Skip to main content

Agricultural Subsidies in the USA—History, Implications, and Critiques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Great Nations at Peril

Part of the book series: The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences ((EHES,volume 17))

Abstract

Agricultural subsidies in the USA and the effects of these subsidies are controversial. The aim of this chapter is to discuss the historical background of these subsidies, analyze their effects on agricultural production in the USA, and explore to what extent these subsidies have an effect on food production, price, and public health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Less than 1 % of total subsidies go toward fruits and vegetables. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Health vs. Pork: Congress Debates the Farm Bill, 2007, 17 June 2011 http://www.pcrm.org/magazine/gm07autumn/health_pork.html.

  2. 2.

    As of 2007, corporate farms owned 125 million acres of farmland. In 2007, the average family farm in California was 200 acres and earned an average income of $ 167,179. In comparison, the average corporate farm in California comprised 784 acres of farmland and earned over $ 2.1 million. United States Census Bureau,“Farms—Number and Acreage by Size of Farm,” 2007, Census of Agriculture, Volume 1, 19 June 2011. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2011/tables/11s0824.pdf.

  3. 3.

    Small farmers are defined as farmers that earn less than $ 1000 a year from agricultural sales. US Environmental Protection Agency, Agricultural Demographics, 10 September 2009, 17 June 2011 www.epa.gov/oecaagct/ag101/demographics.html.

  4. 4.

    From 1995 to 2005: 73.8 % of food subsidies went to livestock, 13.23 % went to grains, and 0.37 % went toward fresh fruit and vegetables. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Health vs. Pork: Congress Debates the Farm Bill, 2007, 17 June 2011 http://www.pcrm.org/magazine/gm07autumn/health_pork.html.

  5. 5.

    Meat consumption in the USA has almost doubled since 1950. Jonathon Safran Foer, Eating Animals (New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2009).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen Leary .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leary, K. (2015). Agricultural Subsidies in the USA—History, Implications, and Critiques. In: Backhaus, J. (eds) Great Nations at Peril. The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10055-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics