Skip to main content

The Entity-Flow Perspective in Business Process Models

  • Conference paper
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8645))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1384 Accesses

Abstract

The research reported in this paper is grounded on the principles of the artifact-centric approach and stresses the importance of the entity-flow perspective in business process models with the help of a notation named ACTA. ACTA process models are based on a number of entity-flow patterns, which help readers understand the operation of the process before looking at the task descriptions. In particular, these patterns emphasize choice situations such as those related to the grouping or matching of input entities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data & Knowledge Engineering 53, 129–162 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alter, S.: Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 448–469 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharya, K., et al.: A model-driven approach to industrializing discovery processes in pharmaceutical research. IBM Systems Journal 44(1), 145–162 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. BPMN, Business Process Model and Notation, V.2.0.2 (2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/ (retrieved February 6, 2014)

  5. Bruno, G.: Coordination issues in artifact-centric business process models. In: Decker, H., Lhotská, L., Link, S., Basl, J., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) DEXA 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8055, pp. 209–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chao, T., et al.: Artifact-Based Transformation of IBM Global Financing. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 261–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hull, R., et al.: Introducing the Guard-Stage-Milestone Approach for Specifying Business Entity Lifecycles (Invited Talk). In: Bravetti, M. (ed.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 1–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kucukoguz, E., Su, J.: On lifecycle constraints of artifact-centric workflows. In: Bravetti, M. (ed.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 71–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kumaran, S., Liu, R., Wu, F.Y.: On the duality of information-centric and activity-centric models of business processes. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 32–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: Towards object-aware process management systems: issues, challenges, benefits. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD 2009. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 197–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: PHILharmonicFlows: towards a framework for object-aware process management. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 23(4), 205–244 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer, A., Pufahl, L., Fahland, D., Weske, M.: Modeling and enacting complex data dependencies in business processes. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 171–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Müller, D., Reichert, M., Herbst, J.: Data-driven modeling and coordination of large process structures. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 131–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Nigam, A., Caswell, N.S.: Business artifacts: an approach to operational specification. IBM Systems Journal 42(3), 428–445 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M., Sadiq, W., Schulz, K.: When workflows will not deliver: The case of contradicting work practice. In: 8th Int. Conference on Business Information Systems (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sanz, J.L.C.: Entity-centric operations modeling for business process management - A multidisciplinary review of the state-of-the-art. In: 6th IEEE Int. Symposium on Service Oriented System Engineering, pp. 152–163. IEEE Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. UML. Unified Modeling Language, V.2.4.1 (2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1/ (retrieved February 6, 2014)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bruno, G. (2014). The Entity-Flow Perspective in Business Process Models. In: Decker, H., Lhotská, L., Link, S., Spies, M., Wagner, R.R. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8645. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10085-2_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10085-2_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10084-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10085-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics