Skip to main content

Elements of a Theory of the Firm in Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The idea of business firm was not strange to the Classics of Political Economy despite the fact that the concept of the firm was officially introduced by Ronald Coase in 1937. It is the object of this chapter to challenge the commonly received view about the lack of a classical theory of the firm and to suggest further information about the nature of the firm in the work of Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill. It will be revealed that under various names—such as ‘private and public companies’, ‘joint-stock companies’, ‘little firms’ etc.—the idea of business firm as an institution was already discussed and thoroughly developed. Smith and Mill have provided two distinct explanations for the existence of firms, related to the advantages of the division of labor and the needs for larger capital accumulation respectively.

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2007 ICABE at the University of Piraeus and the 13th Annual ESHET conference at the University of Macedonia in 2009. I am grateful to the attendants of both sessions as well to Prof. T. Lianos and G. Bitros for their useful remarks and comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although the concept is introduced by J.R. Commons in 1931 and definitely established by Coase, the term ‘TC’ was coined by Arrow in a US Congress committee paper in 1969, as Williamson (1985, 18) reports. For a detailed analysis of the concept see Furubotn and Richter (1998, 47–76).

  2. 2.

    Beraud (1992, 318) traces the influence of Diderot and makes full account of the effects of the division of labour according to Smith. As known, Plato and Xenophon have already analyzed both ideas of the social and technical division of labor. See Schumpeter (1954, 56) and Karayiannis (1990a). Smith has also recognised the alienating effects of the over-extended division of labour on workers’ character and intellectual ability (1776 II, 302–3). Cf. West (1996).

  3. 3.

    Pitelis (1998, 1012) explains the emergence of firms as “the result of the merchants’ desire to further their interests by effecting a more efficient division of labor”, without mentioning Smith.

  4. 4.

    For a careful study of the entrepreneurial functions according to Say, see Fontaine (1999) and Hébert and Link (1982, 17–20) who also evaluate Cantillon's contribution. Cf. Karayiannis (1990b).

  5. 5.

    Mill speaks about the legal forms of firms when he discusses the “ordinary functions of Government” in the last Book of the Principles (Chaps VIII & IX), in order to suggest the need for modernizing business law regulations.

References

  • Arrow K (1983) Innovation in large and small firms. In: Swedberg R (ed) Entrepreneurship. The social science view. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000, pp 229–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W (1968) Entrepreneurship in economic theory. Am Econ Rev 58:64–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Beraud A (1992) La contribution fondatrice. Origine et développement de la pensée économique d’Adam Smith. In: Beraud A, Faccarello G (eds) Nouvelle histoire de la pensée économique. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug M (1986) Entrepreneurship before and after Schumpeter. In Swedberg R (ed) Entrepreneurship. The social science view. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000, pp 76–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase R (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4:386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase R (1992) The institutional structure of production. Am Econ Rev 82:713–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine P (1999) Classical political economy between two fires: Jean-Baptiste Say and Frank Knight on the enterprise economy. Hist Polit Econ 31:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn E, Richter R (1998) Institutions and economic theory (2nd edn). University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert R, Link A (1982) The entrepreneur: mainstream views and radical critiques. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson HM, Quandt RE (1958) Microeconomic theory. MacGraw-Hill, New York, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson M (2007) Entrepreneurship and institutions. Comp Labour Law Policy J 28:717–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (1998) Competence and contract in the theory of the firm. J Econ Behav Organ 35:19–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (2001) How economics forgot history. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (2006) What are institutions? J Econ Issues 40:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Karayiannis A (1990a) The Platonic ethico-economic structure of society. Quaderni di Storia dell’Economia Politica 8:3–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Karayiannis A (1990b) The entrepreneurial function in economic literature: a synoptic review. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali 37:245–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Ménard C (1994) Organizations as coordinating devices. Metroeconomica 45:224–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ménard C (1995) Markets as institutions versus organizations as markets. Disentangling some fundamental concepts. J Econ Behav Organ 28:161–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1848) Principles of political economy with some of their applications to social philosophy, 7th edn 1873, re-edited by William J. Ashley 1909. A. Kelley, New York reprint, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis C (1998) Transaction costs and the historical evolution of the capitalist firm. J Econ Issues 32:999–1017

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1954) History of economic analysis. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (2011) Uses and abuses of Adam Smith. Hist Polit Econ 43:257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • West EG (1996) Adam Smith on the cultural effects of specialization: splenetics versus economics. Hist Polit Econ 28:83–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1992) Markets, hierarchies and the modern corporation: an unfolding perspective. J Econ Behav Organ 17:335–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1994) Transaction cost economics and organization theory. In: Smelser NJ, Swedberg R (eds) Handbook of economic sociology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel S. Zouboulakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zouboulakis, M.S. (2015). Elements of a Theory of the Firm in Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill. In: Bitros, G., Kyriazis, N. (eds) Essays in Contemporary Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10043-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics