Abstract
Despite a long tradition in philosophy and theology, later on in sociology, and nowadays visible in (social) psychology and neuroscience, we are still far from operating with a unitary framework for what agency is. This chapter will open with a discussion of four classic yet largely fruitless debates on this topic: (a) agency between complete freedom and the absence of freedom; (b) individual agency versus the agency of supra-individual agents; (c) agency as expressive versus agency as responsive; and (d) agency as originating in the brain versus the agency of the whole person. What comes out of these different, yet interrelated, dichotomies is a strong sense that agency is considered in unidirectional terms. A bidirectional type of thinking leads us to theorise co-agency as a more suitable concept defining the co-participation of person and world in all types of actions we define as ‘agentic’. The second part of this chapter will develop and exemplify a theoretical model in which co-agency is defined as the cyclical coordination between intentionality, (re)action and reflexivity, all situated within a world of social and material constraints. In the end, I will argue why we should reformulate the fundamental question of ‘do humans have agency?’ into a more urgent and pragmatic ‘how do we foster human co-agency?’. This reframing of the debate raises important concerns related to empowerment and the delicate issue of individual and collective responsibility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Online etymology dictionary, available from http://etymonline.com/.
- 2.
I am grateful to Constance de Saint-Laurent for discussions of this notion that centre on the notion of perspective.
References
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.
Bourdieu, P. (1990a). In other words: Essays toward a reflexive sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990b). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brentano, F. (1874). Psychology from an empirical standpoint, (1973 edition). London: Routledge.
Brockmeier, J. (2009). Reaching for meaning: Human agency and the narrative imagination. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 213–233.
Burns, T. R., & Dietz, T. (1992). Cultural evolution: Social rule systems, selection and human agency. International Sociology, September, 7(3), 259–283.
Cheliotis, L. K. (2006). How iron is the iron cage of new penology? The role of human agency in the implementation of criminal justice policy. Punishment & Society, 8(3), 313–340.
Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory & Psychology, 5, 467–481.
Cranach, M. von. (1982). The psychological study of goal-directed action: Basic issues. In M. von Cranach & R. Harré (Eds.), The analysis of action (pp. 35–73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Penguin.
Fiore, A. M., Yah, X., & Yoh, E. (2000). Effects of a product display and environmental fragrancing on approach responses and pleasurable experiences. Psychology & Marketing, 17(1), 27–54.
Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H. Jr. (1992). Human agency and responsible computing: Implications for computer system design. Journal of Systems and Software, 17(1), 7–14.
Gallagher, S. (2013). The socially extended mind. Cognitive Systems Research, 25/26, 4–12.
Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gillespie, A. (2006). Games and the development of perspective taking. Human Development, 49, 87–92.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Principles for a cultural psychology of creativity. Culture & Psychology, 16(2), 147–163.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). Creativity and folk art: A study of creative action in traditional craft. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(2), 140–154.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). From dichotomous to relational thinking in the psychology of creativity: A review of great debates. Creativity and Leisure: An Intercultural and Cross-disciplinary Journal, 1(2), 83–96.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Cham: Springer.
Glăveanu, V. P., & Gillespie, A. (2014). Creativity out of difference: Theorising semiotic, social and temporal gaps. In V. P. Glăveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.) Rethinking creativity: Contributions from cultural psychology (pp. 1–15). London: Routledge.
Glăveanu, V. P., & Lahlou, S. (2012). ‘Through the creator’s eyes’: Using the subjective camera to study craft creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 152–162.
Glăveanu, V. P., & Sierra, Z. (under review). Creativity and epistemologies of the south. Culture & Psychology
Gorovei, A. (2001). Ouăle de Paşte. Studiu de folclor (2nd ed.). Bucureşti: Paideia.
Gough, N. (1999). Rethinking the subject: (De)constructing human agency in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 35–48.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1994). Two stories about structure and agency. Review of International Studies, 20(3), 241–251.
Howarth, C. (2004). Re-presentation and resistance in the context of school exclusion: Reasons to be critical. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14(5), 356–377.
Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT.
Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288.
Jovchelovitch, S. (2014). The creativity of the social: Imagination, development and social change in Rio de Janeiro’s favelas. In V. P. Glăveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from cultural psychology (pp. 76–92). London: Routledge.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lavazza, A., & De Caro, M. (2010). Not so fast. On some bold neuroscientific claims concerning human agency. Neuroethics, 3(1), 23–41.
Libet, B. (2002). Do we have free will? In R. Kane (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of free will (pp. 551–564). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lubart, T. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité. Paris: Armand Colin.
Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1964). Selected writings: George Herbert Mead. A. J. Reck (Ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nash, L. (2005). The agency of nature or the nature of agency? Environmental History, 10(1), 67–69.
Pile, S. (1993). Human agency and human geography revisited: A critique of ‘new models’ of the self. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 18(1), 122–139.
Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship. London: The Herbert Press.
Reed, M. I. (1988). The problem of human agency in organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 9(1), 33–46.
Runco, M. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington: Elsevier.
Shapiro, S. P. (2005). Agency theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 263–284.
Shweder, R. (1990). Cultural psychology—What is it? In J. Stigler, R. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stoltman, J. J., Tapp, S. R., & Lapidus, R. S. (1989). An examination of shopping scripts. In T. K. Srull (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 16, pp. 384–391). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.
Thompson, A. (2001). Nations, national identities and human agency: Putting people back into nations. The Sociological Review, 49(1), 18–32.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development: An introduction. London: Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. New Delhi: Sage.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. IV, pp. 1–251). New York: Plenum.
Weisberg, R. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of the genius. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Wilf, E. (2011). Sincerity versus self-expression: Modern creative agency and the materiality of semiotic forms. Cultural Anthropology, 26(3), 462–484.
Wight, C. (2004). State agency: Social action without human activity? Review of International Studies, 30(2), 269–280.
Williams, R. N. (1992). The human context of agency. American Psychologist, 47(6), 725–760.
Yamazumi, K. (2007). Human agency and educational research: A new problem in activity theory. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 1, 19–39.
Zahacinschi, M., & Zahacinschi, N. (1992). Ouăle de Paşti la români. Bucureşti: Editura Sport-Turism.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glăveanu, V. (2015). From Individual Agency to Co-agency. In: Gruber, C., Clark, M., Klempe, S., Valsiner, J. (eds) Constraints of Agency. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10130-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10130-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10129-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10130-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)