. In: Non-Invasive Attack Testing Workshop, NIST (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Standaert, F.-X., Malkin, T.G., Yung, M.: A unified framework for the analysis of side-channel key recovery attacks. In: Joux, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5479, pp. 443–461. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Standaert, F.-X., Veyrat-Charvillon, N., Oswald, E., Gierlichs, B., Medwed, M., Kasper, M., Mangard, S.: The World Is Not Enough: Another Look on Second-Order DPA. In: Abe, M. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6477, pp. 112–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Whitnall, C., Oswald, E.: A comprehensive evaluation of mutual information analysis using a fair evaluation framework. In: Rogaway, P. (ed.) CRYPTO 2011. LNCS, vol. 6841, pp. 316–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitnall, C., Oswald, E.: A fair evaluation framework for comparing side-channel distinguishers. J. Cryptogr. Eng. 1(2), 145–160 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitnall, C., Oswald, E., Mather, L.: An exploration of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test as a competitor to mutual information analysis. In: Prouff, E. (ed.) CARDIS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7079, pp. 234–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. This work was supported in part by the Research Council of KU Leuven: GOA TENSE (GOA/11/007), by the Flemish Government FWO G.0550.12N and by the Hercules Foundation AKUL/11/19. Oscar Reparaz is funded by a PhD Fellowship of the Fund for Scientific Research - Flanders (FWO). Benedikt Gierlichs is Postdoctoral Fellow of the Fund for Scientific Research - Flanders (FWO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar Reparaz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reparaz, O., Gierlichs, B., Verbauwhede, I. (2014). A Note on the Use of Margins to Compare Distinguishers. In: Prouff, E. (eds) Constructive Side-Channel Analysis and Secure Design. COSADE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8622. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10175-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10175-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10174-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10175-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics