Skip to main content

Sample Selection Bias in Mortgage Market Credit Risk Modeling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Econometrics and Empirical Market Microstructure
  • 2773 Accesses

Abstract

The mortgage crisis that started in the U.S. in 2007 and lasted until 2009 was characterized by an unusually large number of defaults on the subprime mortgage market. As a result, it developed into a global economic recession and placed the stability of the world banking system in jeopardy. Therefore, the issues of credit risk modeling showed the shortcomings of the current credit risk practice. Truncation, or partial observability, and simultaneous equations bias causes sample selection bias. As a result, parameter estimates are biased and inconsistent. Firstly, we provide an overview of current approaches in the mortgage literature to control for the sample selection bias correction, such as the Heckman model and bivariate probit model with selection. Secondly, a review of the most significant mortgage studies discussing this problem is introduced. Specifically, different structural models, specific datasets and empirical results are regarded. In addition, we discuss such key credit risk determinants as borrower characteristics, terms of the mortgage contract, mortgage characteristics, and macroeconomic conditions. Finally, we conclude the discussion with possible research questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashcraft, A., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Hull, P., & Vickery, J. (2011). Credit ratings and security prices in the subprime MBS market. The American Economic Review, 101(3), 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, M. Y., & Qi, Z. (2012). Competing risks models using mortgage duration data under the proportional hazards assumption. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 34(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajari, P., Chu, C. S., & Park, M. (2008). An empirical model of subprime mortgage default from 2000 to 2007. NBER, Working Paper 14625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.Y., & Cocco, J. (2011). A model of mortgage default. NBE, Working Paper No. 17516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, M. (2008). Some possible pitfalls of parametric inference. Quantile, 4, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutts, A. C., & Merrill, W. A. (2008). Interventions in mortgage default: Policies and practices to prevent home loss and lower costs. Working Paper 08-01. Freddie Mac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Ariccia, G., Igan, D., & Laeven, L. (2012). Credit booms and lending standards: Evidence from the subprime mortgage market. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44(2–3), 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demyanyk, Y., & Van Hemert, O. (2011). Understanding the subprime mortgage crisis. Review of Financial Studies, 24(6), 1848–1880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerardi, K., Shapiro, A. H., & Willen, P. (2009). Decomposing the foreclosure crisis: House price depreciation versus bad underwriting. Working Paper No. 2009-25. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometic analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2009). Moral and social constraints to strategic default on mortgages. Working Paper No. 15145. NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a sample estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of Econometric Society, 47(1), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keys, B., Mukherjee, T., Seru, A., & Vig, V. (2009). Did securitization lead to lax screening? Evidence from subprime loans. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 307–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, S. J. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1992). Introduction to econometrics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S., & Trost, P. R. (1982). On measuring discrimination in loan markets. Housing Finance Review, 1(3), 245–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mian, A., & Sufi, A. (2009). The consequences of mortgage credit expansion: Evidence from the U.S. mortgage default crisis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 1449–1496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munnell, A., Tootell, G., Browne, L., & McEneaney, J. (1996). Mortgage lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA data. American Economic Review, 86, 25–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R., & Yezer, A. (1996). Self-selection and tests for bias and risk in mortgage lending: Can you price the mortgage if you don’t know the process? Journal of Real Estate Research, 11, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yezer, M. J., Phillips, R. F., & Trost, R. P. (1994). Bias in estimates of discrimination and default in mortgage lending: The effects of simultaneity and self-selection. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9(3), 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poirier, D. (1980). Partial observability in bivariate probit models. Journal of Econometrics, 12(2), 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Querica, R. G., Pennington-Cross, A., & Tian, C. Y. (2011). Mortgage default risk and local unemployment. Center for Community Capital, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Querica, R. G., Pennington-Cross, A., & Tian, C. Y. (2012). Differential impacts of structural and cyclical unemployment on mortgage default and prepayment. Center for Community Capital, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachlis, M. B., & Yezer, A. M. J. (1993). Serious flaws in statistical tests for discrimination in mortgage markets. Journal of Housing Research, 4(2), 315–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. L. (2000). Mortgage lending, sample selection and default. Real Estate Economics, 28, 581–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Anil K. Bera, Andreas A. Woudenberg and Alexander Karminsky for their helpful comments. This study was carried out with support from “The National Research University Higher School of Economics’ Academic Fund Program in 2013–2014, Research Grant No. 12-01-0130.” This survey was presented at the Perm Winter School-2013. The author is responsible for any errors that remain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agatha Lozinskaia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lozinskaia, A. (2015). Sample Selection Bias in Mortgage Market Credit Risk Modeling. In: Bera, A., Ivliev, S., Lillo, F. (eds) Financial Econometrics and Empirical Market Microstructure. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09946-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics