Abstract
Previous empirical analysis of police legitimacy had focused mainly on legitimacy as perceived by people over whom police exercise power (e.g., offenders, victims, and the general population). We know relatively little about police officers’ sense of their own legitimacy, what predicts such self-legitimacy, and the consequences of self-legitimacy for behavior and decision choices officers make. This chapter draws on survey data from police officers in Slovenia to explore these issues. Officers with a greater sense of self-legitimacy were officers who received fair treatment from their supervisors, had good interpersonal relations with colleagues, and who believed the recognized them as legitimate. Self-legitimacy, in turn, was found to predict the decision of officers to choose verbal warning rather than threat of physical force to take control of situations. It was associated with a greater likelihood to engage in pro-organizational behavior. The quality of interpersonal relations with colleagues was the strongest predicted of pro-organizational behavior but not decision to use force.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alpert, G., & Dunham, R. (2004). Understanding police use of force: Officers, suspects, and reciprocity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barbalet, J. (2001). Emotions, social theory and social structure: A macrosociological approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barker, R. (2001). Legitimating identities: The self-presentation of rulers and subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bittner, E. (1970). The functions of the police in modern society. Cambridge: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain.
Bottoms, A. E. (2002). Morality, crime, compliance and public policy. In A. E. Bottoms & M. Tonry (Eds.), Ideology, crime and criminal justice: A symposium in honour of Sir Leon Radzinowicz (pp. 15–60). Cullompton, Devon: Willan.
Bottoms, E. A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.
Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2013). Voice within: Powerholders’ perspectives on authority and legitimacy. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration (pp. 60–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bradford, B., & Quinton, P. (2014). Self-legitimacy, police culture and support for democratic policing in an English constabulary. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper, No. 14/2014. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2406350
Bradford, B., Quinton, P., Myhill, A., & Porter, G. (in press). Why do ‘the law’ comply? Procedural justice, group identification and officer motivation in police organizations. European Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1177/1477370813491898
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Frow, J. (2000). Economies of value. In J. L. Machor & P. Goldstein (Eds.), Reception study: From literary theory to cultural studies (pp. 294–318). London: Routledge.
Fyfe, J. J. (1988). Police use of deadly force: Research and reform. Justice Quarterly, 5(2), 165–205.
Hagan, J., & McCarthy, B. (1997). Mean streets: Youth crime and homelessness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, E. A., & Hohl, K. (2012). Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales. Oxford: Routledge.
Johnson, D., & Kuhns, J. B. (2009). Striking out: Race and support for police use of force. Justice Quarterly, 26(3), 592–623.
Kaina, V. (2008). Legitimacy, trust and procedural fairness: Remarks on Marcia Grimes’ study. European Journal of Political Research, 47(4), 510–521.
Kohan, A., & Mazmanian, D. (2003). Police work, burnout, and pro-organizational behavior: A consideration of daily work experiences. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(5), 559–583.
Kronman, A. (1983). Max Weber. London: Edward Arnold.
Lersch, K. M., Bazley, T., Mieczkowski, T., & Childs, K. (2008). Police use of force and neighbourhood characteristics: An examination of structural disadvantage, crime, and resistance. Policing Society, 18(3), 282–300.
Loader, I., & Walker, N. (2001). Policing as a public good: Reconstituting the connections between policing and the state. Theoretical Criminology, 5(1), 9–35.
McCarthy, B., Hagan, J., & Martin, M. J. (2002). In and out of harm’s way: Violent victimization and the social capital of fictive street families. Criminology, 40(4), 831–866.
McElvain, J. P., & Kposowa, A. J. (2008). Police officer characteristics and the likelihood of using deadly force. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(4), 505–521.
Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P., & Organ, D. W. (1993). Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3), 209–225.
Muir, W. K. (1977). Police: Streetcorner politicians. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2012). Understanding cooperation with police in a diverse society. British Journal of Criminology, 52(1), 181–201.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.
Papachristos, A. V., Meares, T. L., & Fagan, J. (2012). Why do criminals obey the law? The influence of legitimacy and social networks on active gun offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(2), 397–440.
Phibbs, M. W. (2011). Analyzing organizational performance from the bottom up. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/december-2011/analyzing-organizational-performance.
Piquero, A., Fagan, J., Mulvey, E., Steinberg, L., & Odgers, C. (2005). Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 96(1), 267–298.
Punch, M. (2000). Police corruption and its prevention. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 8(3), 301–324.
Reisig, M. D., Tankebe, J., & Meško, G. (2012). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and public cooperation with the police among young Slovene adults. Varstvoslovje, 14(2), 147–164.
Rydberg, J., & Terrill, W. (2010). The effect of higher education on police behavior. Police Quarterly, 13(1), 92–120.
Skolnick, J. H. (1994). Justice without trial: Law enforcement in democratic society (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
Sternberger, D. (1968). Legitimacy. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), The international encyclopaedia of the social sciences (pp. 244–248). New York, NY: Free Press.
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–348.
Tankebe, J. (2009). Self-help, policing and procedural justice: Vigilantism and the rule of law in Ghana. Law & Society Review, 43(2), 245–269.
Tankebe, J. (2010). Legitimation and resistance: Police reform in the (un)making. In L. K. Cheliotis (Ed.), Roots, rites and sites of resistance: The banality of good (pp. 197–219). London: Palgrave.
Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–135.
Tankebe, J. (2014). Police self-legitimacy. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 3735–3742). New York, NY: Springer.
Tankebe, J. (in press). Rightful authority: Exploring the structure of police self-legitimacy. In A. Liebling, J. Shapland, & J. Tankebe (Eds.), Crime, justice and social order: Essays in honour of A. E. Bottoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Terrill, W., & Reisig, M. D. (2003). Neighborhood context influence on the level of force used in citizen-police encounters. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(3), 291–321.
Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. Yale: Yale University Press.
Tyler, T. (2011). Trust and legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 8(4), 254–266.
Tyler, T., & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Tyler, T., Callahan, P., & Frost, J. (2007). Armed, and dangerous (?): Motivating rule adherence among agents of social control. Law & Society Review, 41(2), 457–492.
Weisburd, D., Greenspan, R., Hamilton, E. E., Williams, H., & Bryant, K. A. (2000). Police attitudes toward abuse of authority: Findings from a national study. Washington: National Institute of Justice.
Worden, R. (1989). Situational and attitudinal explanations of police behavior: A theoretical reappraisal and empirical assessment. Law & Society Review, 23(4), 667–711.
Wrong, D. (1995). Power: Its forms, bases and uses. London: Transaction.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tankebe, J., Meško, G. (2015). Police Self-Legitimacy, Use of Force, and Pro-organizational Behavior in Slovenia. In: Meško, G., Tankebe, J. (eds) Trust and Legitimacy in Criminal Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09813-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09813-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09812-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09813-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)