Abstract
The stakeholder network is an important contributing factor in influencing corporations to be socially and ethically accountable. This chapter summarises some of the roles of the stakeholders discussed in the prior chapters with the help of an extended analysis of legitimacy theory. Members of the stakeholder network, in particular, the media and NGOs, are the focus of the discussion. The chapter concludes with a theoretical model derived from stakeholder network and legitimacy theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams CA, McPhail K (2004) Reporting and the politics of difference: (non)disclosure on ethnic minorities. Abacus 40(3):405–435
Adams CA, Hill WY, Roberts CB (1995) Environmental, employee and ethical reporting in Europe. ACCA, London
Ader C (1995) A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journalism Mass Comm Q 72(2):300–11
Arenas D, Lozano J, Albareda L (2009) The role of NGOs in CSR: mutual perceptions among stakeholders. J Bus Ethics 88(1):175–197
Ashforth BE, Gibbs BW (1990) The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organ Sci 1:177–194
Braithwaite J (2006) Responsive regulation and developing economies. World Dev 34(5):884–898
Carpenter C (2001) Business, green groups and the media: the role of non-governmental organizations in the climate change debate. Int Affairs 77(2):313–28
Chalmers D (2000) Post-nationalism and the quest for constitutional substitutes. J Law Society 27:178
Davis J (1995) The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. Journalism Mass Comm Q 72:285–301
Deegan C, Blomquist C (2006) Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: an exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian Minerals Industry. Account Org Soc 31:343–72
Deegan C, Gordon B (1996) A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Account Bus Res 26(3):187–99
Elsbach KD (1994) Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry. Adm Sci Q 39(1):57–88
Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2006) The symbolic management of strategic change: sense giving via framing and decoupling. Acad Manage J 49(6):1173–1193
Gamson W, Modigliani A (1987) The changing culture of affirmative action. In: Braungart R (ed) Research in political sociology, vol 3. Jai Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 137–77
Hilgartner S, Bosk C (1988) The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model. Am J Sociol 94(1):53–78
Huckins K (1999) Interest-group influence on the media agenda: a case study. J Mass Commun Q 76(1):76–86
Islam M, Deegan C (2008) Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information: evidence from Bangladesh. Account Audit Account J 21(6):850–74
Islam MA, Deegan C (2010) Media pressures and corporate disclosure of social responsibility performance information: a study of two global clothing and sports retail companies. Account Bus Res 40(2):131–148
Kim SH, Scheufele DA, Shanahan J (2002) Think about it this way: attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public’s evaluation of a local issue. Journalism Mass Comm Q 79(1):7–25
Li G (2001) An analysis: the impact of non-government organizations on the practices of public relations. Publ Relat Q 46(4):11–14
McCombs M, Shaw D (1972) The agenda setting function of the mass media. Public Opin Q 36:176–87
Muchlinski P (2003) Human rights, social responsibility and the regulation of international business: the development of international standards by intergovernmental organisations. Non-State Actors Int Law 3:123–152
Neuman W (1990) The threshold of public attention. Public Opin Q 49:159–76
Newson M, Deegan C (2002) Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore and South Korea. Int J Account 37:183–213
O’Dwyer B, Owen D (2005) Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation. Br Account Rev 37(2):205–29
Selznick P (1992) The moral commonwealth: social theory and the promise of community. University of California Press, Berkeley
Suchman M (1995) Localism and globalism in institutional analysis: the emergence of contractual norms in venture finance. In: Scott W, Chriatensen S (eds) The institutional construction of organizations: international and longitudinal studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 39–66
Taylor M, Doerfel M (2005) Another dimension to explicating relationships: measuring inter-organizational linkages. Publ Relat Rev 31:121–29
Tilt C (1994) The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure. Account Audit Account J 7(4):47–72
Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1994) Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long-term incentive plans. Adm Sci Q 39(3):367–390
Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1998) The symbolic management of stockholders: corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Adm Sci Q 43(1):127–154
Zarzeski M (1996) Spontaneous harmonisation effects of culture and market forces on accounting disclosure practices. Account Horiz 10(1):18–37
Zott C, Huy QN (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Adm Sci Q 52(1):70–105
Zucker H (1978) The variable nature of news media influence. In: Rubin B (ed) Communication yearbook No 2. Transaction, New Jersey, pp 225–45
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Islam, M.A. (2015). Stakeholder Network and Corporate Legitimacy: An Extended Analysis. In: Social Compliance Accounting. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09997-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09997-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09996-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09997-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)