Predictive Modeling for 2D Form Design

  • Erhan Batuhan Arisoy
  • Gunay Orbay
  • Levent Burak Kara
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8641)


In product design, designers often generate a large number of concepts in the form of sketches and drawings to develop and communicate their ideas. Concrete concepts typically evolve through a progressive refinement of initially coarse and ambiguous ideas. However, a lack of suitable means to visualize the emerging form at these early stages forces the designer to constantly maintain and negotiate an elusive mental image. To assist this process, we describe a predictive modeling technique that allows early, incomplete 2D sketches to be transformed into suggestive complete models. This helps designers take a sneak peek at the potential end result of a developing concept, without forcing them to commit to the suggestion. We demonstrate and discuss preliminary results of our technique on 2D shape design problems.


CAD predictive modeling conceptual design 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Tversky, B., Suwa, M.: Thinking with sketches. Tools for Innovatio 1(9), 75–85 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grabli, S., Durand, F., Sillion, F.: Density measure for line-drawing simplification. In: Proceedings of the 12th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, PG 2004, pp. 309–318 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson, B., Ma, K.-L.: Rendering complexity in computer-generated pen-and-ink illustrations. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering, NPAR 2004, pp. 129–137. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barla, P., Thollot, J., Sillion, F.X.: Geometric clustering for line drawing simplification. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Sketches, SIGGRAPH 2005. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nealen, A., Igarashi, T., Sorkine, O., Alexa, M.: Fibermesh: designing freeform surfaces with 3D curves. ACM Trans. Graph. 26(3), 41 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sezgin, T.M., Stahovich, T., Davis, R.: Sketch based interfaces: early processing for sketch understanding. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Courses, SIGGRAPH 2006. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fu, L., Kara, L.B.: Neural network-based symbol recognition using a few labeled samples. Computers & Graphics 35(5), 955–966 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Novick, L., Tversky, B.: Cognitive constraints on ordering operations: The case of geometric analogies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116(1), 50 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    LaViola, J., Zeleznik, R.: Mathpad2: A system for the creation and exploration of mathematical sketches. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 23, 432–440 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Igarashi, T., Matsuoka, S., Tanaka, H.: Teddy: a sketching interface for 3D freeform design. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1999, p. 21. ACM (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldberg, D.: Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-wesley (1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blumer, A., Ehrenfeucht, A., Haussler, D., Warmuth, M.K.: Occam’s razor. Information processing letters 24(6), 377–380 (1987)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erhan Batuhan Arisoy
    • 1
  • Gunay Orbay
    • 1
  • Levent Burak Kara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations