Skip to main content

Groupoids, Frobenius Algebras and Poisson Sigma Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Field Theories

Part of the book series: Mathematical Physics Studies ((MPST))

Abstract

This note is devoted to report some results proven in [5, 8] and some work in progress [6] concerning the relation between groupoids and Frobenius algebras specialized in the case of Poisson sigma models with boundary. We prove a correspondence between groupoids in Set and relative Frobenius algebras in Rel, as well as an adjunction between a special type of semigroupoids and relative H*-algebras. The connection between groupoids and Frobenius algebras is made explicit by introducing what we called weak monoids and relational symplectic groupoids, in the context of Poisson sigma models with boundary and in particular, describing such structures in the extended symplectic category and the category of Hilbert spaces. This is part of a joint work with Alberto Cattaneo and Chris Heunen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(\mathbf{Symp }^{ext}\) is not properly speaking a category, since the composition of canonical relations is not in general a smooth manifold; some transversality conditions are required. For our purposes, the smoothness of the composition of canonical relations will be guaranteed from the defining axioms of the relational symplectic groupoid.

  2. 2.

    A dagger Frobenius algebra on the category Hilb of finite dimensional Hilbert spaces corresponds to the usual notion of Frobenius algebra.

  3. 3.

    The symbol \(\nrightarrow \) denotes that we are considering relations instead of maps as morphisms.

  4. 4.

    More precisely, in \(\mathbf {Symp} ^{ext}\), by a morphism between two symplectic manifolds \((M,\omega _M)\) and \((N, \omega _N)\) we mean a pair \((X, p)\) where \(X\) is a smooth manifold, \(p\) is a smooth map from \(X\) to \(M\times N\), such that \(dp\) is surjective and \(T_x(\mathfrak {Im}(p))\) is a Lagrangian subspace of \(T(p(x))((M,\omega _M)\times (N, -\omega _N)), \forall x\in X\).

  5. 5.

    Here \(*\) denotes path concatenation.

  6. 6.

    In this case that we are considering complex valued functions we set \(\varepsilon = i\hbar / 2\).

References

  1. S. Abramsky, B. Coecke, in Categorical Quantum Mechanics, Handbook of Quantum Logic and Quantum Structures, vol. 2, ed. by K. Engesser, D. Gabbay, D. Lehman (Elsevier, London, 2009), pp. 261–325

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Abramsky, C. Heunen, H*-algebras and nonunital Frobenius algebras: first steps in infinite dimensional categorical quantum mechanics. Clifford Lectures, AMS Proc. Symposia Appl. Math. 71, 1–24 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A.S. Cattaneo, G. Felder, Progress in Mathematics 198, in Poisson Sigma Models And Symplectic Groupoids, in Quantization of Singular Symplectic Quotients, ed. by N.P. Landsman, M. Pflaum, M. Schlichenmeier (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2001), pp. 61–93

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. A.S. Cattaneo, P. Mnev, N. Reshetikhin, Classical and Quantum Lagrangian Field Theories with Boundary, in Proceedings of the Corfu Summer Institute 2011 School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity, PoS(CORFU2011)044 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Contreras, A.S. Cattaneo, Groupoids and Poisson Sigma Models With Boundary, preprint arXiv:1206.4330

  6. I. Contreras, Relational Symplectic Groupoids and Poisson Sigma Models with Boundary, Ph.D. Thesis, preprint

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Crainic, R.L. Fernandes, Integrability of Lie brackets. Ann. Math. 157(2), 575–620 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Heunen, I. Contreras, A.S. Cattaneo, Relative Frobenius algebras are groupoids. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 217, 114–124, arXiv:1306.3943 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Ikeda, Two-dimensional gravity and nonlinear gauge theory. Ann. Phys. 235, 435–464 (1994)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Kontsevich, Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds, Lett. Math. Phys. 66(3), 157–216 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Ševera, Some Title Containing the Words Homotopy and Symplectic, e.g. This One. Travaux Mathématiques 16, 121–137 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Schaller, T. Strobl, Poisson structure induced (topological) field theories. Modern Phys. Lett. A 9(33), 3129–3136 (1994)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Schaller, T. Strobl, Quantization of field theories generalizing gravity-Yang-Mills systems on the cylinder. Lect. Notes Phys. 436, 98–122 (1994)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Contreras .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Contreras, I. (2015). Groupoids, Frobenius Algebras and Poisson Sigma Models. In: Calaque, D., Strobl, T. (eds) Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Field Theories. Mathematical Physics Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09949-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics