Skip to main content

The Culture of Information and the Information of Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Arts, Research, Innovation and Society

Part of the book series: Arts, Research, Innovation and Society ((ARIS))

  • 2088 Accesses

Abstract

The Culture of Information refers to a cultural structure that strips away information from its meaning and conduces information to be seen as a commodity. In this chapter one of the main propositions is that today’s global society should be examined through the reality of information overload that makes it possible to filter and promote standardized set of values and beliefs activities, thus leading to a mass culture produced from commercialization of information and its increased ability to wire people through information.

He who understands the situation is not well informed

Ablert Szent-Gyorgyi

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Searle (1995).

  2. 2.

    It is noteworthy to mentioned that a biological adaptation is an inborn form of behavior; but a culture is a learned form of behavior – a communally preferred form, which (like other inventions) has been adopted by a whole society.

  3. 3.

    Butler (1952).

  4. 4.

    Bourdieu (1993).

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    Babe (2009).

  7. 7.

    Ibid, pp. 4.

  8. 8.

    Dewey et al. (1999).

  9. 9.

    Ibid, pp. 8.

  10. 10.

    Benedict (2006).

  11. 11.

    Ibid, pp. 49. Emphasis added.

  12. 12.

    See Hofstede (1984).

  13. 13.

    See Carayannis and Pirzadeh (2014).

  14. 14.

    Lavalle et al. (2011).

  15. 15.

    For example, a red traffic light is data. The meaning that we attach to this data is “Stop”. When you drive up to a red light and stop, you do so because your brain sees the data and process it. For more details see http://www.ictweb.org/as_ict/as_knowledge_information_data.html

  16. 16.

    See Wikipedia under ‘Macy Conferences’.

  17. 17.

    Fairthorne (1954).

  18. 18.

    Melanie Mitchell, An introduction to Genetic Algorithms, MIT Press, 1998, p. 67. However, Mitchell explained further that while the Lamarckian hypothesis is rejected by almost all biologists, she still believed ‘learning (or more generally, phenotypic plasticity) can indeed have a significant effects on evolution, though in less ways than Lamarck suggested’ (ibid.). She then provided an example to explained her position, ‘an organism that has the capacity to learn that a particular plant is poisonous will be more likely to survive (by learning not to eat the plant) than organisms that are unable to learn this information, and thus will be more likely to produce offspring that also have this leaning capacity. Evolutionary variation will have a change to work on this line of offspring, allowing for the possibility that the trait – avoiding the poisonous plant – will be discovered genetically rather than learned anew each generation. Having the desired behavior encoded genetically would give an organism a selective advantage over organisms that were merely able to learn the desired behavior during their lifetimes, because learning behavior is generally less reliable process than developing a genetically coded behavior; too many unexpected things could get in the way of learning during an organism’s lifetime. Moreover, genetically encoded information can be available immediately after birth, whereas leaning takes time and sometimes requires potentially fatal trial and error. In short, the capacity to acquire a certain desired trait allows the learning organism to survive preferentially, thus giving genetic variation the possibility of independently discovering the desired trait. Without such learning, the likelihood of survival – and thus the opportunity for genetic discovery – decreases.’ (Ibid., p. 67).

  19. 19.

    Mason (2003).

  20. 20.

    C. Shannon, and W. Weaver, The mathematical theory of communication. Original work published in 1948. It should be noted that Shannon and Weaver’s The Mathematical Theory of Communication is not actually a co-authored book. The book consists of two essays: Weaver’s “Recent Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Communication” and Shannon’s, earlier paper, with the new title “The Mathematical Theory of Communication.” In fact as Lai Ma observed, “Most readings of information theory are based on Warren Weaver’s exposition of Shannon’s theory.” (see Lai Ma, “Meanings of Information: The Assumptions and Research Consequences of Three Foundational LIS Theories”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 717).

  21. 21.

    The reader should note that the Shannon–Weaver Model will be analyzed in more detail in a later section.

  22. 22.

    In 1983, Shaw and Davis already stated that “[M]uch theoretical work in information science is based on the Shannon-Weaver model of communication” (D. Shaw and C. H. Davis, “Entropy and information: A multidisciplinary overview”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1983, vol.34, no. 1, p. 71). More recently, Kalbach (2009) claims that Shannon and Weaver are the “fathers of modern information and communication theory” and that the concept of uncertainty in their work “underlies most aspects of our lives” (J. Kalbach, “On uncertainty in information architecture”, Journal of Information Architecture, 2009, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 48).

  23. 23.

    Gleick (2011).

  24. 24.

    McLuhan (1998a).

  25. 25.

    Dawkins (1996).

  26. 26.

    There are those who considered comparing humans with a machine takes away our enchanted and magical attributes, I do not subscribed to such characterization. On the personal note, such comparison does not make me feel less special. What a wonderful thing that collection of matters, formed by billion years of evolutionary process, have been able to create van Gogh’s Starry Night or Bach prelude.

  27. 27.

    This observation also applies in a biological system, where information that is unfilled and does not provide a selective advantage is often lost.

  28. 28.

    McLuhan (1998b).

  29. 29.

    An argument has been put forward that the present set-up should be changed because it dictates a single-language dimension. I beg to differ with the approach rather than the logic of the argument. The fact is that English is the dominant language because, as mentioned above, more documents are either written in or translated into English. This is not going to change even if the dominant language on the Internet changes, say, from English to Chinese, because information that is available on the Internet is inscribed in English.

  30. 30.

    Here the definition of language is similar to that defined by Saussure, as an organism, which is governed by a code and that this code is written according to rules (grammar). See F. de Saussure, SAUSSURE’S FIRST COURSE OF LECTURES ON GENERAL LINGUISTICS (1907), translated by George Wolf, Pergamon, 1996.

  31. 31.

    Arrow (1996).

  32. 32.

    Ibid, pp. 120.

  33. 33.

    Grossman (2012).

  34. 34.

    Ibid. pp.171.

  35. 35.

    See Lori Thurgood, Mary J. Golladay, and Susan T. Hill, U.S. Doctorates in the twentieth Century, National Science Foundation, June 2006. The report is available on Internet.

  36. 36.

    Bizony (2007).

  37. 37.

    Mirowski and Sent (2002).

  38. 38.

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relations_of_production

  39. 39.

    Bloch (1971).

  40. 40.

    The reader should note that this study argues that these terms could not have prevailed without today’s culture of information where billboard lights constantly endorse visual messages, pervasiveness of “talking heads” exponentially rising and our young are thought how to drained deeper and deeper into virtual obsoleteness.

  41. 41.

    Slaughter and Rhoads (2002).

  42. 42.

    Ibid. pp. 85.

  43. 43.

    Unfortunately, at the present, these sort of erroneous arguments continue to play a major role in policy-making, both at the level of universities and at the level of governments. The urge to links commercial interest and public welfare seems to join for years to come.

  44. 44.

    Alexis De Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Project Gutenberg HTML File, Volume I, Chapter 35, pp. 533.

  45. 45.

    Noble (2001).

  46. 46.

    Mirowski and Sent (2008).

  47. 47.

    Forman (2002).

  48. 48.

    In Hungry, Lawmakers from Hungart’s populist ruling party have proposed to grant foreign nationals residency in exchange for purchasing of government bonds (see Margit Feher, “Hungary Offer Wealthy Foreigners Residency for Help on Debt”, Wall Street Journal, Oct 31, 2012, p. A11).

  49. 49.

    A 20-year-old Brazilian woman auctioning off her virginity online (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/24/catarina-migliorini-sells-virginity-780k_n_2010260.html#slide=1682650); and

  50. 50.

    Having said that, the definition is wide open to various interpretation. For instance, American author Bell Hooks refers to cultural commodification as “eating the other”. By this she means that cultural expressions, revolutionary or post-modern, can be sold to the dominant culture (see Bell, Hooks, Black Looks: Race and Representation, South End Press, 1992).

  51. 51.

    Williams and Windebank (2003).

  52. 52.

    Robert L. Grossman (2012, pp. 173).

  53. 53.

    Mann and Pecant (1891).

  54. 54.

    Russell (2009).

  55. 55.

    Miller (1972).

  56. 56.

    Rifkin (2009).

  57. 57.

    Manno (2000).

  58. 58.

    Jack P. Manno, 2000, pp. 28, footnote 23.

  59. 59.

    Ibid. pp. 30.

  60. 60.

    Ibid. pp. 31.

  61. 61.

    See “Sale of human organs should be legalized”, Independent Newspaper, November 09, 2013 (can be access at http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/sale-of-human-organs-should-be-legalised-say-surgeons-2176110.html.); S. M. Rothman and D. J. Rothman, “The Hidden Cost of Organ Sale”, American Journal of Transplantation; February 13, 2006, pp. 1524–29; and S. H. D, “Regulating the Sale of Human Organs”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 71, no6, September 1985, pp. 1015–1038.

  62. 62.

    One may sees the above explanations as a simplification of very complex and interdependent issues, which we have no quarrel with. But, retaining simplification does not invalidate the content in which the argument is made, which we believed is the case here. In fact, the propensity to favor simplicity facilitates to detangle an intricate structure and reveal what needed to be observed. Having said that, it is obvious that the issues at hand retain complex structure, but to described or illustrating one’s perception, of a cause(s) does not necessarily entails a polygonal account. Truth is embedded with the amazing power of illumination and resonation.

  63. 63.

    It may seem as a bit unreal title. However, a Google search for the exact title would provides more than 2000 results.

  64. 64.

    Here we used the same examples that Manno used when he made a similar observation (see Jack P. Manno, 2000, pp. 12).

References

  • Arrow KJ (1996) The economics of information: an exposition. Empirica 23:119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babe RE (2009) Cultural studies and political economy: toward a new integration. Lexington Books, Lanham, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict R (2006) Patterns of culture. Mariner Books, New York, p 46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizony P (2007) Atom. Icon Book, Thriplow, p xv

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch E (1971) On karl marx. Herder & Herder, New York, p 166

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1993) The field of cultural production: essays on art and literature, Edited and Introduced by Randal Johnson. Columbia University Press, New York, p 234

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler P (1952) The cultural function of the library. Libr Q 22(2):79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Pirzadeh A (2014) The knowledge of culture and the culture of knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1996) The blind watchmaker. W. W. Norton, New York, p 112

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J, Baird RM, Rosenbaum SE (eds) (1999) Individualism old and new. Prometheus Books, Amherst, p 69

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairthorne RA (1954) The theory of communication. Aslib Proc 6(4):259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman P (2002) Recent science: late-modern and postmodern. In: Mirowski P, Sent E-M (eds) Science bought and sold: essay in the economics of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 102

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick J (2011) Information: a history, a theory, a flood. Pantheon Book, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman RL (2012) The structure of digital computing: from mainframes to big data. Open Data Press, River Forest, p 167

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1984) National cultures and corporate cultures. In: Samovar LA, Porter RE (eds) Communication between cultures. Wadsworth, Belmont, p 51

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavalle S, Lesser E, Shockley R, Hopkins MS, Kruschwitz N et al (2011) Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value, vol 52(2). MIT Sloan Management Review, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, pp 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann H, Pecant F (1891) Life and works of horace mann. vol IV, Harvard University Press, p 129

    Google Scholar 

  • Manno JP (2000) Privileged goods: commoditization and its impact on environment and society. CRC Press, Boca Raton p 10. The emphasis was added

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason R (2003) Understanding understanding. Sate University of New York Press, Albany, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan M (1998a) Understanding media: the extensions of man. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan M (1998b) Understanding media: the extensions of man. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 283

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GT (1972) Energetic, kinetics and life. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, p 291

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski P, Sent E-M (eds) (2002) Science bought and sold: essay in the economics of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski P, Sent E-M (2008) The commercialization of science and the response of STS. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J (eds) The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p 635

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble DF (2001) Digital diploma mills: the automation of higher education. Monthly Review Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin J (2009) The empathic civilization. Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin, New York, p 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell B (2009) An outline of philosophy. Routledge, New York p 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. The Free Press, New York, p 227

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter S, Rhoads G (2002) The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and commercialization of academic science and technology. In: Mirowski P, Sent E-M (eds) Science bought and sold: essay in the economics of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CC, Windebank J (2003) The slow advance and uneven penetration of commodification. Int J Urban Reg Res 27.2:250

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias G. Carayannis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carayannis, E.G., Popescu, D., Pirzadeh, A. (2015). The Culture of Information and the Information of Culture. In: Bast, G., Carayannis, E., Campbell, D. (eds) Arts, Research, Innovation and Society. Arts, Research, Innovation and Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09909-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics