Abstract
The aim of this paper is to test the convergence hypothesis for the EU countries with Netherlands which is considered as the benchmark. The empirical analysis uses Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in constant prices of 2005 and covers the period 1950–2010. The empirical approach complementarily employs unit root tests for stochastic convergence and a test proposed by Tomljanovich and Vogelsang (Empirical Econ 27: 49–62, 2002) and Nieswiadomy and Strazicich (Econ Inq 42: 323–340, 2004) that is based on Carlino and Mills’ (J Monet Econ 32: 335–346, 1993) methodology. Applying the unit root tests for the relative per capita real GDP series for each country, we are able to reject the unit root hypothesis for 6 out of 14 countries. However, our results suggest there is stronger evidence in favor of convergence when we account for one or two endogenous structural breaks in the intercept and slope of the trend function. Based on Carlino and Mills methodology, we found strong evidence of a catch-up process until the mid-1980 towards the Netherlands for all countries except for the UK, although, after 1985, it is clear that the economies show different behavior which is probably associated with differences in the growth process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Perron considered three break models as follows: The “crash” Model A allows for a one-time change in level; the “changing growth” Model B considers a sudden change in slope of the trend function; and Model C allows for change in level and trend. Model B is omitted from this study, as it is commonly held that most economies time series can be described adequately by Model A or C (Lee and Strazicich 1999).
- 3.
According to Dawson and Sen (2007) two coefficients insignificantly different from zero indicate absolute convergence. Also, an intercept significantly different from zero with a trend that is not, implies steady state.
References
Banerjee A, Lumsdaine RI, Stock JH (1992) Recursive and sequential tests of the and trend-break. Hypothesis: theory and international evidence. J Bus Econ Stat 10:271–287
Barro RJ (1991) Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Q J Econ 106:407–443
Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100(2):223–251
Baumol W (1986) Productivity growth, convergence and welfare. Am Econ Rev 76:1072–1085
Beliu S, Higgins ML (2004) Fractional cointegration analysis of EU convergence. Appl Econ 36:1607–1611
Bernard A (1991) Empirical implications of the convergence hypothesis. Working paper, Center for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University
Bernard A, Durlauf S (1991) Convergence of international output movements. NBER working paper 3717
Bernard A, Durlauf S (1995) Convergence in international output. J Appl Econ 10:97–108
Bernard A, Durlauf S (1996) Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. J Econom 71(1–2):161–173
Borsi TM, Metiu N (2013) The evolution of economic convergence in the European Union. Discussion paper, Deutsche Bundesbank
Brada J, Kutan A, Zhou S (2005) Real and monetary convergence between the European Union’s core and recent member countries: a rolling cointegration approach. J Bank Finance 29:249–270
Campbell JY, Mankiw NG (1989) International evidence on the persistence of economic fluctuations. J Monet Econ 23:319–333
Carlino G, Mills L (1993) Are U.S. regional incomes converging? A time series analysis. J Monet Econ 32:335–346
Christiano LJ (1992) Searching for breaks in GNP. J Bus Econ Stat 10:237–250
Cogley T (1990) International evidence on the size of the random walk in output. J Polit Econ 98:501–518
Cunado J, Gil-Alana LA, De Gracia FP (2003) Empirical evidence on real convergence in some OECD countries. Appl Econ Lett 10:173–176
Cunado J, Gil-Alana LA, Perez de Gracia F (2006) Empirical evidence on real convergence in some OECD countries. Appl Econ Lett 10:173–176
Dawson J, Sen A (2007) New evidence on the convergence of international income from a group of 29 countries. Empirical Econ 33:199–230
De Long JB (1988) Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: comment. Am Econ Rev 78:1138–1154
Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimates for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431
Evans P (1998) Using panel data to evaluate growth theories. Int Econ Rev 39:295–306
Evans P, Karras G (1996) Convergence revisited. J Monet Econ 37:249–265
Grier KB, Tullock G (1989) An empirical analysis of cross-national economic growth, 1951–1980. J Monet Econ 24:259–276
Guetat I, Serranito F (2007) Income convergence within the MENA countries: a panel unit root approach. Q Rev Econ Finance, Elsevier 46(5):685–706
Kutan A, Yigit T (2005) Real and nominal stochastic convergence: are the new EU members ready to join the Euro zone? J Comp Econ 33:387–400
Lee J, Strazicich M (1999) Minimum LM unit root test. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Central Florida
Lee J, Strazicich M (2001) Break point estimation and spurious rejections with endogenous unit root tests. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 63(5):535–558
Lee J, Strazicich M (2003) Minimum LM unit root test with two structural breaks. Rev Econ Stat 85(4):1082–1089
Lee J, Strazicich MC (2004) Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break. Appalachian State University, Boone
Li Q, Papell D (1999) Convergence of international output: time series evidence for 16 OECD countries. Int Rev Econ Finan 83:267–280
Lopez C, Papell D (2012) Convergence of euro area inflation rates. J Int Money Finan 31(6):1440–1458
Lowey M, Papell D (1996) Are U.S. regional incomes converging? Some further evidence. J Monet Econ 38:587–598
Lumsdaine R, Papell D (1997) Multiple trend breaks and the hypothesis. Rev Econ Stat 79(2):212–218
Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 429:407–437
Nelson C, Plosser C (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: some evidence and implications. J Monet Econ 10(2):139–162
Nieswiadomy M, Strazicich M (2004) Are political freedoms converging? Econ Inq 42:323–340
Nunes L, Newbold P, Kuan C (1997) Testing for unit roots with breaks: evidence on the great crash and the unit root hypothesis reconsidered. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 57:435–448
Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57:1346–1401
Perron P (1997) Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. J Econ 80:335–385
Perron P, Vogelsang TJ (1992) Nonstationarity and level shifts with an application to purchasing power parity. J Bus Econ Stat 10:301–320
Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in a time series regression. Biometrica 75:335–346
Quah D (1990) International patterns of growth: persistence in cross country disparities. Working paper, MIT
Quah D (1993) Galton’s fallacy and the tests of the convergence hypothesis. Scan J Econ 95(4):427–443
Sala-i-Martin X (1996) The classical approach to convergence analysis. Econ J 106:1019–1036
Schmidt P, Phillips PCB (1992) LM tests for a unit root in the presence of deterministic trends. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 54:257–287
Summers R, Heston A, Aten B (2012) Penn World Table Version 7.1. University of Pensylvania
Tomljanovich M, Vogelsang T (2002) Are U.S. regions converging? Using new econometric methods to examine old issues. Empirical Econ 27:49–62
Vogelsang TJ, Perron P (1998) Additional tests for a unit root allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time. Int Econ Rev 39:1071–1100
Zivot E, Andrews K (1992) Further evidence on the great 1015 crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10:251–270
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chapsa, X., Katrakilidis, C., Tabakis, N. (2015). Investigating the Convergence Hypothesis in the Eu: More Evidence Accounting for Structural Breaks. In: Karasavvoglou, A., Ongan, S., Polychronidou, P. (eds) EU Crisis and the Role of the Periphery. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10133-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10133-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10132-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10133-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)