Abstract
The number of post-separation families has been increasing in Europe since the 1960s although there are considerable differences in the divorce and separation rates across European countries. In most cases, families do not break up after separation or divorce; they rather go through processes of spatio-temporal, emotional, and social reorganisation. Furthermore, ‘residential mobility’, ‘visiting mobility’, and ‘escorting mobility’ constitute three different forms of spatial mobility, which play a central role in post-separation family life. However, little research has been done and few statistics are available concerning this issue as well as the impact of these different forms of spatial mobilities on family members and their daily lives. This paper aims to address these deficiencies by introducing an approach to multi-local and family practices to investigate the role of spatial mobilities in post-separation family life for both children and their separated parents. Using empirical research findings on post-separation multi-local families in Germany, the study focuses on the requirements which arise for children and their parents with residential moves and on the strategies the families employ to cope with the resultant multi-local living conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Because terms are used differently in diverse research fields, it deems important to explain my terminological use. In the following, I will use the terms ‘relocation’, ‘residential mobility’ and ‘moves’ synonymously for the acts of separated parents changing their usual residence including short or long distance migrations. Thus my use of the term ‘relocation’ will not be reserved for those situations where a parent’s request to move with a child becomes part of a contested legal case, as it is widely done in legal-oriented research literature. Furthermore, my terminological use also differs from distinctions between ‘residential mobility’, ‘internal’ and ‘international migration’ used mainly in migration research (Newbold 2010). The distinctive criteria used in these definitions such as distance, the impact of legal aspects on migration as well as the change or otherwise of activity space as a result of a residential move point out important aspects for the problems discussed in this article. But conventional terms are not really suitable for the issue of interest here, that is the consequences of parental residential moves and the resulting residential distances of family members to each other for the ‘doing family’ and the everyday life in post-separation living situations (i.e. the alternating of children between their parents homes). To address this issue, a terminology which refers to the distances established through the move of a separated parent relative to the residence of an ex-partner is needed. Thus, I will use the terms ‘short distance’ or ‘local-scale’ to label intra-urban moves that enable maintaining the previous activity space for relocators. Such a distance between the parents’ households is easy to handle by walking, bicycling, or using public transport. Older children may visit the parent in a self-determined manner without accompaniment or involvement (i.e. financial) of the other parent. I will use ‘middle distance’ when referring to moves involving changing activity space for relocating parent and children, but the residence of the ex-partner remains at a distance that is relatively easy to reach (up to about one hour travel time) as well as ‘long distance’ to characterize interregional or international relocations involving changing activity space, and probably cultural environment for the relocating parent as well as children and distances between the residences of parents which entail more than one hour travel time and the necessity of using transport such as a car, train or plane.
- 2.
Shared residence refers to the situation where children reside in equal amounts of time with each parent after divorce or separation.
- 3.
Although the terms ‘external parent’ and ‘non-residential parent’ are not well suited for the study of post-separation families from a multi-local perspective, both terms are used synonymously in this article to describe the parent with whom the child lives less often.
- 4.
The Research Group is funded by the Volkswagen Foundation and hosted by the German Youth Institute (DJI) in Munich. For more details see www.dji.de/multilokale_familie
- 5.
Data analysis of the ethnographic study is largely the result of the teamwork of Anna Monz, Diane Nimmo, Nina Bathmann, and Michaela Schier.
- 6.
We suppose that this is a sampling bias resulting from the wording “separated parents and their children living here and there” in our recruitment announcement. Although we tried to recruit separated parents with low education or income, we had little access to this group.
- 7.
Data analysis of the AID:A survey (2009) was done by Sandra Hubert, researcher at the German Youth Institute in Munich, Germany.
- 8.
As a rule, separated parents agree with each other on when, how, and where the change of the children from one parental home to the other occurs.
- 9.
The determination of the child’s post-separation residential arrangement is generally not a legal issue in Germany. The right and obligation to determine the child’s place of abode (“Aufenthaltsbestimmungsrecht”) is regarded as part of the parental responsibility for the child (§ 1631 para. 1 German CC). Mothers and fathers can choose various arrangements to care for their children after a separation, although the law, as well as most divorce professionals, take the so-called primary residence model as the default option (Dethloff and Martiny 2005).
- 10.
Because of her job, the mother in this family had been a long-distance weekly commuter for many years before the break-up.
- 11.
This is a post-separation living arrangement where the parents go back and forth from a residence in which the child/children reside.
References
Ahrons, C. (1979). The binuclear family. Alternative Lifestyles, 2(4), 499–515.
Amato, P. R., & Gilbreth, J. G. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children’s well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 557–573.
Andreß, H.-J., Bergloh, B., Güllner, M., & Wilking, K. (2003). Wenn aus Liebe rote Zahlen werden. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
BIB. (2013). Scheidungsziffern der Ehen in Deutschland, West- und Ostdeutschland, 1960 bis 2011. http://www.bib-demografie.de/SharedDocs/Publikationen/DE/Download/Abbildungen/05/Daten/a_05_04_ehescheidungsziffern_d_wob_oeb_ab1960_daten.xls?__blob=publicationFile&v=5. Accessed 25 Oct 2013.
Bien, W., & Marbach, J. (1991). Haushalt – Verwandtschaft – Beziehungen. In H. Bertram (Ed.), Die Familie in Westdeutschland (pp. 3–44). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Braver, S. L., Ellman, I. M., & Fabricius, W. V. (2003). Relocation of children after divorce and children’s best interests. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(2), 206–219.
Dethloff, N., & Martiny, D. (2005). National report: Germany. Report on parental responsibilities to the commission on European family law. http://www2.law.uu.nl/priv/cefl/. Accessed 14 Dec 2011.
Dewilde, C. (2008). Divorce and the housing movements of owners-occupiers. Housing Studies, 23(6), 809–832.
Feijten, P., & Mulder, C. H. (2005). Life-course experience and housing quality. Housing Studies, 20(4), 571–587.
Feijten, P., & van Ham, M. (2007). Residential mobility and migration of the divorced and separated. Demographic Research, 17(21), 623–654.
Feijten, P., & van Ham, M. (2010). The impact of splitting up and divorce on housing careers in the UK. Housing Studies, 25(4), 483–507.
Feijten, P., & van Ham, M. (2011). The impact of union dissolution on moving distances and destinations in the UK (IZA Discussion Paper No. 5628), Bonn. http://ftp.iza.org/dp5628.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2013.
Flowerdew, R., & Al-Hamad, A. (2004). The relationship between marriage, divorce and migration in a British dataset. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(2), 339–351.
Gardner, K., & Grillo, R. (2002). Transnational households and ritual: An overview. Global Networks, 2(3), 179–190.
Gerber, K. (2011). Räumliche Mobilität im Wandel. Wanderungen im Lebenslauf und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Stadtentwicklung in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Gram-Hanssen, K., & Bech-Danielsen, C. (2004). House, home and identity from a consumption perspective. Housing, Theory and Society, 21(1), 17–26.
Gram-Hanssen, K., & Bech-Danielsen, C. (2008). Home dissolution: What happens after separating? Housing Studies, 23(3), 507–522.
Hater, K. (2003). Heute hier, morgen dort – Wohnerfahrungen von Kindern nach Trennung und Scheidung. Diskurs, 13(2), 42–49.
Haugen, G. M. D. (2010). Children’s perspective on everyday experiences of shared residence. Children & Society, 24(2), 112–122.
Horsfall, B., & Kaspiew, R. (2010). Relocation in separated and non-separated families. Australian Journal of Family Law, 24(1), 34–56.
Jensen, A.-M. (2007). Mobile and uprooted? Children and the changing family. In H. Zeiher, D. Devine, A. T. Kjørholt, & H. Strandell (Eds.), Flexible childhood? Exploring children’s welfare in time and space (pp. 121–142). Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
Jensen, A.-M. (2009). Mobile children: Small captives of large structures? Children & Society, 23(2), 123–135.
Jurczyk, K., Schier, M., Szymenderski, P., Lange, A., & Voß, G. G. (2009). Entgrenzte Arbeit – Entgrenzte Familie. Berlin: edition sigma.
Kaspiew, R., Behrens, J., & Smyth, B. (2011). Relocation disputes in separated families prior to the 2006 reforms: An empirical study. Family Matters, 86, 72–78.
Lauritzen, T. (2011, October 21). Children’s constructions of home between two households and the significance of the journey in their everyday lives. Presentation manuscript for the international workshop “The everyday life of multi-local families”, Munich.
Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking family practices. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moxnes, K. (2003). Children coping with parental divorce. In A.-M. Jensen & L. McKee (Eds.), Children and the changing family (pp. 90–104). London: Routledge.
Mulder, C. H., & Malmberg, G. (2011). Moving related to separation. Environment and Planning A, 43(11), 2589–2607.
Mulder, C. H., Ten Hengel, B., Latten, J. J., & Das, M. (2012). Relative resources and moving from the joint home around divorce. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27(2), 153–168.
Newbold, B. (2010). Population geography. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Nimmo, D. (2011, October 21). Living in two worlds: A German case study on children in post-separation families. Presentation manuscript for the international workshop “The everyday life of multi-local families”, Munich.
Parrenas, R. (2005). Long distance intimacy. Global Networks, 5(4), 317–336.
Proske, A., & Bathmann, N. (2011, October 21). Challenges and opportunities of multi-local post-separation family life for parents in Germany. Presentation manuscript for the international workshop “The everyday life of multi-local families”, Munich.
Schier, M. (2009). Räumliche Entgrenzung von Arbeit und Familie. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 1/2, 55–66.
Schier, M. (2011, October 20). Doing family under multi-local conditions. Presentation manuscript for the international workshop “The everyday life of multi-local families”, Munich.
Schier, M. (2013a). Multilokale Wohnarrangements von Müttern, Vätern und ihren Kindern nach Trennung und Scheidung. In O. Schwedes (Ed.), Räumliche Mobilität in der Zweiten Moderne (pp. 189–212). Berlin: LIT.
Schier, M. (2013b, June 11–14). Children’s spatial mobility – A central element of multi-local post-separation family life. Presentation manuscript for the session “contemporary geographies of children and youth: present and future challenges” at the 5th Nordic Geographers’ meeting, Reykjavik, Island.
Schier, M., & Jurczyk, K. (2007). Familie als Herstellungsleistung in Zeiten der Entgrenzung. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 34, 10–17.
Schier, M., & Proske, A. (2010). One child, two homes. How families succeed in reorganizing daily life after a separation. DJI-Bulletin, Special English edition, 16–18.
Schier, M., Bathmann, N., Hubert, S., Nimmo, D., & Proske, A. (2011). Wenn Eltern sich trennen: Familienleben an mehreren Orten. Auf einen Blick. DJI Online Thema 2011/12, http://www.dji.de/cgi-bin/projekte/output.php?projekt=1120&Jump1=LINKS&Jump2=10. Accessed 6 Aug 2012.
Schmidt-Denter, U., & Beelmann, W. (1995). Familiäre Beziehungen nach Trennung und Scheidung. Köln: Universität Köln.
Schmitz, H. (2000). Familiäre Strukturen sechs Jahre nach einer elterlichen Trennung. Regensburg: Roderer.
Sieder, R. (2008). Patchworks – das Familienleben getrennter Eltern und ihrer Kinder. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Silva, E., & Smart, C. (1999). The “new” practices and politics of family life. In E. Silva & C. Smart (Eds.), The new family (pp. 1–12). London: Sage.
Smart, C. (2002). From children’s shoes to children’s voices. Family Court Review, 40(3), 307–319.
Smart, C., Neale, B., & Wade, A. (2001). The changing experience of childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Smyth, B. (2005). Parent–child contact in Australia. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 19(1), 1–22.
Smyth, B., & Moloney, L. (2008). Changes in patterns of post-separation parenting over time. Journal of Family Studies, 14(1), 7–22.
Smyth, B., Temple, J., Behrens, J., & Richardson, N. (2008). Post-separation geographic mobility in Australia. In J. Behrens, B. Smyth, & R. Kaspiew (Eds.), Relocation disputes in Australia (pp. 17–43). Canberra: The Australian National University.
South, S. J., Crowder, K. D., & Trent, K. (1998). Children’s residential mobility and neighborhood environment following parental divorce and remarriage. Social Forces, 77(2), 667–693.
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2013). Ehescheidungen und betroffene minderjährige Kinder. https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Bevoelkerung/Ehescheidungen/Tabellen/EhescheidungenKinder.html?nn=50734. Accessed 25 Oct 2013.
Symon, P. (Ed.). (1990). Housing and divorce. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
Taylor, N. J., & Freeman, M. (2010). International research evidence on relocation. Family Law Quarterly, 44(3), 317–339.
Tazi-Preve, M., Kapella, O., Kaindl, M., Klepp, D., Krenn, B., Titton, M., & Seyyed-Hashemi, S. (2007). Väter im Abseits. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Walper, S., & Gödde, M. (2005). Jugendliche und ihre Beziehung zum Vater. In B. Schuster, H.-P. Kuhn, & H. Uhlendorf (Eds.), Entwicklung in sozialen Beziehungen (pp. 65–89). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
Werneck, H. (2004). Vater-Kind-Beziehungen in Nachscheidungsfamilien. In U. Zartler, L. Wilk, & R. Kränzl-Nagl (Eds.), Wenn Eltern sich trennen (pp. 155–180). Frankfurt: Campus.
Widmer, E., & Jallinoja, R. (Eds.). (2008). Beyond the nuclear family. Berne: Peter Lang.
Wilding, R. (2006). Virtual intimacies. Global Networks, 6(2), 125–142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schier, M. (2015). Post-Separation Families: Spatial Mobilities and the Need to Manage Multi-Local Everyday Life. In: Aybek, C., Huinink, J., Muttarak, R. (eds) Spatial Mobility, Migration, and Living Arrangements. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10021-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10021-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10020-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10021-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)