Skip to main content

Discourse-Level Politeness and Implicature

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8417))

Abstract

This paper considers politeness at the discourse level in terms of strategic choice. We begin with a discussion of the nature and levels of linguistic politeness from semantic and pragmatic perspectives, then turning to the way in which such strategies can be realized in natural language. A distinction is drawn between formal and polite linguistic behavior. We then provide a formal analysis in terms of the topological analysis of game strategies in an infinitely repeated game. This analysis extends that of [2]. It improves on that earlier work in three ways: (i) by considering a wider range of player ‘types’, (ii) by implementing the distinction between formality and politeness, and (iii) by analyzing a much wider range of kinds of politeness strategies, together with their positions in the Borel hierarchy [8].

We would like to thank the audience of LENLS 13 for helpful comments and discussion. The first author would also like to acknowledge the support of JSPS Kiban C Grant #25370441, which partially supported this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Actually anta and kimi seem to be relatively close in level of formality.

  2. 2.

    Thanks to Daisuke Bekki for extensive and useful discussion here.

  3. 3.

    As usual, whether this commitment is accepted by the hearer is independent of its introduction; cf. e.g. [6].

  4. 4.

    Surely most of these cases involve ‘himself’ rather than the other option(s).

  5. 5.

    Presumably this dialect also has a strategic use, by those who wish to appear lovelorn. We will disregard this complexity here.

References

  1. Alexander, J.: The Structural Evolution of Morality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. McCready, E., Asher, N., Paul, S.: Winning strategies in politeness. In: Motomura, Y., Butler, A., Bekki, D. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7856, pp. 87–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Asher, N., Paul, S.: Conversations as Banach-Mazur games (2012). Submitted to Discourse and Dialogue

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asher, N., Quinley, J.: Begging questions, their answers and basic cooperativity. In: Okumura, M., Bekki, D., Satoh, K. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7258, pp. 3–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, P., Levinson, S.: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, C.: Constraining interpretation: sentence final particles in Japanese. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gale, D., Stewart, F.M.: Infinite games with perfect information. Ann. Math. Stud. 28, 245–266 (1953)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kechris, A.: Descriptive Set Theory. Springer, New York (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, D.A.: Borel determinacy. Ann. Math. 102(2), 363–371 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. McCready, E.: Varieties of conventional implicature. Semant. Pragm. 3, 1–57 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCready, E.: Reliability in pragmatics. Oxford University Press (2013) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCready, E., Asher, N., Paul, S.: Winning strategies in politeness. In: Motomura, Y., Butler, A., Bekki, D. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7856, pp. 87–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Potts, C.: The expressive dimension. Theor. Linguist. 33, 165–198 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Potts, C., Kawahara, S.: Japanese honorifics as emotive definite descriptions. In: Proceedings of SALT XIV (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quinley, J.: Trust games as a model for requests. In: Lassiter, D., Slavkovik, M. (eds.) New Directions in Logic, Language, and Computation. LNCS, vol. 7415, pp. 221–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Searle, J.: The Construction of Social Reality. Free Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sells, P., Kim, J.B.: Korean honorification: a kind of expressive meaning. J. East Asian Linguist. 16, 303–336 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Watts, R.: Politeness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolfe, P.: The strict determinateness of certain infinite games. Pac. J. Math. 5(1), 841–847 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zahavi, A., Zahavi, A.: The Handicap Principle. Oxford University Press, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elin McCready .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

McCready, E., Asher, N. (2014). Discourse-Level Politeness and Implicature. In: Nakano, Y., Satoh, K., Bekki, D. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8417. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10061-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10061-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10060-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10061-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics