Skip to main content

Agreement Technologies and Multi-agent Environments

  • Conference paper
Book cover ICT Innovations 2014 (ICT Innovations 2014)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 311))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 913 Accesses

Abstract

Agreements as crucial social concepts are present in all human interactions and without them there is no cooperation in social systems. As a consequence of rapid development of different disciplines, agreement and processes for reaching agreements between different kinds of agents, getting a subject of perspective research activities. Agreement Technologies refer as well to computer systems in which autonomous software agents negotiate with one another, in order to come to mutually acceptable agreements.

The goals of this paper are to present the essential issues in Agreement Technologies and highlight its influence on multi-agent environments.

The work is partially supported by Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia, through project no. OI174023: “Intelligent techniques and their integration into wide-spectrum decision support”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F., García-Camino, A., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C.: Operationalisation of norms for usage in electronic institutions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 223–225. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Argente, E., Boissier, O., Carrascosa, C., Fornara, N., McBurney, P., Noriega, P., Ricci, A., Sabater-Mir, J., Schumacher, M., Tampitsikas, C., Taveter, K., Vizzari, G., Vouros, G.A.: Environment and Agreement Technologies. In: AT 2012, pp. 260–261 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Axelrod, R.M.: The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Constitutive norms in the design of normative multi-agent systems. In: Toni, F., Torroni, P. (eds.) CLIMA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3900, pp. 303–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., van der Torre, L.: Beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires as components in an agent architecture. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 20(9), 893–920 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Trust theory: A socio-cognitive and computational model. Wiley Series in Agent Technology. Wiley, Chichester (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. da Silva, V.T., Choren, R., de Lucena, C.J.P.: A UML based approach for modeling and implementing multi-agent systems. In: International Joint Conference on Proceedings of the Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, vol. 2, pp. 914–921. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dignum, V.: A model for organizational interaction: Based on agents, founded in logic. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Utrecht (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dimitrakos, T.: System models, e-risks and e-trust. In: Proceedings of the IFIP conference on towards the E-society: E-Commerce, E-Business, E-Government, I3E 2001, pp. 45–58. Kluwer, Deventer (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Esteva, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Rosell, B., Arcos, J.L.: AMELI: An agent-based middleware for electronic institutions. In: Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C., Sonenberg, L., Tambe, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 236–243. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O., Michel, F.: From agents to organizations: An organizational view of multi-agent systems. In: Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P., Odell, J.J. (eds.) AOSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2935, pp. 214–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Gâteau, B., Boissier, O., Khadraoui, D., Dubois, E.: Moiseinst: An organizational model for specifying rights and duties of autonomous agents. In: Third European workshop on multi-agent systems (EUMAS 2005), Brussels, pp. 484–485 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Homola, M.: Distributed description logics revisited. In: Calvanese, D., Franconi, E., Haarslev, V., Lembo, D., Motik, B., Tessaris, S., Turhan, A.Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2007, Brixen, Bressanone, Italy, June 8-10. Bolzano University Press (2007), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-250/paper_51.pdf

  14. Horling, B., Lesser, V.: A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms. The Knowledge Engineering Review 19(4), 281–316 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J., Boissier, O.: A model for the structural, functional, and deontic specification of organizations in multi-agent systems. In: Bittencourt, G., Ramalho, G.L. (eds.) SBIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2507, pp. 118–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Hübner, J.F., Boissier, O., Kitio, R., Ricci, A.: Instrumenting multi-agent organisations with organisational artifacts and agents. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huynh, T.D., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N.R.: An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 13, 119–154 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirschner, P.A., Buckingham Shum, S.J., Carr, C.S.: Visualizing argumentation:Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer, London (2003), http://oro.open.ac.uk/12107

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Lesser, V., Decker, K., Wagner, T., Carver, N., Garvey, A., Horling, B., Neiman, D., Podorozhny, R., NagendraPrasad, M., Raja, A., Vincent, R., Xuan, P., Zhang, X.: Evolution of the gpgp/taems domain-independent coordination framework. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 9(1), 87–143 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ossowski, S.: Agreement Technologies. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol. 8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ossowski, S., Sierra, C., Botti, V.: Agreement Technologies: A Computing perspective. In: Ossowski, S. (ed.). Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol. 8, pp. 3–16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van Dyke Parunak, H., Odell, J.J.: Representing social structures in UML. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Weiß, G., Ciancarini, P. (eds.) AOSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2222, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramchurn, S., Vytelingum, P., Rogers, A., Jennings, N.: Putting the “Smarts” into the smart grid: A grand challenge for artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM 55(4), 86–97 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sabater-Mir, J., Paolucci, M.L.: On Representation and aggregation of social evaluations in computational trust and reputation models. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 46(3), 458–483 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Cranefield, S., Purvis, M.A., Purvis, M.K.: Obligation norm identification in agent societies. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 13(4) (2010), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/13/4/3.html

  26. Sen, S., Airiau, S.: Emergence of norms through social learning. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 1507–1512. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shaheen Fatima, S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Optimal Negotiation of Multiple Issues in Incomplete Information Settings. In: AAMAS 2004, pp. 1080-1087 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sterling, L., Taveter, K.: The art of agent-oriented modeling. MIT, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tambe, M., Adibi, J., Alonaizon, Y., Erdem, A., Kaminka, G.A., Marsella, S., Muslea, I.: Building agent teams using an explicit teamwork model and learning. Artificial Intelligence 110(2), 215–239 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Zimmermann, A.: Integrated distributed description logics. In: Calvanese, D., Franconi, E., Haarslev, V., Lembo, D., Motik, B., Tessaris, S., Turhan, A.Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Description logics, DL 2007, Brixen, Bressanone, Italy, June 8-10, 2007, pp. 507–514. Bolzano University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirjana Ivanović .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ivanović, M. (2015). Agreement Technologies and Multi-agent Environments. In: Bogdanova, A., Gjorgjevikj, D. (eds) ICT Innovations 2014. ICT Innovations 2014. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 311. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09879-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09879-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09878-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09879-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics